← Back to home

COMMUNITY MEDICAL WELLNESS CENTERS, USANon-Profit

EIN: 452424322

UEI: KTMBGKCVCMU1

Audited by: CHW LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

COMMUNITY MEDICAL WELLNESS CENTERS, USA9 audit years9 findings2 repeat
9
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$1.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,860,164 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 28, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 28, 2027 (151 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-001OTHER MATTERS

In our sample of 40 tested items, incorrect sliding fee discounts were provided in 10 samples. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: Lack of strict enforcement of the policy of sliding fee eligibility determination and compliance may have resulted in the Organization providing discounted services greater to or less than the appropriate amounts to beneficiaries. Cause: Inadequate understanding of the sliding fee program requirements and Organization policies by employees involved in sliding fee determination and billing. Recommendation: Training should be provided to employees on the sliding fee program requirements. The Organization should perform regular audits of sliding fee transactions to identify weaknesses in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Organization agrees with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure that this does not recur. Please refer to the corrective action plan on page 35.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-001 Sliding Fee Discount Determination CFDA Number: 93.224 Program: Community Health Center Cluster Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: N Special Tests and Provisions Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: Federal grant compliance provisions require that the Organization correctly identify a patient's ability to pay and that the rates for services be adjusted accordingly based on the sliding fee schedule. The Organization is required to follow its sliding fee policy when providing discounts to eligible patients. Finding/ Condition: In our sample of 40 tested items, incorrect sliding fee discounts were provided in 10 samples. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: Lack of strict enforcement of the policy of sliding fee eligibility determination and compliance may have resulted in the Organization providing discounted services greater to or less than the appropriate amounts to beneficiaries. Cause: Inadequate understanding of the sliding fee program requirements and Organization policies by employees involved in sliding fee determination and billing. Recommendation: Training should be provided to employees on the sliding fee program requirements. The Organization should perform regular audits of sliding fee transactions to identify weaknesses in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Organization agrees with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure that this does not recur. Please refer to the corrective action plan on page 35.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-001 Sliding Fee Discount Determination Name of Contact Person: Chief Financial Officer: Ahmed Zibare Corrective Action: Community Medical Wellness Centers USA: • Is providing immediate re-training to staff on issues identified. • Continues to provide ongoing training to current and new staff involved in Sliding Fee Discount Program (SFDP) on program requirements and proper implementation of sliding fee determination and billing. • Will continue ongoing Sliding Fee Audits to assess staff knowledge, provide feedback, and offer guidance, as needed. Proposed Completion Date: September 30, 2026

Prior Finding References

2024-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing of the Organization’s procurement transactions for federal purchases (25 samples), we noted the Organization could not provide a sufficient history of the procurement decisions including the method of procurement and contractor selection. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: The entity is not in compliance with 45 CFR 75.327 for procurement. Cause: The Organization did not have procedures in place for procurement in retaining the required documentation detailing the history of the procurement. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization develop procedures for procurement with federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Organization will develop a system that maintains the required documentation for procurements in a centralized location. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan on page 35.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Procurement Suspension and Debarment ALN: 93.224 Program: Community Health Center Cluster Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: I Procurement Suspension and Debarment Repeat Finding: No Criteria: Per 45 CFR 75.327(i), a non-Federal entity who receives HHS awards must maintain records sufficient to detail the history of procurement. These records will include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: rationale for the method of procurement, selection of contract type, contractor selection or rejection, and the basis for the contract price. Finding/Condition: During our testing of the Organization’s procurement transactions for federal purchases (25 samples), we noted the Organization could not provide a sufficient history of the procurement decisions including the method of procurement and contractor selection. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: The entity is not in compliance with 45 CFR 75.327 for procurement. Cause: The Organization did not have procedures in place for procurement in retaining the required documentation detailing the history of the procurement. Recommendation: We recommend the Organization develop procedures for procurement with federal funds. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Organization will develop a system that maintains the required documentation for procurements in a centralized location. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan on page 35.

Corrective Action Plan

2025-002 Procurement Suspension and Debarment Name of Contact Person: Chief Financial Officer: Ahmed Zibare Corrective Action: Community Medical Wellness Centers USA will develop a system that maintains the required documentation for procurements in a centralized location. Proposed Completion Date: September 30, 2026

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,272,945 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 2, 2025 — management decision was due March 2, 2026.

2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-001OTHER MATTERS

In our sample of 40 tested items, in multiple samples patient information was inadequate to determine the proper sliding fee discount. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: Lack of strict enforcement of the policy of sliding fee eligibility determination and compliance may have resulted in the Organization providing discounted services greater to or less than the appropriate amounts to beneficiaries. Cause: Inadequate understanding of the sliding fee program requirements and Organization policies by employees involved in sliding fee determination and billing. Recommendation: Training should be provided to employees on the sliding fee program requirements. The Organization should perform regular audits of sliding fee transactions to identify weaknesses in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Organization agrees with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure that this does not recur. Please refer to the corrective action plan on page 33.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001 Sliding Fee Discount Determination CFDA Number: 93.224 Program: Community Health Center Cluster Agency: US Department of Health and Human Services Compliance Requirement: N- Special Tests and Provisions Repeat Finding: Yes Criteria: Federal grant compliance provisions require that the Organization correctly identify a patient's ability to pay and that the rates for services be adjusted accordingly based on the sliding fee schedule. The Organization is required to follow its sliding fee policy when providing discounts to eligible patients. Finding/ Condition: In our sample of 40 tested items, in multiple samples patient information was inadequate to determine the proper sliding fee discount. Questioned Cost: None. Effect: Lack of strict enforcement of the policy of sliding fee eligibility determination and compliance may have resulted in the Organization providing discounted services greater to or less than the appropriate amounts to beneficiaries. Cause: Inadequate understanding of the sliding fee program requirements and Organization policies by employees involved in sliding fee determination and billing. Recommendation: Training should be provided to employees on the sliding fee program requirements. The Organization should perform regular audits of sliding fee transactions to identify weaknesses in compliance. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Action Plan: The Organization agrees with the finding and will implement additional controls to ensure that this does not recur. Please refer to the corrective action plan on page 33.

Corrective Action Plan

2024-001 Sliding Fee Discount Determination Name of Contact Person: Chief Financial Officer: Ahmed Zibare Corrective Action: Community Medical Wellness Centers USA: • Is providing immediate re-training to staff on issues identified beginning September 1, 2025. • Continues to provide ongoing training to current and new staff involved in Sliding Fee Discount Program (SFDP) on program requirements and proper implementation of sliding fee determination and billing. • Will continue ongoing Sliding Fee Audits to assess staff knowledge, provide feedback, and offer guidance, as needed. Proposed Completion Date: October 31, 2025

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,476,884 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

2023-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Finding No.2023-001: Inaccurate Application of Sliding fee Discounts (Significant Deficiency) Assistance Listing Number: 93.829 Assistance Listing Program Title: Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Passed Through Entity: Not applicable Federal Award Number: 1H79SM085136-01 Federal Award Year: August 31, 2021 – August 30, 2023 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Sliding Fee Discounts Criteria or Specific Requirements Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The poverty guidelines are issued each year in the Federal Register and HHS maintains a web page that provides the poverty guidelines. Non-grant funds (State, local, and other operational funding and fees, premiums, and third-party reimbursements which the project may reasonably be expected to receive, including any such funds in excess of those originally expected), shall be used as permitted under the law and may be used for such other purposes as are not specifically prohibited under the law if such use furthers the objectives of the project. Condition The Organization determines the amount of fees to be charged to a patient based on the patient’s income, expense, and number of dependents in conjunction with the sliding fee schedule. Of the 25 patients selected for testing, we noted the following: - 4 patients were charged the incorrect sliding fee amount, which resulted in the Organization overcharging 2 patients by $10 each, while 2 patients were undercharged by $5 each. - 4 patients had no proof of income declaration and sliding fee application form on file. Due to an unsupported sliding fee discount, we were unable to determine if these 4 patients were eligible for the sliding fee and should have been charged the full amount totaling $523.48. Questioned Costs $513.48 in net undercharges for sliding fee patients sampled. Causes and Effect The potential cause for the above errors is as follows: - Error by staff in determining the patient’s ability to pay. - Lack of review and retention of sliding fee applications and income declaration forms. - Patients did not complete the required form necessary to determine the patient’s ability to pay. As a result, the determination of patient fees is not consistent with the sliding fee schedule. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization’s controls and procedures be strengthened to ensure 1) income declaration is properly verified and adequately documented and 2) the sliding fee discount is properly determined and applied. The Organization should also provide additional training to staff involved in the sliding fee process and ensure that appropriate individuals are properly monitoring and reviewing the Organization’s compliance with program requirements. This will help ensure that the proper sliding fee is charged to patients and that program goals and objectives are being met.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding No.2023-001: Inaccurate Application of Sliding fee Discounts (Significant Deficiency) Assistance Listing Number: 93.829 Assistance Listing Program Title: Section 223 Demonstration Programs to Improve Community Mental Health Services. Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) Passed Through Entity: Not applicable Federal Award Number: 1H79SM085136-01 Federal Award Year: August 31, 2021 – August 30, 2023 Compliance Requirement: Special Tests and Provisions – Sliding Fee Discounts Criteria or Specific Requirements Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient’s ability to pay. The patient’s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The poverty guidelines are issued each year in the Federal Register and HHS maintains a web page that provides the poverty guidelines. Non-grant funds (State, local, and other operational funding and fees, premiums, and third-party reimbursements which the project may reasonably be expected to receive, including any such funds in excess of those originally expected), shall be used as permitted under the law and may be used for such other purposes as are not specifically prohibited under the law if such use furthers the objectives of the project. Condition The Organization determines the amount of fees to be charged to a patient based on the patient’s income, expense, and number of dependents in conjunction with the sliding fee schedule. Of the 25 patients selected for testing, we noted the following: - 4 patients were charged the incorrect sliding fee amount, which resulted in the Organization overcharging 2 patients by $10 each, while 2 patients were undercharged by $5 each. - 4 patients had no proof of income declaration and sliding fee application form on file. Due to an unsupported sliding fee discount, we were unable to determine if these 4 patients were eligible for the sliding fee and should have been charged the full amount totaling $523.48. Questioned Costs $513.48 in net undercharges for sliding fee patients sampled. Causes and Effect The potential cause for the above errors is as follows: - Error by staff in determining the patient’s ability to pay. - Lack of review and retention of sliding fee applications and income declaration forms. - Patients did not complete the required form necessary to determine the patient’s ability to pay. As a result, the determination of patient fees is not consistent with the sliding fee schedule. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization’s controls and procedures be strengthened to ensure 1) income declaration is properly verified and adequately documented and 2) the sliding fee discount is properly determined and applied. The Organization should also provide additional training to staff involved in the sliding fee process and ensure that appropriate individuals are properly monitoring and reviewing the Organization’s compliance with program requirements. This will help ensure that the proper sliding fee is charged to patients and that program goals and objectives are being met.

Corrective Action Plan

Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization have experienced turnover of staff in the Organization as well as changes in leadership. In response to this finding the Organization has put together a corrective action plan that targets training of staff and puts into place a monthly audit for ensuring compliance to the sliding fee discount policy. Responsible persons: Nichole Henderson, Quality Improvement Quality Assurance Director and Demetria Johnson, Billing Manager will be in charge of implementing the corrective action. Expected Implementation Date: Started August 1, 2024.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$4,472,160 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 1, 2023 — management decision was due April 1, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

$2,448,499 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 1, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

$1,856,945 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2021 — management decision was due April 27, 2022.

2020-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Criteria or Specific Requirement Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by HHS. The poverty guidelines are issued each year in the Federal Register and HHS maintains a web page that provides the poverty guidelines. Non-grant funds (State, local, and other operational funding and fees, premiums, and third-party reimbursements which the project may reasonably be expected to receive, including any such funds in excess of those originally expected), shall be used as permitted under the law and may be used for such other purposes as are not specifically prohibited under the law if such use furthers the objectives of the project. Condition The Organization determines the amount of fees to be charged to a patient based on the patient?s income, expense and number of dependents in conjunction with the sliding fee schedule. Of the 60 patients selected for testwork, we noted 14 patients that were charged the incorrect sliding fee amount, which resulted in the Organization overcharging 10 patients by $105, while 4 patients were undercharged by $105. Questioned Costs $0 in net charges for sliding fee patients sampled.The potential causes for the above errors are as follows: ? Error by staff in determining the patient?s ability to pay. ? Patients did not complete the required form necessary to determine patient?s ability to pay. As a result, the determination of patients fees are not consistent with the sliding fee schedule. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization?s controls and procedures be strengthened to ensure 1) income declaration is properly verified and adequately documented and 2) the sliding fee discount is properly determined and applied. The Organization should also provide additional training to staff involved in the sliding fee process and ensure that appropriate individuals are properly monitoring and reviewing the Organization?s compliance with program requirements. This will help ensure that the proper sliding fee is charged to patients and that program goals and objectives are being met.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria or Specific Requirement Health centers must have a schedule of fees or payments for the provision of their health services consistent with locally prevailing rates or charges and designed to cover their reasonable costs of operation. They are also required to have a corresponding schedule of discounts applied and adjusted based on the patient?s ability to pay. The patient?s ability to pay is determined based on the official poverty guidelines, as revised annually by HHS. The poverty guidelines are issued each year in the Federal Register and HHS maintains a web page that provides the poverty guidelines. Non-grant funds (State, local, and other operational funding and fees, premiums, and third-party reimbursements which the project may reasonably be expected to receive, including any such funds in excess of those originally expected), shall be used as permitted under the law and may be used for such other purposes as are not specifically prohibited under the law if such use furthers the objectives of the project. Condition The Organization determines the amount of fees to be charged to a patient based on the patient?s income, expense and number of dependents in conjunction with the sliding fee schedule. Of the 60 patients selected for testwork, we noted 14 patients that were charged the incorrect sliding fee amount, which resulted in the Organization overcharging 10 patients by $105, while 4 patients were undercharged by $105. Questioned Costs $0 in net charges for sliding fee patients sampled.The potential causes for the above errors are as follows: ? Error by staff in determining the patient?s ability to pay. ? Patients did not complete the required form necessary to determine patient?s ability to pay. As a result, the determination of patients fees are not consistent with the sliding fee schedule. Recommendation We recommend that the Organization?s controls and procedures be strengthened to ensure 1) income declaration is properly verified and adequately documented and 2) the sliding fee discount is properly determined and applied. The Organization should also provide additional training to staff involved in the sliding fee process and ensure that appropriate individuals are properly monitoring and reviewing the Organization?s compliance with program requirements. This will help ensure that the proper sliding fee is charged to patients and that program goals and objectives are being met.

Corrective Action Plan

The Organization is continuing to train and emphasize the importance of properly adhering to the HRSA compliance manual and the Sliding Fee Discount Program (SFDP) policy. Responsible persons: Paul Ramos, Chief Financial Officer and Sompia Paigne, Chief Executive Officer Expected Implementation Date: January 31, 2021

About Other →

FY 2019-12-31

$1,041,530 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 21, 2020 — management decision was due October 21, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

$798,236 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 1, 2020 — management decision was due July 1, 2020.

2018-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2018-002
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2018-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2017-12-31

$816,033 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 1, 2019 — management decision was due January 1, 2020.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in California

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.