EIN: 440545998
UEI: XMMNDZMLJ7D6
Audited by: KELLER & OWENS, LLC
Oversight agency: 64 [Department of Veterans Affairs]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 29, 2026 (115 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on July 17, 2026 — management decision was due January 17, 2027.
FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2025 — management decision was due July 27, 2025.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.318, general procurement standards, the entity must establish policies for procurement of services funded by federal funds. The procurement records and files for purchases in excess of the micro purchase threshold shall include at a minimum the following items: the basis for contractor selection, justification for lack of competition when competitive bids are not obtained, and basis for award cost or price. In addition, award recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. To ensure this is done, recipients should utilize the Excluded Parties List System website. Condition/Context: For our sample of one (representing the entire population), there was no documentation of policies and procedures for procurement of services funded by federal funds of $40,000. We determined for this program that rate quotations and rationale for limited competition was not retained for the vendor. It was also determined that there was no documentation retained regarding verification of vendor suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The entity has written policies including detailed levels of approvals for various vendors and purchases. However, the entity does not have policies and procedures designed for procurements under the Uniform Guidance, and therefore, there is not a formal process established to document the performance of such controls. We note that inadequate controls could result in a reasonable possibility that the entity would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Effect: Costs charged to federal awards without appropriate documentation of procurement policies and processes may be subject to disallowance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend developing written procurement policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and implementing a system of review and approval controls to complement the design of processes over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements. In addition, we recommend retaining documentation regarding procurement decisions including rate quotations and verification of vendor suspension and debarment checks. Views of Responsible Officials: The Entity agrees with the recommendation. The Entity will develop a formal procurement plan for federal expenditures which will include the specific processes for selecting vendors including documentation retention of the selection process. The policy will also include the process to be followed for verification of vendor suspension or debarment. At the time of the policy’s adoption by the Division, the document will be shared with all corps officers and program administrators throughout the Division. The Divisional Contract Compliance Manager will be responsible for identifying grants to which the policy would apply and to assist with retaining the documentation.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.318, general procurement standards, the entity must establish policies for procurement of services funded by federal funds. The procurement records and files for purchases in excess of the micro purchase threshold shall include at a minimum the following items: the basis for contractor selection, justification for lack of competition when competitive bids are not obtained, and basis for award cost or price. In addition, award recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. To ensure this is done, recipients should utilize the Excluded Parties List System website. Condition/Context: For our sample of one (representing the entire population), there was no documentation of policies and procedures for procurement of services funded by federal funds of $40,000. We determined for this program that rate quotations and rationale for limited competition was not retained for the vendor. It was also determined that there was no documentation retained regarding verification of vendor suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The entity has written policies including detailed levels of approvals for various vendors and purchases. However, the entity does not have policies and procedures designed for procurements under the Uniform Guidance, and therefore, there is not a formal process established to document the performance of such controls. We note that inadequate controls could result in a reasonable possibility that the entity would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Effect: Costs charged to federal awards without appropriate documentation of procurement policies and processes may be subject to disallowance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend developing written procurement policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and implementing a system of review and approval controls to complement the design of processes over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements. In addition, we recommend retaining documentation regarding procurement decisions including rate quotations and verification of vendor suspension and debarment checks. Views of Responsible Officials: The Entity agrees with the recommendation. The Entity will develop a formal procurement plan for federal expenditures which will include the specific processes for selecting vendors including documentation retention of the selection process. The policy will also include the process to be followed for verification of vendor suspension or debarment. At the time of the policy’s adoption by the Division, the document will be shared with all corps officers and program administrators throughout the Division. The Divisional Contract Compliance Manager will be responsible for identifying grants to which the policy would apply and to assist with retaining the documentation.
We will develop a formal procurement plan for federal expenditures which will include the specific processes for selecting vendors including documentation retention of the selection process. The policy will also include the process to be followed for verification of vendor suspension or debarment. At the time of the policy’s adoption by the Division, the document will be shared with all corps officers and program administrators throughout the Division. The Divisional Contract Compliance Manager will be responsible for identifying grants to which the policy would apply and to assist with retaining the documentation.
FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2025 — management decision was due September 12, 2025.
Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.318, general procurement standards, the entity must establish policies for procurement of services funded by federal funds. The procurement records and files for purchases in excess of the micro purchase threshold shall include at a minimum the following items: the basis for contractor selection, justification for lack of competition when competitive bids are not obtained, and basis for award cost or price. In addition, award recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. To ensure this is done, recipients should utilize the Excluded Parties List System website. Condition/Context: For our sample of one (representing the entire population), there was no documentation of policies and procedures for procurement of services funded by federal funds of $40,000. We determined for this program that rate quotations and rationale for limited competition was not retained for the vendor. It was also determined that there was no documentation retained regarding verification of vendor suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The entity has written policies including detailed levels of approvals for various vendors and purchases. However, the entity does not have policies and procedures designed for procurements under the Uniform Guidance, and therefore, there is not a formal process established to document the performance of such controls. We note that inadequate controls could result in a reasonable possibility that the entity would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Effect: Costs charged to federal awards without appropriate documentation of procurement policies and processes may be subject to disallowance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend developing written procurement policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and implementing a system of review and approval controls to complement the design of processes over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements. In addition, we recommend retaining documentation regarding procurement decisions including rate quotations and verification of vendor suspension and debarment checks. Views of Responsible Officials: The Entity agrees with the recommendation. The Entity will develop a formal procurement plan for federal expenditures which will include the specific processes for selecting vendors including documentation retention of the selection process. The policy will also include the process to be followed for verification of vendor suspension or debarment. At the time of the policy’s adoption by the Division, the document will be shared with all corps officers and program administrators throughout the Division. The Divisional Contract Compliance Manager will be responsible for identifying grants to which the policy would apply and to assist with retaining the documentation.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Per 2 CFR §200.318, general procurement standards, the entity must establish policies for procurement of services funded by federal funds. The procurement records and files for purchases in excess of the micro purchase threshold shall include at a minimum the following items: the basis for contractor selection, justification for lack of competition when competitive bids are not obtained, and basis for award cost or price. In addition, award recipients must not utilize any vendor which is suspended or debarred or is otherwise excluded from the central contractor registry. To ensure this is done, recipients should utilize the Excluded Parties List System website. Condition/Context: For our sample of one (representing the entire population), there was no documentation of policies and procedures for procurement of services funded by federal funds of $40,000. We determined for this program that rate quotations and rationale for limited competition was not retained for the vendor. It was also determined that there was no documentation retained regarding verification of vendor suspension or debarment. Questioned Costs: None noted. Cause: The entity has written policies including detailed levels of approvals for various vendors and purchases. However, the entity does not have policies and procedures designed for procurements under the Uniform Guidance, and therefore, there is not a formal process established to document the performance of such controls. We note that inadequate controls could result in a reasonable possibility that the entity would not be able to detect and correct noncompliance in a timely manner. Effect: Costs charged to federal awards without appropriate documentation of procurement policies and processes may be subject to disallowance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend developing written procurement policies in accordance with the Uniform Guidance and implementing a system of review and approval controls to complement the design of processes over the procurement, suspension, and debarment compliance requirements. In addition, we recommend retaining documentation regarding procurement decisions including rate quotations and verification of vendor suspension and debarment checks. Views of Responsible Officials: The Entity agrees with the recommendation. The Entity will develop a formal procurement plan for federal expenditures which will include the specific processes for selecting vendors including documentation retention of the selection process. The policy will also include the process to be followed for verification of vendor suspension or debarment. At the time of the policy’s adoption by the Division, the document will be shared with all corps officers and program administrators throughout the Division. The Divisional Contract Compliance Manager will be responsible for identifying grants to which the policy would apply and to assist with retaining the documentation.
We will develop a formal procurement plan for federal expenditures which will include the specific processes for selecting vendors including documentation retention of the selection process. The policy will also include the process to be followed for verification of vendor suspension or debarment. At the time of the policy’s adoption by the Division, the document will be shared with all corps officers and program administrators throughout the Division. The Divisional Contract Compliance Manager will be responsible for identifying grants to which the policy would apply and to assist with retaining the documentation.
FAC accepted this audit on February 21, 2024 — management decision was due August 21, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2024 — management decision was due October 2, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on February 1, 2023 — management decision was due August 1, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on February 12, 2023 — management decision was due August 12, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on January 26, 2022 — management decision was due July 26, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2022 — management decision was due August 7, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2020 — management decision was due June 28, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on February 3, 2021 — management decision was due August 3, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2020 — management decision was due July 8, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2020 — management decision was due July 13, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2019 — management decision was due July 8, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2019 — management decision was due July 3, 2019.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2017-001
FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2018 — management decision was due August 20, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2017 — management decision was due June 20, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
FAC accepted this audit on February 2, 2017 — management decision was due August 2, 2017.
FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2017 — management decision was due July 5, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
