← Back to home

Planned Parenthood Great PlainsNon-Profit

EIN: 440565390

UEI: HH1PRRXHYXX5

Audit also covers 2 related EINs: 480847946, 730685955 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: CLA, LLP

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Planned Parenthood Great Plains7 audit years6 findings2 repeat
7
Audit Years
6
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$2.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,233,934 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 13, 2026 (18 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,749,672 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2024 — management decision was due June 20, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,068,683 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2024 — management decision was due July 9, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,212,310 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2022 — management decision was due June 21, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$920,057 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2022 — management decision was due July 26, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$958,721 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2020 — management decision was due June 10, 2021.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-001

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed, we noted that adequate reviews of journal entries are not consistently being performed. Specifically, we noted that certain individuals have the ability to post journal entries without approval or authorization. We also noted an instance where a reviewer did not inspect source documentation for a journal entry resulting in a financial statement error requiring an adjusting entry. Cause: A system of review of manual journal entries is not in place or lacked the diligence necessary to prevent misstatements in the financial statements. Effect: Potentially material misstatements in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Repeat Finding: This was previously reported as finding 2019-001 in the Compliance Report for the year ended June 30, 2019. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all manual journal entries which includes a review of supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed, we noted that adequate reviews of journal entries are not consistently being performed. Specifically, we noted that certain individuals have the ability to post journal entries without approval or authorization. We also noted an instance where a reviewer did not inspect source documentation for a journal entry resulting in a financial statement error requiring an adjusting entry. Cause: A system of review of manual journal entries is not in place or lacked the diligence necessary to prevent misstatements in the financial statements. Effect: Potentially material misstatements in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Repeat Finding: This was previously reported as finding 2019-001 in the Compliance Report for the year ended June 30, 2019. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all manual journal entries which includes a review of supporting documentation. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Management added a Controller in March 2020 who is responsible for review of all journal entries prior to posting. Due to the pandemic, this process was not fully implemented until June 2020.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Program Income →
2020-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-004

Criteria: Per the grant agreement between Missouri Family Health Council (MFHC) and Planned Parenthood, various reports are required to be submitted to MFHC. Condition/Context: During audit work performed over reporting, it was noted Planned Parenthood did submit all required reports during the fiscal year prior to the federal deadline; however, Planned Parenthood did not have evidence of controls occurring to ensure that reports that were submitted were complete and accurate. Questioned Costs: None Cause: There is no review of reports taking place prior to submission. Effect: Planned Parenthood was not in compliance regarding controls over reporting. Repeat Finding: This was previously reported as finding 2019-004 in the Compliance Report for the year ended June 30, 2019. Recommendation: We recommend that Planned Parenthood establish a process to review reports and evidence the review to ensure that reports are completely and accurately prepared before submission to MFHC. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Per the grant agreement between Missouri Family Health Council (MFHC) and Planned Parenthood, various reports are required to be submitted to MFHC. Condition/Context: During audit work performed over reporting, it was noted Planned Parenthood did submit all required reports during the fiscal year prior to the federal deadline; however, Planned Parenthood did not have evidence of controls occurring to ensure that reports that were submitted were complete and accurate. Questioned Costs: None Cause: There is no review of reports taking place prior to submission. Effect: Planned Parenthood was not in compliance regarding controls over reporting. Repeat Finding: This was previously reported as finding 2019-004 in the Compliance Report for the year ended June 30, 2019. Recommendation: We recommend that Planned Parenthood establish a process to review reports and evidence the review to ensure that reports are completely and accurately prepared before submission to MFHC. Views of Responsible Officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Management established a process to review reports prior to submission but it took some time for the process to be consistently applied.

Prior Finding References

2019-004

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Program Income →

FY 2019-06-30

$1,523,511 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 28, 2020 — management decision was due July 28, 2020.

2019-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed around journal entry testing, it was noted that personnel have the ability to prepare and post journal entries without approval or authorization. Cause: A system of review of manual journal entries is not in place. Effect: Potentially material misstatements in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all manual journal entries. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed around journal entry testing, it was noted that personnel have the ability to prepare and post journal entries without approval or authorization. Cause: A system of review of manual journal entries is not in place. Effect: Potentially material misstatements in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all manual journal entries. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

During the audit work performed around journal entry testing, it was noted that personnel have the ability to prepare and post journal entries without approval or authorization.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Program Income →
2019-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed around the completeness of the balance in accounts payable, two invoices were identified that were not properly accrued for at year-end. Cause: Controls around accounts payable not operating effectively. Effect: Potentially material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all invoices received subsequent to year-end. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed around the completeness of the balance in accounts payable, two invoices were identified that were not properly accrued for at year-end. Cause: Controls around accounts payable not operating effectively. Effect: Potentially material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all invoices received subsequent to year-end. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

During the audit work performed around the completeness pf the balance in accounts payable, two invoices were identified that were not properly accrued for at year-end.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Program Income →
2019-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed over the consolidated statement of financial position, it was noted that several accounts had not been timely or properly reconciled. Cause: Controls around balance sheet account balances not operating effectively. Effect: Potentially material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all statement of financial position accounts at year-end. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting. Condition/context: During the audit work performed over the consolidated statement of financial position, it was noted that several accounts had not been timely or properly reconciled. Cause: Controls around balance sheet account balances not operating effectively. Effect: Potentially material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements due to error or fraud could occur and not be prevented or detected in a timely manner. Recommendation: Management implement a process of review for all statement of financial position accounts at year-end. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

During the audit work performed over statement of financial position, it was noted that several accounts had not been timely of properly reconciled.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Program Income →
2019-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Program Income
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the Missouri Family Health Council Title X Family Planning (CFDA No. 93.217) Federal Award Year: 2018?2019 Type of Compliance Finding: L ? Reporting Criteria: Per the grant agreement between Missouri Family Health Council (MFHC) and the Organization, various reports are required to be submitted to MFHC. Condition/Context: During audit work performed over reporting, it was noted the Organization did not have proper controls in place to ensure that reports that were submitted were complete and accurate. Questioned costs: None Cause: There is no review of reports taking place prior to submission. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance regarding controls over reporting. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization establish a process to review reports to ensure that reports are completely and accurately prepared before submission to MFHC. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Passed through the Missouri Family Health Council Title X Family Planning (CFDA No. 93.217) Federal Award Year: 2018?2019 Type of Compliance Finding: L ? Reporting Criteria: Per the grant agreement between Missouri Family Health Council (MFHC) and the Organization, various reports are required to be submitted to MFHC. Condition/Context: During audit work performed over reporting, it was noted the Organization did not have proper controls in place to ensure that reports that were submitted were complete and accurate. Questioned costs: None Cause: There is no review of reports taking place prior to submission. Effect: The Organization was not in compliance regarding controls over reporting. Repeat finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization establish a process to review reports to ensure that reports are completely and accurately prepared before submission to MFHC. Views of responsible officials: Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

During audit work performed over reporting, it was noted the Organization did not have proper controls in place to ensure that reports that were submitted were complete and accurate.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Program Income →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.