← Back to home

SOURIS BASIN PLANNING COUNCILLocal Government

EIN: 450321353

UEI: ZTMNY421QFR5

Audited by: Wohlenberg Ritzman & Co., LLC

Oversight agency: 11 [Department of Commerce]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

SOURIS BASIN PLANNING COUNCIL8 audit years2 findings1 repeat
8
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,501,206 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 17, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 17, 2027 (170 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing of the reporting compliance requirement, we noted that the Executive Director prepares the profit and loss detail used to complete the Federal Financial Report (SF-425), completes the SF-425, and submits the report to the Economic Development Administration. An independent review of the completed SF-425 is not performed prior to submission. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: Based on the terms and conditions of the Economic Adjustment Assistance (EDA) grant award, Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) are required to be submitted to the Economic Development Administration (EDA) on a semi-annual basis. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.303, the entity is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance the award is managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Such controls should include an independent review of required federal reports prior to submission. Cause: The entity has not established a formal review process over the preparation and submission of the SF-425. As a result, responsibility for preparing, reviewing, and submitting the report is concentrated with one individual. Effect: Without an independent review of the SF-425 prior to submission, errors or omissions may not be identified before the report is submitted to the federal awarding agency. This increases the risk that inaccurate or incomplete financial information could be reported. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen internal controls over the preparation and submission of the SF-425 by assigning preparation of the report to the Program and Finance Manager. The Executive Director should independently review the completed SF-425 for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with grant reporting requirements prior to submission. The review should be documented to provide evidence that the control was performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-001 – Reporting Significant Deficiency Condition: During our testing of the reporting compliance requirement, we noted that the Executive Director prepares the profit and loss detail used to complete the Federal Financial Report (SF-425), completes the SF-425, and submits the report to the Economic Development Administration. An independent review of the completed SF-425 is not performed prior to submission. Questioned Costs: None. Criteria: Based on the terms and conditions of the Economic Adjustment Assistance (EDA) grant award, Federal Financial Reports (SF-425) are required to be submitted to the Economic Development Administration (EDA) on a semi-annual basis. In accordance with 2 CFR § 200.303, the entity is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance the award is managed in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award. Such controls should include an independent review of required federal reports prior to submission. Cause: The entity has not established a formal review process over the preparation and submission of the SF-425. As a result, responsibility for preparing, reviewing, and submitting the report is concentrated with one individual. Effect: Without an independent review of the SF-425 prior to submission, errors or omissions may not be identified before the report is submitted to the federal awarding agency. This increases the risk that inaccurate or incomplete financial information could be reported. Recommendation: We recommend that management strengthen internal controls over the preparation and submission of the SF-425 by assigning preparation of the report to the Program and Finance Manager. The Executive Director should independently review the completed SF-425 for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with grant reporting requirements prior to submission. The review should be documented to provide evidence that the control was performed. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding. Please refer to the Corrective Action Plan for management’s views and planned corrective action.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan – December 31, 2025 2025-001 Contact Person: Beth Calderon, Program & Finance Manager Corrective Action Plan: During 2026, the Council implemented a formal review process for the preparation and submission of the Federal Financial Report (SF-425). The Program & Finance Manager prepares the SF-425 and supporting documentation, and the Organizational Development & Program Manager performs and documents an independent review of the completed report for accuracy, completeness, and compliance with grant reporting requirements prior to submission. This process was implemented to strengthen internal controls over federal reporting and provide appropriate segregation of duties. Completion Date: July 14, 2026 Briselda Hernandez Executive Director

About Reporting →

FY 2024-12-31

$1,543,737 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 25, 2025 — management decision was due February 25, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

$3,167,260 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2024 — management decision was due March 29, 2025.

2022-001
Other
REPEAT OF 2022-001OTHER MATTERS

The audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 were not submitted to the Federal Clearinghouse by the due date of September 30, 2023. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200-512, an entity expending more than $750,000 of federal funds within a fiscal year must submit the data collection form and reporting package by a due date that is the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) or nine months after the year end of the audit period. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Council was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, which could lead to sanctions by the funding agencies. Cause: The Council did not provide documentation in a timely manner, causing delays in preparing for the audit. The delays resulted in the Council not meeting the required timeframe for filing the annual reporting package and data collection form. Recommendation: We recommend the Council should establish a timely process to ensure completion of the audit by September 30 of each year. Response: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001: Single Audit Report Filed Late Condition: The audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022 were not submitted to the Federal Clearinghouse by the due date of September 30, 2023. Criteria: In accordance with 2 CFR Section 200-512, an entity expending more than $750,000 of federal funds within a fiscal year must submit the data collection form and reporting package by a due date that is the earlier of 30 calendar days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s) or nine months after the year end of the audit period. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: The Council was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance, which could lead to sanctions by the funding agencies. Cause: The Council did not provide documentation in a timely manner, causing delays in preparing for the audit. The delays resulted in the Council not meeting the required timeframe for filing the annual reporting package and data collection form. Recommendation: We recommend the Council should establish a timely process to ensure completion of the audit by September 30 of each year. Response: See the corrective action plan that accompanies the schedule of findings and questioned costs.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Plan – December 31,2022 2022-001 Contact Person: Briselda Hernandez, Executive Director Corrective Action Plan: Future audits will be conducted earlier so the reporting deadline can be met. Additionally, Brady Martz will provide audit support to ensure SBPC is prepared beforehand and during the audit. Completion Date: SBPC will continue to work with Brady Martz as long as it remains cost effective.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Other →

FY 2021-12-31

UNMODIFIED OPINION, QUALIFIED OPINIONMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$4,526,226 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 8, 2023 — management decision was due December 8, 2023.

FY 2019-12-31

$1,642,423 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 23, 2020 — management decision was due February 23, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

$1,816,356 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 2, 2019 — management decision was due April 2, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

$1,591,869 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 5, 2018 — management decision was due February 5, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

$1,607,554 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2017 — management decision was due March 24, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Dakota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.