EIN: 464109067
UEI: K2KUQXGFKCC8
Audited by: The Adams Group, LLC
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 3, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 3, 2025 (339 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on May 2, 2024 — management decision was due November 2, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on August 14, 2023 — management decision was due February 14, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 5, 2022 — management decision was due March 5, 2023.
During our testing, we noted that the Organization did not use actual time and effort records to allocate payroll costs to the major program. Questioned Costs: None Context: In our sample of forty payroll disbursements, The Adams Group, LLC noted that the Organization did not utilize actual time and effort records to allocate payroll costs to the federal award during the first three quarters of the fiscal year. Cause: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. The Organization was made aware of this requirement during their 2020 audit. The Organization was not able to implement the new control to be in compliance with the federal requirement until September 30, 2021. Effect: Payroll costs allocated to the federal program during the first three quarters of 2021 do not reflect actual time and effort spent on the program.. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Adams Group, LLC recommends that Young People in Recovery implement a process to verify that the allocation of payroll costs to federal programs. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2021-01 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Title: Opioid State Targeted Response CFDA Number: 93.788 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations 2 CFR 200.430, Compensation ? personal services requires that charges to federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must be supported by a system of internal control which provides reasonable assurance that the charges are accurate, allowable, and properly allocated to reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensated by the non-Federal entity, not exceeding 100% of compensated activities. Condition: During our testing, we noted that the Organization did not use actual time and effort records to allocate payroll costs to the major program. Questioned Costs: None Context: In our sample of forty payroll disbursements, The Adams Group, LLC noted that the Organization did not utilize actual time and effort records to allocate payroll costs to the federal award during the first three quarters of the fiscal year. Cause: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. The Organization was made aware of this requirement during their 2020 audit. The Organization was not able to implement the new control to be in compliance with the federal requirement until September 30, 2021. Effect: Payroll costs allocated to the federal program during the first three quarters of 2021 do not reflect actual time and effort spent on the program.. Repeat Finding: This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Adams Group, LLC recommends that Young People in Recovery implement a process to verify that the allocation of payroll costs to federal programs. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.
Audit Response: YPR initiated a new time keeping process in October 2021 where employees are given a timesheet at the beginning of each pay period and told to document the amount of time they spent throughout each day on each program they worked on. This new procedure is in place for the 4th quarter of 2021 forward. Payroll costs will be allocated to grants / awards / programs based on the actual documented time spent working on those programs. All employee?s hours were recorded in ADP in 2021; however, the organization did not maintain time sheets with the number of hours employees worked on specific programs for some full-time employees for part of the year. Payroll costs for full time employees that worked directly on more than one program during a pay period were allocated to federal awards based on budgeted hours worked. All part time employees worked on only one program and hours are tracked in ADP.
2020-001
FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2021 — management decision was due May 1, 2022.
The Organization did not use time reports to allocate costs to federal awards. Instead, payroll costs were allocated by budget. This is a repeat finding. Criteria: Subpart E-paragraph 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses states that Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. The Guidance also states that Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards? Cause: While the Organization does require employees to complete time reports, they were initially unaware of the requirement that charges to federal awards should be based on these reports rather than on the grant budget. The audit was completed in the latter part of the prior year, so there hasn?t been enough time to correct the situation. Additionally, one funder requested that invoices be submitted monthly based on the budget, rather than the actual costs incurred to deliver the program. Effect: Amounts charged may not accurately reflect that actual time spent on the program. Recommendation: The Organization has an indirect cost rate that could be written to include management and administrative personnel into the indirect rate. This would alleviate the burden of these employees trying to decide how to fairly allocate their time. The Uniform Guidance also allows Organizations that use budget estimates to review and reconcile those estimates to the actual costs documented by time reports. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: YPR has initiated a new time keeping process where employees are given a timesheet at the beginning of each pay period and told to document the amount of time they spent throughout each day on each program they worked on.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴DEPARTMENT OF HEALH AND HUMAN SERVICES Opioid State Targeted Response ? CFDA# 93.788 Grant No.18-95406 and 20-10341; Grant Period - Year Ended December 31, 2020 Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704; Grant Period ? Year Ended December 31, 2020 2020-001 Condition: The Organization did not use time reports to allocate costs to federal awards. Instead, payroll costs were allocated by budget. This is a repeat finding. Criteria: Subpart E-paragraph 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses states that Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. The Guidance also states that Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards? Cause: While the Organization does require employees to complete time reports, they were initially unaware of the requirement that charges to federal awards should be based on these reports rather than on the grant budget. The audit was completed in the latter part of the prior year, so there hasn?t been enough time to correct the situation. Additionally, one funder requested that invoices be submitted monthly based on the budget, rather than the actual costs incurred to deliver the program. Effect: Amounts charged may not accurately reflect that actual time spent on the program. Recommendation: The Organization has an indirect cost rate that could be written to include management and administrative personnel into the indirect rate. This would alleviate the burden of these employees trying to decide how to fairly allocate their time. The Uniform Guidance also allows Organizations that use budget estimates to review and reconcile those estimates to the actual costs documented by time reports. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: YPR has initiated a new time keeping process where employees are given a timesheet at the beginning of each pay period and told to document the amount of time they spent throughout each day on each program they worked on.
2019-001 Department of Health and Human Services Opioid State Targeted Response - CFDA#93.788 Condition: The Organization did not use time reports to allocate costs to federal awards. Instead, payroll costs were allocated by budget. This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Organization has an indirect cost rate that could be written to include management and administrative personnel into the indirect rate. This would alleviate the burden of these employees trying to decide how to fairly allocate their time. The Uniform Guidance also allows Organizations that use budget estimates to review and reconcile those estimates to the actual costs documented by time reports. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Audit Response: YPR has initiated a new time keeping process where employees are given a timesheet at the beginning of each pay period and told to document the amount of time they spent throughout each day on each program they worked on. This new procedure is in place for the 4th quarter of 2021 forward. Payroll costs will be allocated to grants / awards / programs based on the actual time spent working on those programs. Contact(s): Jenna Gastineau & Roy Olofson, jenna.gastineau@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Roy.olofson@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Anticipated Date of Completion: Implemented October 2021.
2019-001
Amounts requested for reimbursement weren?t supported by the general ledger, but rather by the grant budget. This resulted in cash draws that were much greater than expenditures. The situation was made worse due to the pandemic which sharply reduced some costs. Criteria: Subpart D Paragraph 200.302 requires an entity?s financial management system to be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms?.and the tracing of funds?adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to terms and conditions of the Federal award. Subpart D Paragraph 200.305 requires payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and the disbursement of those funds. Cause: One funder classified the grant agreement as a performance-based contract and requested monthly invoices based on the budget. Additionally, the Program Managers didn?t have the necessary information available to invoice or to make budget adjustments based on actual expenditures. Effect: The amounts invoiced exceeded the actual costs resulting in cash that needed to be carried over into the next grant year. Recommendation: The Organization should make reimbursement requests that are supported by the general ledger. Any differences should be reconciled each month to avoid accumulating excess cash. If a funder prefers that invoicing be based on budget only, it may be necessary to adjust the budget to account for unexpected variances in expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: YPR now performs reconciliations to ensure individual program general ledgers equals actual costs incurred are in line with budgeted expenses.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704; Grant Period ? Year Ended December 31, 2020 2020-002 Condition: Amounts requested for reimbursement weren?t supported by the general ledger, but rather by the grant budget. This resulted in cash draws that were much greater than expenditures. The situation was made worse due to the pandemic which sharply reduced some costs. Criteria: Subpart D Paragraph 200.302 requires an entity?s financial management system to be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms?.and the tracing of funds?adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to terms and conditions of the Federal award. Subpart D Paragraph 200.305 requires payment methods must minimize the time elapsing between the transfer of funds and the disbursement of those funds. Cause: One funder classified the grant agreement as a performance-based contract and requested monthly invoices based on the budget. Additionally, the Program Managers didn?t have the necessary information available to invoice or to make budget adjustments based on actual expenditures. Effect: The amounts invoiced exceeded the actual costs resulting in cash that needed to be carried over into the next grant year. Recommendation: The Organization should make reimbursement requests that are supported by the general ledger. Any differences should be reconciled each month to avoid accumulating excess cash. If a funder prefers that invoicing be based on budget only, it may be necessary to adjust the budget to account for unexpected variances in expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: YPR now performs reconciliations to ensure individual program general ledgers equals actual costs incurred are in line with budgeted expenses.
2019-002 Department of Health and Human Services Opioid State Targeted Response - CFDA#93.788 Condition: Amounts requested for reimbursement weren?t supported by the general ledger, but rather by the grant budget. This resulted in cash draws that were much greater than expenditures. The situation was made worse due to the pandemic which sharply reduced some costs Recommendation: The Organization should make reimbursement requests that are supported by the general ledger. Any differences should be reconciled each month to avoid accumulating excess cash. If a funder prefers that invoicing be based on budget only, it may be necessary to adjust the budget to account for unexpected variances in expenditures. Audit Response: YPR now performs reconciliations to ensure individual program general ledgers equals actual costs incurred and are in line with budgeted expenses. Prior to the draft Single Audit date, we implemented SAP Concur to process and track expense reports. Concur allows the Finance team to monitor Program Managers to properly account for charges and expenses. The company implemented a ?Program Budgeting & Invoicing Process?. This process requires that each program manager monitors the expense reports that are submitted and allocated to that program. They must review the previous month?s general ledger to track against their program?s budget. Contact(s): Jenna Gastineau & Roy Olofson, jenna.gastineau@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Roy.olofson@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Anticipated Date of Completion: December 31, 2021
2019-002
Both contracts covered under this award require monthly reporting of specific demographic data for the population served. We were unable to verify this information had been reported. This is a repeat finding. Criteria: One grant requires monthly reports including demographics (age, sex race/ethnicity) and pregnancy status of the My Recovery is Epic program funded by KORE. The other grant requires reported by month?number of resources developed and target audience, number of trainings, number of attendees, and unique clients receiving peer support/recovery services. Cause: The program manager possibly did not collect this information for reporting purposes. Another program manager wasn?t aware of this requirement and noted the funder didn?t require this monthly reporting. Recommendation: The Organization should follow the reporting requirements in the contract or obtain a written waiver from the funder, and work to assure that future contracts don?t come with unwanted verbiage and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The company created a contract review policy and an authority to execute agreements that are being implemented moving forward.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704; Grant Period ? Year Ended December 31, 2020 Grant No.18-95406 and 20-10341; Grant Period - Year Ended December 31, 2020 2020-003 Condition: Both contracts covered under this award require monthly reporting of specific demographic data for the population served. We were unable to verify this information had been reported. This is a repeat finding. Criteria: One grant requires monthly reports including demographics (age, sex race/ethnicity) and pregnancy status of the My Recovery is Epic program funded by KORE. The other grant requires reported by month?number of resources developed and target audience, number of trainings, number of attendees, and unique clients receiving peer support/recovery services. Cause: The program manager possibly did not collect this information for reporting purposes. Another program manager wasn?t aware of this requirement and noted the funder didn?t require this monthly reporting. Recommendation: The Organization should follow the reporting requirements in the contract or obtain a written waiver from the funder, and work to assure that future contracts don?t come with unwanted verbiage and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: The company created a contract review policy and an authority to execute agreements that are being implemented moving forward.
2019-003 Department of Health and Human Services Opioid State Targeted Response - CFDA#93.788 Condition: Both contracts covered under this award require monthly reporting of specific demographic data for the population served. We were unable to verify this information had been reported. This is a repeat finding. Recommendation: The Organization should follow the reporting requirements in the contract or obtain a written waiver from the funder, and work to assure that future contracts don?t come with unwanted verbiage and requirements. Audit Response: YPR has assigned employees to report program data and supervisors to ensure they are compliant with their contracts. The company created a contract review policy and an authority to execute agreements that are being implemented moving forward. The company also established a request for legal review procedure so that YPR counsel can review all government and large non-government contracts and grants. Contact(s): Jenna Gastineau & Roy Olofson, jenna.gastineau@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Roy.olofson@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Anticipated Date of Completion: December 31, 2021
2019-003
FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2021 — management decision was due May 1, 2022.
The Organization did not use time reports to allocate costs to federal awards. Instead, payroll costs were allocated by budget. Criteria: Subpart E-paragraph 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses states that Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. The Guidance also states that Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards? Cause: While the Organization does require employees to complete time reports, they were unaware of the requirement that charges to federal awards should be based on these reports rather than on the grant budget. Effect: Amounts charged may not accurately reflect that actual time spent on the program. Recommendation: The Organization has an indirect cost rate that could be written to include management and administrative personnel into the indirect rate. This would alleviate the burden of these employees trying to decide how to fairly allocate their time. The Uniform Guidance also allows Organizations that use budget estimates to review and reconcile those estimates to the actual costs documented by time reports. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Since the draft date, we have worked with our team that writes / submits grants to use the approved indirect rate to account for the personnel that work across all grants within the organization. Alongside this, we are requiring that all full time staff record their hours moving forward, especially the ones that work on multiple projects. We will have to work closely with the team members that work across projects to ensure that they are keeping track appropriately with what the contract for that project allows.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴DEPARTMENT OF HEALH AND HUMAN SERVICES Opioid State Targeted Response ? CFDA# 93.788 Grant No.18-95406; Grant Period - Year Ended December 31, 2019 Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704; Grant Period ? Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019-001 Condition: The Organization did not use time reports to allocate costs to federal awards. Instead, payroll costs were allocated by budget. Criteria: Subpart E-paragraph 200.430(i) Standards for Documentation of Personnel Expenses states that Charges to Federal awards for salaries and wages must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. The Guidance also states that Budget estimates (i.e., estimates determined before the services are performed) alone do not qualify as support for charges to Federal awards? Cause: While the Organization does require employees to complete time reports, they were unaware of the requirement that charges to federal awards should be based on these reports rather than on the grant budget. Effect: Amounts charged may not accurately reflect that actual time spent on the program. Recommendation: The Organization has an indirect cost rate that could be written to include management and administrative personnel into the indirect rate. This would alleviate the burden of these employees trying to decide how to fairly allocate their time. The Uniform Guidance also allows Organizations that use budget estimates to review and reconcile those estimates to the actual costs documented by time reports. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Since the draft date, we have worked with our team that writes / submits grants to use the approved indirect rate to account for the personnel that work across all grants within the organization. Alongside this, we are requiring that all full time staff record their hours moving forward, especially the ones that work on multiple projects. We will have to work closely with the team members that work across projects to ensure that they are keeping track appropriately with what the contract for that project allows.
2019-001 Department of Health and Human Services Opioid State Targeted Response - CFDA#93.788 Recommendation: The Organization has an indirect cost rate that could be written to include management and administrative personnel into the indirect rate. This would alleviate the burden of these employees trying to decide how to fairly allocate their time. The Uniform Guidance also allows Organizations that use budget estimates to review and reconcile those estimates to the actual costs documented by time reports. All necessary adjustments must be made such that the final amount charged to the Federal award is accurate, allowable, and properly allocated. Action Taken: Since the Draft date, the Business Operations Department has collaborated with the Department that submits grant proposals and proposed budgets to use the approved indirect rate to account for the personnel that work across multiple grants within the organization. YPR will implement policies and procedures and will monitor, and oversee the team members that work across multiple projects to ensure proper tracking with the grant contract and budget. YPR will require all employees, hourly and salary, to track their time spent on programs connected to grants and contracts using ADP TotalSource. Contact(s): Jenna Gastineau, jenna.gastineau@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Anticipated Date of Completion: March 31, 2021
Amounts requested for reimbursement weren?t supported by the general ledger. The funder reimburses a predetermined amount for administrative staff, regardless of their time reports. However, other charges such as payroll processing did not agree to the general ledger. The Organization also adds a ?generalized? expense to the invoice in addition to a 10% indirect rate. The Organization?s provisional rate is 30%. Criteria: Subpart D Paragraph 200.302 requires an entity?s financial management system to be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms?.and the tracing of funds?adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: In some cases, the amounts requested for reimbursement weren?t posted to the general ledger until the next period. In other cases, the amounts were incorrectly posted. While the Organization makes the effort to prepare an indirect cost rate, this rate hasn?t been incorporated into their grant agreements. Context: This finding is specific to Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704. We sampled two of the monthly reports submitted during 2019. Both requests exceeded the amounts posted to the general ledger by $2,319. Some of this difference was due to the ?generalized? expense which was not posted in the general ledger, but was requested as a reimbursement. Recommendation: The Organization should make reimbursement requests that are supported by the general ledger. Any differences should be reconciled each month. Overhead, or ?generalized expense? should be included in the indirect cost rate and charged accordingly. In the event the funder refuses to consider the indirect rate, any overhead charges should be allocated to the programs in the general ledger to support the amounts requested for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Prior to the draft date, we started using the software SAP Concur to process and track expense reports. This has allowed the finance team to work closely with the program managers to ensure that no charges fall through the cracks. Also, we have implemented a ?Program Budgeting & Invoicing Process''. This process ensures that program manager monitors the expense reports that are submitted and allocated to that program. They also must look through previous months' general ledger to track against their program?s budget to ensure that they remain within their budget. Lastly, they must submit their invoices that go out to vendors to the finance team to check against the general ledger each month before sending to the vendor. This process was rolled out in the summer of 2020, and it will be monitored closer and reinforced regularly.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704; Grant Period ? Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019-002 Condition: Amounts requested for reimbursement weren?t supported by the general ledger. The funder reimburses a predetermined amount for administrative staff, regardless of their time reports. However, other charges such as payroll processing did not agree to the general ledger. The Organization also adds a ?generalized? expense to the invoice in addition to a 10% indirect rate. The Organization?s provisional rate is 30%. Criteria: Subpart D Paragraph 200.302 requires an entity?s financial management system to be sufficient to permit the preparation of reports required by general and program-specific terms?.and the tracing of funds?adequate to establish that such funds have been used according to terms and conditions of the Federal award. Cause: In some cases, the amounts requested for reimbursement weren?t posted to the general ledger until the next period. In other cases, the amounts were incorrectly posted. While the Organization makes the effort to prepare an indirect cost rate, this rate hasn?t been incorporated into their grant agreements. Context: This finding is specific to Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704. We sampled two of the monthly reports submitted during 2019. Both requests exceeded the amounts posted to the general ledger by $2,319. Some of this difference was due to the ?generalized? expense which was not posted in the general ledger, but was requested as a reimbursement. Recommendation: The Organization should make reimbursement requests that are supported by the general ledger. Any differences should be reconciled each month. Overhead, or ?generalized expense? should be included in the indirect cost rate and charged accordingly. In the event the funder refuses to consider the indirect rate, any overhead charges should be allocated to the programs in the general ledger to support the amounts requested for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Prior to the draft date, we started using the software SAP Concur to process and track expense reports. This has allowed the finance team to work closely with the program managers to ensure that no charges fall through the cracks. Also, we have implemented a ?Program Budgeting & Invoicing Process''. This process ensures that program manager monitors the expense reports that are submitted and allocated to that program. They also must look through previous months' general ledger to track against their program?s budget to ensure that they remain within their budget. Lastly, they must submit their invoices that go out to vendors to the finance team to check against the general ledger each month before sending to the vendor. This process was rolled out in the summer of 2020, and it will be monitored closer and reinforced regularly.
2019-002 Department of Health and Human Services Opioid State Targeted Response - CFDA#93.788 Recommendation: The Organization should make reimbursement requests that are supported by the general ledger. Any differences should be reconciled each month. Overhead, or ?generalized expense? should be included in the indirect cost rate and charged accordingly. In the event the funder refuses to consider the indirect rate, any Corrective Action Plan overhead charges should be allocated to the programs in the general ledger to support the amounts requested for reimbursement. Action Taken: Prior to the draft Single Audit date, we implemented SAP Concur to process and track expense reports. This implements the ability for the Finance team to monitor Program Managers to properly account for charges and expenses. We have implemented a ?Program Budgeting & Invoicing Process?. This process requires that each program manager monitors the expense reports that are submitted and allocated to that program. They must review the previous month?s general ledger to track against their program?s budget. Lastly, they must submit their invoices to the finance team to check against the general ledger each month before sending to the vendor. This process was rolled out in the summer of 2020, and it will be monitored closer and reinforced regularly. Contact(s):Jenna Gastineau, jenna.gastineau@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Anticipated Date of Completion: February 15, 2021
Both the initial contract and the modification require periodic reporting of specific demographic data for the population served. None of the reports contain any information regarding race/ethnicity or pregnancy status for program participants. Criteria: The grant requires monthly reports including demographics (age, sex race/ethnicity) and pregnancy status of the My Recovery is Epic program funded by KORE. Cause: The program manager possibly did not collect this information for reporting purposes. Recommendation: The Organization should follow the reporting requirements in the contract or obtain a written waiver from the funder, and work to assure that future contracts don?t come with unwanted verbiage and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Since the draft date, there have been two director positions added below the Vice President of Programs which has created a new level of oversight. These two new positions will monitor the different chapters and programs to ensure they are compliant with their contracts.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Grant No. PON2 729 1900000704; Grant Period ? Year Ended December 31, 2019 2019-003 Condition: Both the initial contract and the modification require periodic reporting of specific demographic data for the population served. None of the reports contain any information regarding race/ethnicity or pregnancy status for program participants. Criteria: The grant requires monthly reports including demographics (age, sex race/ethnicity) and pregnancy status of the My Recovery is Epic program funded by KORE. Cause: The program manager possibly did not collect this information for reporting purposes. Recommendation: The Organization should follow the reporting requirements in the contract or obtain a written waiver from the funder, and work to assure that future contracts don?t come with unwanted verbiage and requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Since the draft date, there have been two director positions added below the Vice President of Programs which has created a new level of oversight. These two new positions will monitor the different chapters and programs to ensure they are compliant with their contracts.
2019-003 Department of Health and Human Services Opioid State Targeted Response - CFDA#93.788 Recommendation: The Organization should follow the reporting requirements in the contract or obtain a written waiver from the funder, and work to assure that future contracts don?t come with unwanted verbiage and requirements. Action Taken: Since the draft date, there have been two director positions added below the Vice President of Programs which has created a new level of oversight. These two new positions will monitor the different chapters and programs to ensure they are compliant with their contracts. We created a contract review policy and an authority to execute agreements that are being implemented moving forward. We also established a request for legal review procedure so that YPR counsel can review all government and large non-government contracts and grants. Contact(s): Jenna Gastineau, jenna.gastineau@youngpeopleinrecovery.org and Erickson, franklin.erickson@youngpeopleinrecovery.org Anticipated Date of Completion: January 31, 2021
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Colorado →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
