← Back to home

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF PROVIDENCE COUNTYNon-Profit

EIN: 461472304

UEI: LJXNQM5HNCQ7

Audited by: Kahn, Litwin, Renza & Co. Ltd

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF PROVIDENCE COUNTY10 audit years5 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$6.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

$6,078,431 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 24, 2026 (115 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-09-30

$7,478,076 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2025 — management decision was due December 27, 2025.

FY 2023-09-30

$6,458,992 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2025 — management decision was due December 27, 2025.

2023-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-003

The September 30, 2023, audited financial statements and data collection form for the Organization were not filed within the time required by Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities that expend more than $750,000 or more in a year in federal awards shall have a single audit conducted and Section .320 requires that the audit shall be completed, and the data collection form and reporting package shall be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditors’ report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: The Organization’s filing process to ensure timely filing of the data collection form and the financial statements was attributed to the delay of the audit due to the turnover of staff, thus causing a delay in the submission of the required reports. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form and reporting package will cause an auditee to be determined to be a “high-risk auditee” and could affect future federal grant funding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization improve its year-end closing processes in order to meet all filing requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the finding. The Organization's corrective action plan is included at the end of this report

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: The September 30, 2023, audited financial statements and data collection form for the Organization were not filed within the time required by Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities that expend more than $750,000 or more in a year in federal awards shall have a single audit conducted and Section .320 requires that the audit shall be completed, and the data collection form and reporting package shall be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditors’ report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: The Organization’s filing process to ensure timely filing of the data collection form and the financial statements was attributed to the delay of the audit due to the turnover of staff, thus causing a delay in the submission of the required reports. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form and reporting package will cause an auditee to be determined to be a “high-risk auditee” and could affect future federal grant funding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization improve its year-end closing processes in order to meet all filing requirements. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management acknowledges the finding. The Organization's corrective action plan is included at the end of this report

Corrective Action Plan

Finance team has hired an experience finance supervisor to help improve monthly and year end closing process, so organization can meet all its filing requirements without delays.

Prior Finding References

2022-003

About Reporting →

FY 2022-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$9,378,680 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2025 — management decision was due December 27, 2025.

2022-002
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

During testing eligibility for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (ALN #93.568) the Organization was unable to provide documentation for three of the forty recipients selected for testing. Criteria: Organizations are required to maintain supporting documentation for all recipients receiving grant funding. In addition, there must be periodic reviews to ensure recipients still qualify for assistance. Cause: There was significant turnover within the finance department of the Organization subsequent to year-end, and prior to the start of the audit. For the selected transactions noted above, documentation, support, and records were unable to be located by the new finance team. Effect: Because the Organization was not able to provide documentation for the noted recipients, we were unable to determine whether the grants to the selected recipients were made in accordance with the applicable grant agreements. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its document retention and filing policies to ensure that adequate support is maintained for all recipients receiving federal grants. The Organization should also consider enhancing its accounting policies and procedures manual so that in the event of staff turnover, new employees can understand and follow those policies and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: During testing eligibility for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (ALN #93.568) the Organization was unable to provide documentation for three of the forty recipients selected for testing. Criteria: Organizations are required to maintain supporting documentation for all recipients receiving grant funding. In addition, there must be periodic reviews to ensure recipients still qualify for assistance. Cause: There was significant turnover within the finance department of the Organization subsequent to year-end, and prior to the start of the audit. For the selected transactions noted above, documentation, support, and records were unable to be located by the new finance team. Effect: Because the Organization was not able to provide documentation for the noted recipients, we were unable to determine whether the grants to the selected recipients were made in accordance with the applicable grant agreements. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its document retention and filing policies to ensure that adequate support is maintained for all recipients receiving federal grants. The Organization should also consider enhancing its accounting policies and procedures manual so that in the event of staff turnover, new employees can understand and follow those policies and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

Policies for all programs are being developed by each department and will include random, periodic file audits to ensure eligibility documentation and other mandatory paperwork is maintained for all programs.

About Eligibility →
2022-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-001

The September 30, 2022, audited financial statements and data collection form for the Organization were not filed within the time required by Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities that expend more than $750,000 or more in a year in federal awards shall have a single audit conducted and Section .320 requires that the audit shall be completed, and the data collection form and reporting package shall be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditors’ report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: The Organization’s filing process to ensure timely filing of the data collection form and the financial statements was attributed to the delay of the audit due to the turnover of staff, thus causing a delay in the submission of the required reports. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form and reporting package will cause an auditee to be determined to be a “high-risk auditee” and could affect future federal grant funding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization improve its year-end closing processes in order to meet all filing requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Statement of Condition: The September 30, 2022, audited financial statements and data collection form for the Organization were not filed within the time required by Uniform Guidance. Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires that non-federal entities that expend more than $750,000 or more in a year in federal awards shall have a single audit conducted and Section .320 requires that the audit shall be completed, and the data collection form and reporting package shall be submitted within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditors’ report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Cause: The Organization’s filing process to ensure timely filing of the data collection form and the financial statements was attributed to the delay of the audit due to the turnover of staff, thus causing a delay in the submission of the required reports. Effect: Late filing of the data collection form and reporting package will cause an auditee to be determined to be a “high-risk auditee” and could affect future federal grant funding. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization improve its year-end closing processes in order to meet all filing requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Monthly reconciliations are now completed for all journals, sub journals and accounts. Entry errors are adjusted each period to ensure that account and ledger totals are properly maintained and recorded. The monthly reconciliation of accounts and ledgers identified will minimize any future late filings of required reports.

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Reporting →

FY 2021-09-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,417,955 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 1, 2023.

2021-002
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

During testing of non-payroll expenditures charged to 477 Cluster programs (specifically, Community Services Block Grant or "CSBG," and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families or "TANF"), the Organization was unable to provide documentation for five of the twenty-five expense transactions selected for testing. In addition, during testing of payroll expenditures charged to 477 Cluster programs (specifically, CSBG), for five of the twenty-five payroll transactions selected for testing, the employee positions charged to the grant did not appear in the grant agreement. Further, for ten out of the twenty-five payroll transactions selected, the amount charged exceeded the budget by more than 10%, which requires written approval from the grantor. The Organization was not able to provide the written approval for these overages. Criteria: Organizations are required to maintain relevant and reliable documentation related to expenditures claimed on cost reimbursement grants, including written approval for charges that exceed or fall outside of the program budget. Complete and adequate support should be made available to auditors, regulators, and/or grantors as requested. Cause There was significant turnover within the Finance Department of the Organization subsequent to year-end, and after the audit had started. For the selected transactions noted above, documentation, support, and records were unable to be located by the new Finance team. Effect: Because the Organization was not able to provide documentation for the noted expenditures, we were unable to determine whether the selected expenditures were made in accordance with the applicable grant agreements. Questioned Costs: With respect to the non-payroll expenditures, we identified known questioned costs totaling $8,265, and projected (likely) questioned costs totaling $215,239. For the payroll expenditures, we identified known questioned costs totaling $9,487, and projected (likely) questioned costs totaling $154,613. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its document retention and filing policies to ensure that adequate support is maintained for all expenditures charged to federal grants. The Organization should also consider enhancing its accounting policies and procedures manual so that in the event of staff turnover, new employees are able to understand and follow those policies and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Retention of Documentation to Support Allowable Costs (Material Weakness) Condition: During testing of non-payroll expenditures charged to 477 Cluster programs (specifically, Community Services Block Grant or "CSBG," and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families or "TANF"), the Organization was unable to provide documentation for five of the twenty-five expense transactions selected for testing. In addition, during testing of payroll expenditures charged to 477 Cluster programs (specifically, CSBG), for five of the twenty-five payroll transactions selected for testing, the employee positions charged to the grant did not appear in the grant agreement. Further, for ten out of the twenty-five payroll transactions selected, the amount charged exceeded the budget by more than 10%, which requires written approval from the grantor. The Organization was not able to provide the written approval for these overages. Criteria: Organizations are required to maintain relevant and reliable documentation related to expenditures claimed on cost reimbursement grants, including written approval for charges that exceed or fall outside of the program budget. Complete and adequate support should be made available to auditors, regulators, and/or grantors as requested. Cause There was significant turnover within the Finance Department of the Organization subsequent to year-end, and after the audit had started. For the selected transactions noted above, documentation, support, and records were unable to be located by the new Finance team. Effect: Because the Organization was not able to provide documentation for the noted expenditures, we were unable to determine whether the selected expenditures were made in accordance with the applicable grant agreements. Questioned Costs: With respect to the non-payroll expenditures, we identified known questioned costs totaling $8,265, and projected (likely) questioned costs totaling $215,239. For the payroll expenditures, we identified known questioned costs totaling $9,487, and projected (likely) questioned costs totaling $154,613. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization strengthen its document retention and filing policies to ensure that adequate support is maintained for all expenditures charged to federal grants. The Organization should also consider enhancing its accounting policies and procedures manual so that in the event of staff turnover, new employees are able to understand and follow those policies and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

The Organization has recently hired a new Finance team who will review all practices, policies, and procedures, and provide the necessary training and guidance to ensure that adequate support is maintained for all expenditures charged to federal grants. The team will ensure a better understanding of all information and documentation collected and disseminated, and intends to have all information and documentation prepared in a timely fashion.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2021-003
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

The Organization's data collection form for the year ended September 30, 2021 was not filed within nine months after year-end. Criteria: The Organization is required to submit its data collection form to the federal audit clearinghouse at the earlier date of thirty days after issuance of the financial statements or nine months after year-end. Cause: There was significant turnover within the Finance Department of the Organization subsequent to year-end, and after the audit had started. As a result, the Organization's data collection form was not submitted before its due date. Effect: The Organization's data collection form was filed late. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization allows for sufficient time for submitting its data collection form subsequent to the completion of its annual audit.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Late Filing of Single Audit (Material Weakness) Condition: The Organization's data collection form for the year ended September 30, 2021 was not filed within nine months after year-end. Criteria: The Organization is required to submit its data collection form to the federal audit clearinghouse at the earlier date of thirty days after issuance of the financial statements or nine months after year-end. Cause: There was significant turnover within the Finance Department of the Organization subsequent to year-end, and after the audit had started. As a result, the Organization's data collection form was not submitted before its due date. Effect: The Organization's data collection form was filed late. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Organization allows for sufficient time for submitting its data collection form subsequent to the completion of its annual audit.

Corrective Action Plan

The Organization intends to file its 2022 Data Collection Form prior to its due date.

About Reporting →

FY 2020-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,092,540 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2021 — management decision was due October 6, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,168,802 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 6, 2020 — management decision was due October 6, 2020.

FY 2018-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,773,535 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2019 — management decision was due October 2, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,949,640 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 21, 2018 — management decision was due November 21, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

$7,895,509 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 19, 2017 — management decision was due October 19, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Rhode Island

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.