← Back to home

SPRUCE ROOT, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 454295940

UEI: WHSCX3H9LN69

Audited by: McDonald Jacobs, P.C.

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

SPRUCE ROOT, INC.5 audit years3 findings
5
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,106,501 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 23, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 23, 2026 (112 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

$2,038,680 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 18, 2025 — management decision was due December 18, 2025.

FY 2023-12-31

$2,008,838 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 12, 2024 — management decision was due December 12, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

$1,268,070 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 9, 2023 — management decision was due January 9, 2024.

2022-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

USDA?s review of submitted reports, SF-270 and SF-425, identified various adjustments due to disallowed expenses included or insufficient supporting documentation for expenses incurred. Cause: Expenses incurred by the Organization and its subrecipients were not reviewed for allowability before requesting reimbursement and expenditure reporting. Effect: Disallowed costs could be charged to contracts. Questioned Costs: Approximately $15,000 Recommendation: The Organization should implement an additional review of expenses when preparing request for reimbursement and expenditure reports. Management Response: Management will enhance its review of expenditures before submitting to funders for reimbursement.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding # 2022-001 Type: Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number: U.S. Department of Agriculture ? Rural Development 10.755 Rural Innovation Stronger Economy U.S. Department of the Treasury 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria/Requirement: Expenses should be reviewed for allowability of costs before requesting reimbursement. Condition: USDA?s review of submitted reports, SF-270 and SF-425, identified various adjustments due to disallowed expenses included or insufficient supporting documentation for expenses incurred. Cause: Expenses incurred by the Organization and its subrecipients were not reviewed for allowability before requesting reimbursement and expenditure reporting. Effect: Disallowed costs could be charged to contracts. Questioned Costs: Approximately $15,000 Recommendation: The Organization should implement an additional review of expenses when preparing request for reimbursement and expenditure reports. Management Response: Management will enhance its review of expenditures before submitting to funders for reimbursement.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding # 2022-001 Noncompliance over allowability of costs U.S. Department of Agriculture ? Rural Development 10.755 Rural Innovation Stronger Economy U.S. Department of the Treasury 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Finding: USDA?s review of submitted reports, SF-270 and SF-425, identified various adjustments due to disallowed expenses included or insufficient supporting documentation for expenses incurred. Recommendation: The Organization should implement an additional review of expenses when preparing request for reimbursement and expenditure reports. Corrective Action: Spruce Root will enhance its review of expenditures before submitting to funders for reimbursement. Anticipated Completion Date December 31, 2023

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →
2022-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

The procurement process was not properly documented and executed. For two out of two samples selected for testing, there was no documentation of the procurement process performed or reviewed. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not meet the required federal standards, and application of the policy was not consistently applied. Effect: The Organization?s contracts could be from disbarred or disallowed vendors. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization's procurement policy must have documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The Organization should maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Management Response: Management will review the federal procurement guidelines and update its policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding # 2022-002 Type: Immaterial Noncompliance over Procurement Assistance Listing Number: U.S. Department of Agriculture - Rural Development 10.755 Rural Innovation Stronger Economy U.S. Department of the Treasury 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Criteria/Requirement: The Organization should follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 including documentation to justify when a competitive process was not used. The Organization?s procurement policies also should be expanded to incorporate the provisions of the standards referenced. Condition: The procurement process was not properly documented and executed. For two out of two samples selected for testing, there was no documentation of the procurement process performed or reviewed. Cause: The Organization?s procurement policy does not meet the required federal standards, and application of the policy was not consistently applied. Effect: The Organization?s contracts could be from disbarred or disallowed vendors. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization's procurement policy must have documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The Organization should maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Management Response: Management will review the federal procurement guidelines and update its policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding # 2022-002 Immaterial noncompliance over procurement U.S. Department of Agriculture ? Rural Development 10.755 Rural Innovation Stronger Economy U.S. Department of the Treasury 21.027 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Finding: The Organization should follow the procurement standards set out at 2 CFR sections 200.318 through 200.326 including documentation to justify when a competitive process was not used. The Organization?s procurement policies also should be expanded to incorporate the provisions of the standards referenced. Recommendation: The Organization's procurement policy must have documented procurement procedures, consistent with state, local, and tribal laws and regulations for the acquisition of property or services required under a federal award or subaward. The Organization should maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. Corrective Action: Spruce Root will review the federal procurement guidelines and update its policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements. Anticipated Completion Date December 31, 2023

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2022-003
Subrecipient Monitoring
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

The Organization?s subrecipient agreements did not include the required federal award identification, and the Organization did not provide sufficient financial monitoring. One subrecipient had a single audit finding, and management did not take actions to resolve the findings with the subrecipient. Cause: There are no formal policies for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Subrecipients could be out of compliance with federal guidelines if the required federal award information was not clearly defined in subaward agreements or if the Organization does not monitor the subrecipient?s use of federal funds. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a subrecipient monitoring policy that ensure a proper system to monitor, detect and take timely follow-up action on any issues identified in site visits and internal or external audits. Management should evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward and monitor the activities of the subrecipient to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes. The Organization should consider on-site reviews of the subrecipient?s operations and formalizing a monitoring report checklist to ensure that all compliance requirements have been considered and documented. Management Response: Management will review the federal subrecipient monitoring and management guidelines and update its policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements. Management will issue contract amendments for its subrecipient agreements to ensure the proper federal award identification is documented.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding # 2022-003 Type: Material Weakness over Subrecipient Monitoring Type: Material Noncompliance Assistance Listing Number: U.S. Department of Agriculture - Rural Development 10.755 Rural Innovation Stronger Economy Criteria/Requirement: The Organization is required to monitor activities of subrecipients in accordance with federal regulations. Condition: The Organization?s subrecipient agreements did not include the required federal award identification, and the Organization did not provide sufficient financial monitoring. One subrecipient had a single audit finding, and management did not take actions to resolve the findings with the subrecipient. Cause: There are no formal policies for subrecipient monitoring. Effect: Subrecipients could be out of compliance with federal guidelines if the required federal award information was not clearly defined in subaward agreements or if the Organization does not monitor the subrecipient?s use of federal funds. Questioned Costs: None. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a subrecipient monitoring policy that ensure a proper system to monitor, detect and take timely follow-up action on any issues identified in site visits and internal or external audits. Management should evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward and monitor the activities of the subrecipient to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes. The Organization should consider on-site reviews of the subrecipient?s operations and formalizing a monitoring report checklist to ensure that all compliance requirements have been considered and documented. Management Response: Management will review the federal subrecipient monitoring and management guidelines and update its policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements. Management will issue contract amendments for its subrecipient agreements to ensure the proper federal award identification is documented.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding # 2022-003 Material weakness over subrecipient monitoring U.S. Department of Agriculture ? Rural Development 10.755 Rural Innovation Stronger Economy Finding: The Organization?s subrecipient agreements did not include the required federal award identification, and the Organization did not provide sufficient financial monitoring of its subrecipients. One subrecipient had a single audit finding, and management did not take actions to resolve the findings with the subrecipient. Recommendation: The Organization should implement a subrecipient monitoring policy that ensure a proper system to monitor, detect and take timely follow-up action on any issues identified in site visits and internal or external audits. Management should evaluate each subrecipient's risk of noncompliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward and monitor the activities of the subrecipient to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes. The Organization should consider on-site reviews of the subrecipient?s operations and formalizing a monitoring report checklist to ensure that all compliance requirements have been considered and documented. Corrective Action: Spruce Root will review the federal subrecipient monitoring and management guidelines and update its policies and procedures to be consistent with federal requirements. Spruce Root will issue contract amendments for its subrecipient agreements to ensure the proper federal award identification is documented. Anticipated Completion Date December 31, 2023

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2021-12-31

$1,840,507 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Oregon

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.