EIN: 462169402
UEI: U3PLLVCJJM96
Audited by: Wipfli LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 27, 2026 (23 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2025 — management decision was due September 20, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on September 5, 2024 — management decision was due March 5, 2025.
There were two timecards that had been processed and paid without supervisor approval.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴There were two timecards that had been processed and paid without supervisor approval.
The District will review timecards to ensure that all payroll expenses are properly reviewed, and review is documented.
2022-002
FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2022 — management decision was due June 18, 2023.
SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONS COSTS
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONS COSTS
SEE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONS COSTS
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONS COSTS
SEE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONS COSTS
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴SEE SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONS COSTS
SEE CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.
8. Criteria or specific requirement The District must report on how the revenue was spent as reflected in their general ledger. 9. Condition The general ledger reflects supplies were purchased for the program totalling $34,058.60. However, the expenditure report reflects payment of $35,059. 10. Questioned Costs $1,000 11. Context While it is likely the District spent well more than the program revenue, the actual expenditures recorded as paid by the program were less than was reported in the expenditure report. 12. Effect The expenditure reported was $1,000 more than was accounted for in actual expenditures as reflected in the general ledger. 13. Cause There was a typo in the reporting. 14. Recommendation A more careful review and/or another person's review would provide more likelihood of catching this. 15. Management's response The bookkeeper will double check all numbers placed into the ISBE expenditure reports with the financial management system before submission. Copies of both documents will be kept with monthly printouts.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴8. Criteria or specific requirement The District must report on how the revenue was spent as reflected in their general ledger. 9. Condition The general ledger reflects supplies were purchased for the program totalling $34,058.60. However, the expenditure report reflects payment of $35,059. 10. Questioned Costs $1,000 11. Context While it is likely the District spent well more than the program revenue, the actual expenditures recorded as paid by the program were less than was reported in the expenditure report. 12. Effect The expenditure reported was $1,000 more than was accounted for in actual expenditures as reflected in the general ledger. 13. Cause There was a typo in the reporting. 14. Recommendation A more careful review and/or another person's review would provide more likelihood of catching this. 15. Management's response The bookkeeper will double check all numbers placed into the ISBE expenditure reports with the financial management system before submission. Copies of both documents will be kept with monthly printouts.
Condition: The expenditure report submitted reflected more in expenditures than was purchased from the program due to a typo in the preparation of the report. Plan: The bookkeeper will double check all numbers placed into the ISBE expenditure reports with the financial management system before submission. Copies of both documents will be kept with monthly printouts. Anticipated Date of Completion: Immediate Name of Contact Person: William Walters, District Superintendent
FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2020 — management decision was due June 16, 2021.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Illinois →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
