EIN: 461615260
UEI: HDWYHTL84AM5
Audited by: Sharff, Wittmer, Kurtz, Jackson, & Diaz P.A.
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 13, 2026 (9 days from today).
What is a management decision? →During testing of payroll expenditures charged to Title I, Part A, we noted that a math coach compensated with Title I funds did not hold an active State of Florida teaching certification during the year under audit. The individual’s certification had previously been valid but expired and was not renewed timely. Cause: Management did not have adequate monitoring controls in place to ensure instructional staff funded with Title I maintained active certification status throughout the year. Effect: Payroll expenditures were charged to Title I for an individual who did not meet certification requirements during the audit period, resulting in noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Management represented that the math coach had previously met certification requirements and was otherwise qualified for the position. Compensation would have been allowable had certification been renewed timely. Perspective Information: As part of payroll testing for Title I, three payroll expenditures related to instructional personnel were selected for testing. Of the three items tested, one math coach did not meet the minimum State of Florida certification requirements during the year under audit due to a lapse in certification renewal. No other exceptions were noted in the items tested. Based on the procedures performed, this matter appears to be an isolated instance. The individual had previously held a valid certification and continued to perform instructional services during the period tested, with payroll costs charged to Title I. Recommendations: Management should implement procedures to monitor certification status and renewal dates for instructional personnel funded by Title I and other federally funded programs to ensure compliance with applicable certification requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding. As of the date of the audit report, the math coach has renewed and obtained an active State of Florida teaching certification. Management has implemented procedures to monitor certification expiration dates and verify certification status prior to charging payroll costs to Title I and other federally funded programs.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding 2025-001 – Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies (“Title 1”) Personnel Certification Noncompliance Program: U.S. Department of Education – Title I, Grants to Local Educational Agencies. Assistance Listing Number: 84.010A Criteria: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies program requirements and Florida Department of Education regulations require instructional personnel funded by Title I to maintain current state certification. Condition: During testing of payroll expenditures charged to Title I, Part A, we noted that a math coach compensated with Title I funds did not hold an active State of Florida teaching certification during the year under audit. The individual’s certification had previously been valid but expired and was not renewed timely. Cause: Management did not have adequate monitoring controls in place to ensure instructional staff funded with Title I maintained active certification status throughout the year. Effect: Payroll expenditures were charged to Title I for an individual who did not meet certification requirements during the audit period, resulting in noncompliance with program requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Management represented that the math coach had previously met certification requirements and was otherwise qualified for the position. Compensation would have been allowable had certification been renewed timely. Perspective Information: As part of payroll testing for Title I, three payroll expenditures related to instructional personnel were selected for testing. Of the three items tested, one math coach did not meet the minimum State of Florida certification requirements during the year under audit due to a lapse in certification renewal. No other exceptions were noted in the items tested. Based on the procedures performed, this matter appears to be an isolated instance. The individual had previously held a valid certification and continued to perform instructional services during the period tested, with payroll costs charged to Title I. Recommendations: Management should implement procedures to monitor certification status and renewal dates for instructional personnel funded by Title I and other federally funded programs to ensure compliance with applicable certification requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding. As of the date of the audit report, the math coach has renewed and obtained an active State of Florida teaching certification. Management has implemented procedures to monitor certification expiration dates and verify certification status prior to charging payroll costs to Title I and other federally funded programs.
Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management agrees with the finding. As of the date of the audit report, the math coach has renewed and obtained an active State of Florida teaching certification. Management has implemented procedures to monitor certification expiration dates and verify certification status prior to charging payroll costs to Title I and other federally funded programs.
FAC accepted this audit on March 1, 2025 — management decision was due September 1, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2021 — management decision was due August 21, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on June 3, 2020 — management decision was due December 3, 2020.
Our testing disclosed instances whereby applications not qualified as error prone were selected for verification while other applications which were error prone were not. Context: Failure to select error prone applications may result in an inadequate sample to verify. Effect:This increases the risk of ineligible students receiving benefits. Cause: The condition results from inadequate training for staff, who manually went through all applications and made decisions on which ones meet the error prone criteria. Recommendations: Management should reiterate the information given during training for staff who facilitate the verification process and ensure that staff understand the definition of ?error-prone? applications. Additionally, Schools should consider flagging those that meet the error prone definition when approving applications, which can help reduce the burden of manually going through all applications when facilitating the verification process.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: National School Lunch Program procedures require that when performing focused selection verification, applications considered to be error prone should be selected. Condition: Our testing disclosed instances whereby applications not qualified as error prone were selected for verification while other applications which were error prone were not. Context: Failure to select error prone applications may result in an inadequate sample to verify. Effect:This increases the risk of ineligible students receiving benefits. Cause: The condition results from inadequate training for staff, who manually went through all applications and made decisions on which ones meet the error prone criteria. Recommendations: Management should reiterate the information given during training for staff who facilitate the verification process and ensure that staff understand the definition of ?error-prone? applications. Additionally, Schools should consider flagging those that meet the error prone definition when approving applications, which can help reduce the burden of manually going through all applications when facilitating the verification process.
Finding 2019-01: School Lunch Verification Testing - cites instances where applications selected for verification did not qualify as "error prone" according to federal guidelines while other applications that were "error prone" were not selected. In order to correct the condition in the future Beacon College Prep, Inc. will reiterate the information given during the completed training to staff who facilitate the verification process and make sure they clearly understand the definition of "error prone" applications. We will also use the approved Income Eligibility Guidelines when identifying and flagging "error prone" applications during the approval process. Flagged applications will be double checked to make sure they qualify as "error prone" before they are submitted for testing.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Florida →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.