← Back to home

HORIZON HEALTH CARE, INCNon-Profit

EIN: 460341255

UEI: WQNTL7JUEWY7

Audited by: Casey Peterson, LTD

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

HORIZON HEALTH CARE, INC10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$10.8M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

$10,762,123 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 14, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 14, 2027 (160 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,713,376 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 28, 2025 — management decision was due November 28, 2025.

2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

2024-001 Noncompliance – Application of SFS Discount Federal Programs – 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Cluster Criteria – Horizon is required to have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover the reasonable costs of operation. The corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted should be based on a patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised by the U.S. Department of Health and Human services. Condition – During our testing of the Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS), we noted Horizon properly had a SFS schedule whereby the basis of the patient’s ability to pay is based upon the patient’s income, using the federal poverty guidelines as a basis for the percentage of the SFS discount. We tested a total of forty patient visits that received SFS adjustment and noted one of those visits tested was not handled in accordance with Horizon’s SFS policies and procedures. Cause – Horizon did not follow policies and procedures set in place to ensure SFS discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Context – In one of the forty patient files tested, the sliding fee adjustment was improperly calculated and was not later corrected. Effect or Potential Effect – The SFS discount applied is incorrect. Questioned costs – None noted. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Management should review policies and procedures regarding the SFS program with staff that is responsible for determining the SFS discount. View of Responsible Officials – Management recognized the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 Noncompliance – Application of SFS Discount Federal Programs – 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Cluster Criteria – Horizon is required to have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover the reasonable costs of operation. The corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted should be based on a patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised by the U.S. Department of Health and Human services. Condition – During our testing of the Sliding Fee Schedule (SFS), we noted Horizon properly had a SFS schedule whereby the basis of the patient’s ability to pay is based upon the patient’s income, using the federal poverty guidelines as a basis for the percentage of the SFS discount. We tested a total of forty patient visits that received SFS adjustment and noted one of those visits tested was not handled in accordance with Horizon’s SFS policies and procedures. Cause – Horizon did not follow policies and procedures set in place to ensure SFS discount is correctly determined and applied to patient accounts. Context – In one of the forty patient files tested, the sliding fee adjustment was improperly calculated and was not later corrected. Effect or Potential Effect – The SFS discount applied is incorrect. Questioned costs – None noted. Repeat Finding – This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation – Management should review policies and procedures regarding the SFS program with staff that is responsible for determining the SFS discount. View of Responsible Officials – Management recognized the deficiency and plans to implement the auditor’s recommendation.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-001 – Noncompliance – Application of SFS Discount Federal Programs – 93.224 & 93.527 Health Center Cluster Person responsible for corrective action – Wade Erickson, Chief Executive Officer Responsible official’s response – Management is in agreement with this finding. Corrective action planned – Our current process for reviewing and approving SFS applications was trained upon and implemented with our Patient Enrollment Services staff. Additional internal reviews will be completed to ensure these new processes are being followed by Patient Enrollment Services staff members. Planned implementation date of corrective action – December 2025

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,114,914 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2024 — management decision was due December 20, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,712,821 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 25, 2023 — management decision was due January 25, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,496,054 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 25, 2022 — management decision was due November 25, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,472,777 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 24, 2021 — management decision was due February 24, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

$10,154,632 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 31, 2020 — management decision was due December 1, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

$9,800,587 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 14, 2019 — management decision was due November 14, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,903,631 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 3, 2018 — management decision was due December 3, 2018.

2017-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,911,588 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 12, 2017 — management decision was due January 12, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in South Dakota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.