EIN: 446005747
UEI: LQAVQT2J5A59
Audited by: Forvis Mazars, LLP
Oversight agency: 97 [Department of Homeland Security]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 26, 2026 (9 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2024 — management decision was due April 24, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2024 — management decision was due September 7, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 23, 2023 — management decision was due September 23, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.
Finding: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Reporting Department of Health and Human Services Direct Program: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund - 93.498 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Cost Principles (Pub L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623). The Provider Relief Fund (PRF) was established in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act, P.L. 116-136) to reimburse, through grants or other mechanisms, eligible health care providers for increased expenses or lost revenue attributable to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Entities that received more than $10,000 (either one time or in the aggregate) are required to report the uses of their funds, including the lost revenue reimbursement and documentation of how the lost revenue was calculated. In addition, management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over costs directly and indirectly charged to federal awards. Condition ? The Hospital is required to prepare and submit period one provider relief fund reporting to the U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services. This report is to be prepared using accurate financial information and submitted by the deadline established. The Hospital incorrectly reported lost revenue for period one. Questioned Costs ? Unknown Context ? We tested the period one report submitted by the Hospital for the year ended June 30, 2021. The Hospital, having elected to use lost revenues calculation reporting Option #1, actual to actual, made modifications to 2020 and 2021 actual revenues to remove revenue related to the acquisition of a hospital-based anesthesia group in 2020 when comparing to 2019 actual revenues. The Hospital should have elected to use Option #3, which is any reasonable method of estimating revenues. The Hospital should have also submitted a narrative explaining the methodology of estimating revenues under Option #3. Effect ? The Hospital submitted lost revenues under the provider relief fund reporting that are not within the framework prescibed with selecting Option #1 - actual to actual. By selecting the incorrect option, the Hospital did not submit the required narrative information to the Health Resources and Services Administration. Cause ? The Hospital selected Option #1 - actual to actual but should have selected Option #3 - any reasonable method of estimating revenues because adjustments were made to remove clinic revenue in 2020 and 2021 when comparing to 2019 actual revenues. Internal controls were not in place to ensure the Hospital correctly applied the guidance. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding Recommendation ? The Hospital should continue to improve their understanding of the guidance related to this type of reporting and implement additonal controls over future reporting periods to help ensure guidance is followed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions ? The Hospital agrees with this finding. See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding: Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs/Cost Principles, and Reporting Department of Health and Human Services Direct Program: COVID-19 Provider Relief Fund - 93.498 Criteria or Specific Requirement ? Reporting (45 CFR 75.342) and Activities Allowed/Unallowed and Cost Principles (Pub L. No. 116-136, 134 Stat. 563 and Pub L. No. 116-139, 134 Stat. 622 and 623). The Provider Relief Fund (PRF) was established in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act, P.L. 116-136) to reimburse, through grants or other mechanisms, eligible health care providers for increased expenses or lost revenue attributable to Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Entities that received more than $10,000 (either one time or in the aggregate) are required to report the uses of their funds, including the lost revenue reimbursement and documentation of how the lost revenue was calculated. In addition, management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over costs directly and indirectly charged to federal awards. Condition ? The Hospital is required to prepare and submit period one provider relief fund reporting to the U.S. Department of Heath and Human Services. This report is to be prepared using accurate financial information and submitted by the deadline established. The Hospital incorrectly reported lost revenue for period one. Questioned Costs ? Unknown Context ? We tested the period one report submitted by the Hospital for the year ended June 30, 2021. The Hospital, having elected to use lost revenues calculation reporting Option #1, actual to actual, made modifications to 2020 and 2021 actual revenues to remove revenue related to the acquisition of a hospital-based anesthesia group in 2020 when comparing to 2019 actual revenues. The Hospital should have elected to use Option #3, which is any reasonable method of estimating revenues. The Hospital should have also submitted a narrative explaining the methodology of estimating revenues under Option #3. Effect ? The Hospital submitted lost revenues under the provider relief fund reporting that are not within the framework prescibed with selecting Option #1 - actual to actual. By selecting the incorrect option, the Hospital did not submit the required narrative information to the Health Resources and Services Administration. Cause ? The Hospital selected Option #1 - actual to actual but should have selected Option #3 - any reasonable method of estimating revenues because adjustments were made to remove clinic revenue in 2020 and 2021 when comparing to 2019 actual revenues. Internal controls were not in place to ensure the Hospital correctly applied the guidance. Identification as a Repeat Finding - Not a repeat finding Recommendation ? The Hospital should continue to improve their understanding of the guidance related to this type of reporting and implement additonal controls over future reporting periods to help ensure guidance is followed. View of Responsible Official and Planned Corrective Actions ? The Hospital agrees with this finding. See separate auditee document for planned corrective action.
During the testing of the compliance requirements of this program, it was determined that North Kansas City Hospital having elected to use lost revenues calculation reporting Option #1, actual to actual, made modifications to 2020 and 2021 actual revenues to remove revenue related to the acquisition of a hospital-based anesthesia provider group in 2020 when comparing to 2019 actual revenues. The Hospital should have elected to use Option #3, which is any reasonable method of estimating revenues. The Hospital should have also submitted a narrative explaining the methodology of estimating revenues under Option #3. Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Austin Jones, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer Anticipated Completion Date: September 30, 2022 Corrective Action Plan: The finding identified is a result of North Kansas City Hospital selecting the incorrect reporting option in what was reported to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. North Kansas City Hosptial will continue to improve its understanding of the guidance related to this type of reporting and implement additional controls over future reporting periods to help ensure guidance is followed. While North Kansas City Hospital, elected the incorrect reporting option for lost revenues, there was sufficient lost revenues in 2020 compared to 2019 related to the Provider Relief Fund.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.