← Back to home

UNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGETribal Government

EIN: 450314233

UEI: G81MSXW3MJR3

Audited by: BRADY MARTZ

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

UNITED TRIBES TECHNICAL COLLEGE10 audit years18 findings5 repeat
10
Audit Years
18
Total Findings
5
Repeat Findings
$28.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$28,680,034 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 29, 2026 (27 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-002OTHER MATTERS

Significant Deficiency – Debt Service Reserve Fund – Special Tests & Provisions Federal Awards 10.766 – Community Facilities Loans and Grants Condition The loan agreement with the USDA requires a debt service reserve fund equal to at least 10% of one annual loan installment that accumulates at the rate of 10% of one annual payment per year for ten years or until the balance is equal to one annual loan payment. Funds cannot be disbursed from the debt service reserve fund without the approval of USDA beforehand. Criteria During our audit, we noted the College disbursed funds from the debt service reserve fund without the approval of USDA. Cause The College set up the fund to make annual principal payments. They did not understand that the fund was for future reserves. Effect The College was not in compliance with the loan agreement. Recommendation We recommend the College not disburse funds from the debt service reserve fund without the approval of USDA in accordance with the loan agreement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The USDA loan was paid in full on December 10, 2025. Indication of Repeat Finding This is a repeat of finding 2024-002.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant Deficiency – Debt Service Reserve Fund – Special Tests & Provisions Federal Awards 10.766 – Community Facilities Loans and Grants Condition The loan agreement with the USDA requires a debt service reserve fund equal to at least 10% of one annual loan installment that accumulates at the rate of 10% of one annual payment per year for ten years or until the balance is equal to one annual loan payment. Funds cannot be disbursed from the debt service reserve fund without the approval of USDA beforehand. Criteria During our audit, we noted the College disbursed funds from the debt service reserve fund without the approval of USDA. Cause The College set up the fund to make annual principal payments. They did not understand that the fund was for future reserves. Effect The College was not in compliance with the loan agreement. Recommendation We recommend the College not disburse funds from the debt service reserve fund without the approval of USDA in accordance with the loan agreement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The USDA loan was paid in full on December 10, 2025. Indication of Repeat Finding This is a repeat of finding 2024-002.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend the College not disburse funds from the debt service reserve fund without the approval of USDA in accordance with the loan agreement. Action Taken: The USDA loan was paid in full on December 10, 2025.

Prior Finding References

2024-002

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

$28,528,139 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.

2024-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Federal Awards 10.766 – Community Facilities Loans and Grants Condition The loan agreement with the USDA requires a debt service reserve fund equal to at least 10% of one annual loan installment that accumulates at the rate of 10% of one annual payment per year for ten years or until the balance is equal to one annual loan payment. Criteria: During our audit, we noted the College did not set up a debt reserve fund. Cause: The College did not set up a debt reserve fund for the USDA loan. Effect: The College was not in compliance with the loan agreement. Recommendation: We recommend the College set up a debt reserve fund in accordance with the loan agreement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Account has been created and payment has been made.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Awards 10.766 – Community Facilities Loans and Grants Condition The loan agreement with the USDA requires a debt service reserve fund equal to at least 10% of one annual loan installment that accumulates at the rate of 10% of one annual payment per year for ten years or until the balance is equal to one annual loan payment. Criteria: During our audit, we noted the College did not set up a debt reserve fund. Cause: The College did not set up a debt reserve fund for the USDA loan. Effect: The College was not in compliance with the loan agreement. Recommendation: We recommend the College set up a debt reserve fund in accordance with the loan agreement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Account has been created and payment has been made.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend the College set up a debt reserve fund in accordance with the loan agreement. Action Taken: The College met with the lending agency regarding debt reserve fund account and reporting process. A debt reserve account has been established in accordance with the loan agreement.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2024-003
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Awards 84.245A – Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Career and Technical Institutions Condition The College should charge costs to the grant which are allowable. Also, documentation should be kept that supports that employees are being paid the correct amounts based on approved rates to ensure only approved amounts are charged to the grant. Criteria: Of the 25 payroll transactions tested, we noted one instance where payroll was misallocated to the grant. Cause: The College did not properly execute its policies and procedures for review of payroll disbursements. Effect: Grant awards potentially overcharged. Questioned Costs: $9,827 Recommendation: We recommend the College follow and properly execute its procedures it has in place relating to payroll expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Training has been provided and journal entries will be reviewed prior to posting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Awards 84.245A – Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Career and Technical Institutions Condition The College should charge costs to the grant which are allowable. Also, documentation should be kept that supports that employees are being paid the correct amounts based on approved rates to ensure only approved amounts are charged to the grant. Criteria: Of the 25 payroll transactions tested, we noted one instance where payroll was misallocated to the grant. Cause: The College did not properly execute its policies and procedures for review of payroll disbursements. Effect: Grant awards potentially overcharged. Questioned Costs: $9,827 Recommendation: We recommend the College follow and properly execute its procedures it has in place relating to payroll expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Training has been provided and journal entries will be reviewed prior to posting.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend the College follow and properly execute its procedures it has in place relating to payroll expenditures. Action Taken: The Finance department will review and ensure all payroll entries and payroll corrections are properly documented prior to making journal entries.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2024-004
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTS

Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Awards 84.245 – Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Career and Technical Institutions Condition The College should charge costs to the grant which are allowable. Also, documentation should be kept that supports that disbursements are being made in the correct amounts based on invoices to ensure only approved amounts are charged to the grant. Criteria: Of the 15 non-payroll transactions tested, we noted one instance where the disbursement was misallocated to the grant. Cause: The College did not properly execute its policies and procedures for reviewing non-payroll disbursements. Effect: Grant awards potentially overcharged. Questioned Costs: $127 Recommendation: We recommend the College follow and properly execute its procedures it has in place relating to non-payroll expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Staff has been hired and trained. Journal entries will be reviewed prior to posting.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Significant Deficiency – Allowable Costs/Costs Principles Federal Awards 84.245 – Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Career and Technical Institutions Condition The College should charge costs to the grant which are allowable. Also, documentation should be kept that supports that disbursements are being made in the correct amounts based on invoices to ensure only approved amounts are charged to the grant. Criteria: Of the 15 non-payroll transactions tested, we noted one instance where the disbursement was misallocated to the grant. Cause: The College did not properly execute its policies and procedures for reviewing non-payroll disbursements. Effect: Grant awards potentially overcharged. Questioned Costs: $127 Recommendation: We recommend the College follow and properly execute its procedures it has in place relating to non-payroll expenditures. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions Staff has been hired and trained. Journal entries will be reviewed prior to posting.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: We recommend the College follow and properly execute its procedures it has in place relating to non-payroll expenditures. Action Taken: The Finance department will review and ensure all journal entries are properly documented prior to making posting payments. Finance is 90% fully staffed and new staff have been trained on how to do journal entries.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-06-30

$26,732,416 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 27, 2024 — management decision was due December 27, 2024.

2023-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-002

Federal Awards 15.042 – Indian School Equalization 15.060 – Indian Vocational Training United Tribes Technical College 47.070 – Computer and Information Science and Engineering 47.076 – Education and Human Resources (R&D) 84.245A – Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Career and Technical Institutions 84.299A – Indian Education – Special Programs for Indian Children 84.425F – HEERF Institutional Support 84.425K – HEERF Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs) Condition The College operated its indirect cost plan during the year without an approved indirect cost rate. The final approved IDC rate was received on January 12, 2024. Criteria: The Office of Management & Budget’s Uniform Guidance requires that the College receive approval of its indirect cost recovery rate whenever federal and state funded programs are to be charged to the plan. Current year plans are required to be submitted no later than six months following the close of the prior fiscal year. These plans are sent to the U.S. Department of Interior – Interior Business Center (IBC) for approval and determination of an allowable cost recovery rate. Cause: The College has not submitted (in a timely manner) an indirect cost rate proposal / plan to the IBC for review and approval. Effect: The College was using a provisional IDC rate during the year to charge indirect costs. Recommendation: Submission of the College’s indirect cost plan in a timely manner to IBC for plan and rate approval. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The FY23 and FY24 Indirect Costs Proposals were submitted and approved in January 2024. The College adjusted the IDC collections for FY23 and is currently using the FY24 IDC approved rate. The College continues to use an outside entity to work with UTTC Finance staff to complete future IDC Proposals in a timely manner. We expect the FY 25 and FY26 IDC Proposal to be submitted by December 31, 2024. The CFO is responsible to ensure this is completed.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Awards 15.042 – Indian School Equalization 15.060 – Indian Vocational Training United Tribes Technical College 47.070 – Computer and Information Science and Engineering 47.076 – Education and Human Resources (R&D) 84.245A – Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Career and Technical Institutions 84.299A – Indian Education – Special Programs for Indian Children 84.425F – HEERF Institutional Support 84.425K – HEERF Tribally Controlled Colleges and Universities (TCCUs) Condition The College operated its indirect cost plan during the year without an approved indirect cost rate. The final approved IDC rate was received on January 12, 2024. Criteria: The Office of Management & Budget’s Uniform Guidance requires that the College receive approval of its indirect cost recovery rate whenever federal and state funded programs are to be charged to the plan. Current year plans are required to be submitted no later than six months following the close of the prior fiscal year. These plans are sent to the U.S. Department of Interior – Interior Business Center (IBC) for approval and determination of an allowable cost recovery rate. Cause: The College has not submitted (in a timely manner) an indirect cost rate proposal / plan to the IBC for review and approval. Effect: The College was using a provisional IDC rate during the year to charge indirect costs. Recommendation: Submission of the College’s indirect cost plan in a timely manner to IBC for plan and rate approval. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The FY23 and FY24 Indirect Costs Proposals were submitted and approved in January 2024. The College adjusted the IDC collections for FY23 and is currently using the FY24 IDC approved rate. The College continues to use an outside entity to work with UTTC Finance staff to complete future IDC Proposals in a timely manner. We expect the FY 25 and FY26 IDC Proposal to be submitted by December 31, 2024. The CFO is responsible to ensure this is completed.

Corrective Action Plan

The FY23 and FY24 Indirect Costs Proposals were submitted and approved in January 2024. The College adjusted the IDC collections for FY23 and is currently using the FY24 IDC approved rate. The College continues to use an outside entity to work with UTTC Finance staff to complete future IDC Proposals in a timely manner. We expect the FY 25 and FY26 IDC Proposal to be submitted by December 31, 2024. The CFO is responsible to ensure this is completed.

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$33,795,916 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2023 — management decision was due September 30, 2023.

2022-002
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINION
Show full finding ▾
2022-003
Equipment & Real Property
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION
Show full finding ▾

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$27,704,263 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2022 — management decision was due March 20, 2023.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,819,030 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 27, 2021 — management decision was due October 27, 2021.

2020-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY
Show full finding ▾
2020-002
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾

FY 2019-06-30

GOING CONCERNLOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,577,440 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2020 — management decision was due September 16, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾
2019-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY
Show full finding ▾
2019-003
Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2018-001OTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾

FY 2018-06-30

$19,930,523 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2019 — management decision was due September 24, 2019.

2018-001
Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS
Show full finding ▾

FY 2017-06-30

$19,542,016 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2018 — management decision was due September 29, 2018.

2015-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-001
Show full finding ▾
Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Other →

FY 2016-06-30

$21,511,794 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2017 — management decision was due September 26, 2017.

2015-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-001
Show full finding ▾
Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Other →
2016-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY
Show full finding ▾
2016-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MODIFIED OPINIONSIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY
Show full finding ▾
2016-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MODIFIED OPINION
Show full finding ▾

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in North Dakota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.