HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIALocal Government

EIN: 436014416

UEI: HM6YGEFXCGW7

Audit also covers 17 related EINs — show all

300835383, 300950620, 320444405, 320447420, 352513230, 352778452, 364791132, 371783610, 463751945, 471362131, 471362215, 471591548, 474784720, 611741273, 770601167, 813740743, 851658204 · unlinked EINs have no separate FAC filing

Audited by: RUBINBROWN LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF COLUMBIA9 audit years9 findings2 repeat
9
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$15.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$15,705,536 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on August 29, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 1, 2026 (181 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,444,450 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 9, 2024 — management decision was due February 9, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,748,557 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2023 — management decision was due February 28, 2024.

2022-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The Authority did not submit the required form within the designated timeframe, nor did the existing control operate as intended to prevent the error from occurring. Cause: The control in place did not ensure timely submission of the HUD-50058. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected regarding compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: One of the 40 participants selected for testing did not have the HUD-50058 submitted within the required 60 day timeframe. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that management evaluate their existing control over the timely submission of the HUD-50058 upon a participant?s exit of the program, and consider implementing additional controls such as a review of a schedule of participants who exited the program monthly, to ensure the all required submissions to HUD take place on time. Views Of Responsible Officials: Management has developed a tracking chart to track submission of the HUD-50058 for participants exiting the program that will be monitored monthly.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001 Significant Deficiency: Special Reporting - Compliance and Control Finding ALN 14.871 and 14.879 - Housing Voucher Cluster: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Pass-Through Entity: N/A - Direct Award Criteria Or Specific Requirement: HUD requires Public Housing Authorities (PHA) to submit a Form HUD-50058 each time a family ends participation in the program or movesout of the PHA?s jurisdiction under portability within 60 days of the participants termination or exit of the program. Condition: The Authority did not submit the required form within the designated timeframe, nor did the existing control operate as intended to prevent the error from occurring. Cause: The control in place did not ensure timely submission of the HUD-50058. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected regarding compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: One of the 40 participants selected for testing did not have the HUD-50058 submitted within the required 60 day timeframe. Identification As A Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that management evaluate their existing control over the timely submission of the HUD-50058 upon a participant?s exit of the program, and consider implementing additional controls such as a review of a schedule of participants who exited the program monthly, to ensure the all required submissions to HUD take place on time. Views Of Responsible Officials: Management has developed a tracking chart to track submission of the HUD-50058 for participants exiting the program that will be monitored monthly.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2022-001 Significant Deficiency: Special Reporting - Compliance and Control Finding Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Staff Tawanda Edwards, Director of Housing Programs Laura Lewis, Director of Affordable Housing Anticipated Completion Date: 8/10/2023 Corrective Action Plan: CHA has developed a tracking chart to track submission of the HUD-50058 for participants exiting the program that will be monitored monthly. The Director of Housing Programs has delegated submission of the HUD-50058 for participants exiting the program that also have ported to another PHA, to the CHA Housing Programs Manager and will monitor the completion of this delegated task monthly.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,852,198 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 10, 2022 — management decision was due February 10, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,683,675 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 19, 2021 — management decision was due March 19, 2022.

2020-001
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

A second review to verify accuracy of participant file documentation, including rent reasonableness, did not take place. Cause: Controls over compliance are not in place to ensure unit rental comparability forms are prepared accurately. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: No auditable evidence exists to support the review of participant files which include rental unit comparison forms. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that management put a control in place for a second review of participant files to ensure all requirements for participating in the program are completed and retained. The review should be properly documented with the reviewer?s signature and the date the review was performed. The second review should be performed by someone other than the preparer and who has knowledge of the grant?s eligibility and rent reasonableness requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Manager will pull files on a sample basis and conduct a second review of the file. The HCV Manager will keep a tracking chart of all files audited along with the completed file audit checklists for later review.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-001 Material Weakness: Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding CFDA 14.276 - Continuum of Care Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Pass-Through Entity: N/A - Direct Award Criteria Or Specific Requirement: HUD requires rents funded by federal grants be reasonable in relation to rents being charged in the area for comparable space. In addition, the rent may not exceed rents currently being charged by the same owner for comparable unassisted space (24 CFR section 578.5(b)(1)). Additionally, Uniform Guidance 2 CFR section 200.303 requires that controls over compliance be properly designed, in place and operating effectively to ensure compliance with the requirements of the federal program. Condition: A second review to verify accuracy of participant file documentation, including rent reasonableness, did not take place. Cause: Controls over compliance are not in place to ensure unit rental comparability forms are prepared accurately. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: No auditable evidence exists to support the review of participant files which include rental unit comparison forms. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend that management put a control in place for a second review of participant files to ensure all requirements for participating in the program are completed and retained. The review should be properly documented with the reviewer?s signature and the date the review was performed. The second review should be performed by someone other than the preparer and who has knowledge of the grant?s eligibility and rent reasonableness requirements. Views of Responsible Officials: The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Manager will pull files on a sample basis and conduct a second review of the file. The HCV Manager will keep a tracking chart of all files audited along with the completed file audit checklists for later review.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2020-001 Material Weakness: Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Staff Rick Hess, Director of Housing Operations Laura Lewis, Director of Affordable Housing Anticipated Completion Date: 9/10/2021 Corrective Action Plan: The Housing Choice Voucher Manager will pull files on a sample basis and conduct a second review of the file. The HCV Manager will meet with the Specialist to discuss results of the file review. Once the specialist has corrected the findings, the HCV Manager and the Specialist will sign off confirming completion. The HCV Manager will keep a tracking chart of all files audited along with the completed file audit checklists for later review.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-002
Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-001

Income was not correctly calculated based on the support provided in the participant file. Cause: The Authority has internal controls in place related to participant file review whereby files are second reviewed on a sample basis due to the number of participants in the program. The participant files related to the two instances described below were not randomly selected for participant file review. Effect: While participants were found to be eligible for participation in both instances, a situation could arise there a participant is ineligible if all supporting documentation is not accurate or retained. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For two of sixty participant files, income was incorrectly calculated based on support in participant file. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: This was finding 2019-001. Recommendation: The Authority should modify its internal control processes and increase the amount of second reviews performed to ensure participant files are complete, compliant and that assistance calculations are accurate and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Manager will pull files on a sample basis and conduct a second review of the file. The HCV Manager will keep a tracking chart of all files audited along with the completed file audit checklists for later review.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-002 Significant Deficiency: Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding CFDA 14.871 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A - Direct Award Criteria Or Specific Requirements: 1. The PHA must determine that a participant is eligible through an income verification (24 CFR section 982.516) and calculation in accordance with 24 CFR part 5 subpart F. 2. The PHA must Reexamine family income and composition at least once every 12 months and adjust the participant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third-party verification (24 CFR section 982.516). Condition: Income was not correctly calculated based on the support provided in the participant file. Cause: The Authority has internal controls in place related to participant file review whereby files are second reviewed on a sample basis due to the number of participants in the program. The participant files related to the two instances described below were not randomly selected for participant file review. Effect: While participants were found to be eligible for participation in both instances, a situation could arise there a participant is ineligible if all supporting documentation is not accurate or retained. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For two of sixty participant files, income was incorrectly calculated based on support in participant file. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: This was finding 2019-001. Recommendation: The Authority should modify its internal control processes and increase the amount of second reviews performed to ensure participant files are complete, compliant and that assistance calculations are accurate and supported. Views of Responsible Officials: The Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Manager will pull files on a sample basis and conduct a second review of the file. The HCV Manager will keep a tracking chart of all files audited along with the completed file audit checklists for later review.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2020-002 Significant Deficiency: Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Staff Rick Hess, Director of Housing Operations Laura Lewis, Director of Affordable Housing Anticipated Completion Date: 9/10/2021 Corrective Action Plan: The Housing Choice Voucher Manager will pull files on a sample basis and conduct a second review of the file. The HCV Manager will meet with the specialist to discuss results of the file review. Once the specialist bas corrected the findings, the HCV Manager and the Specialist will sign off confirming completion. The HCV Manager will keep a tracking chart of all files audited along with the completed file audit checklists for later review. The HCV Manger will increase the amount of second file reviews performed to ensure participant files are complete and accurate.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2020-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

In October 2020, the Authority implemented a new internal control process over monthly waitlists to ensure the lists were accurate and individuals were appropriately removed from the waitlist when housed or found to be ineligible. Cause: The Authority did not implement the internal control process until October 2020. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For four of seven monthly waitlists selected for testing, a second review was not documented during calendar year 2020. All exceptions occurred in months prior to October 2020. Identification as a repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Authority has implemented an internal control related to monthly waitlist review. Second reviews should be timely and documented to ensure compliance with the requirements of federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: Corrective Action plan already in place. This is no longer an issue.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2020-003 Significant Deficiency: Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding CFDA 14.871 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A - Direct Award Criteria Or Specific Requirements: HUD requires that all families admitted to the program be selected from a waitlist (exception for special admission scenarios stated in 24 CFR section 982.203). The selection occurs when the Authority notifies a family whose name reaches the top of the waiting list to come in for eligibility verification (24 CFR sections 5.410, 982.54(d), and 982.201 through 982.207). Condition: In October 2020, the Authority implemented a new internal control process over monthly waitlists to ensure the lists were accurate and individuals were appropriately removed from the waitlist when housed or found to be ineligible. Cause: The Authority did not implement the internal control process until October 2020. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For four of seven monthly waitlists selected for testing, a second review was not documented during calendar year 2020. All exceptions occurred in months prior to October 2020. Identification as a repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Authority has implemented an internal control related to monthly waitlist review. Second reviews should be timely and documented to ensure compliance with the requirements of federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: Corrective Action plan already in place. This is no longer an issue.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2020-003 Significant Deficiency: Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Staff Rick Hess, Director of Housing Operations Laura Lewis, Director of Affordable Housing Anticipated Completion Date: 9/15/2020 Corrective Action Plan: Corrective Action plan already in place. This is no longer an issue.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,610,416 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2020 — management decision was due March 28, 2021.

2019-001
Eligibility / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Income was not correctly calculated based on the support provided in the file and annual recertification was not performed timely. Cause: The Authority has internal controls in place related to tenant file review whereby files are second reviewed on a sample basis due to the number of participants in the program. The participant files related to the two instances described below were not randomly selected for tenant file review. Effect: While tenants were found to be eligible for participation in both instances, a situation could arise there a tenant is ineligible if all supporting documentation is not accurate or retained. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 2 of 60 participant files, income was incorrectly calculated based on support in tenant file. For 1 of 60 participant files, a recertification was not performed during calendar year 2019. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Authority should modify its internal control processes and increase the amount of second reviews performed to ensure participant files are complete, compliant and that assistance calculations are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program Manager will track each month the status of annual recertifications to ensure recertifications are timely. In addition, the file review checklist will be modified to include an additional page for additional final review and income calculation. Documentation of these reviews will be maintained with the program tenants file.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2019-001 Significant Deficiency: Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Compliance and Control Finding CFDA 14.871 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A - Direct Award Criteria Or Specific Requirements: 1. The PHA must determine that a participant is eligible through an income verification (24 CFR section 982.516) and calculation in accordance with 24 CFR part 5 subpart F. 2. The PHA must Reexamine family income and composition at least once every 12 months and adjust the tenant rent and housing assistance payment as necessary using the documentation from third-party verification (24 CFR section 982.516). Condition: Income was not correctly calculated based on the support provided in the file and annual recertification was not performed timely. Cause: The Authority has internal controls in place related to tenant file review whereby files are second reviewed on a sample basis due to the number of participants in the program. The participant files related to the two instances described below were not randomly selected for tenant file review. Effect: While tenants were found to be eligible for participation in both instances, a situation could arise there a tenant is ineligible if all supporting documentation is not accurate or retained. Questioned Costs: None. Context: For 2 of 60 participant files, income was incorrectly calculated based on support in tenant file. For 1 of 60 participant files, a recertification was not performed during calendar year 2019. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: The Authority should modify its internal control processes and increase the amount of second reviews performed to ensure participant files are complete, compliant and that assistance calculations are accurate. Views of Responsible Officials: The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program Manager will track each month the status of annual recertifications to ensure recertifications are timely. In addition, the file review checklist will be modified to include an additional page for additional final review and income calculation. Documentation of these reviews will be maintained with the program tenants file.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2019-001 Significant Deficiency: Eligibility and Special Tests and Provisions - Compliance and Control Finding Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program staff Andrea Tapia, Chief Operations Officer Laura Lewis, Affordable Housing Director Anticipated Completion Date: September 15, 2020 Corrective Action Plan: The Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program Manager will track each month the status of annual recertifications. The HCV Manager will keep a tracking chart of recerts that are 30 days from completion. The HCV Manager will meet with program staff to discuss the status of the recert; both the Manager and Specialist will sign the tracking chart to show the status of the recert has been discussed and completion of the recert will need to be completed timely. The HCV Manager will follow up on the completion of the recertification and note completion on the chart. Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program staff complete, retain and submit a File Review Checklist for Initial, Annual and Interim file data processing for review. The file review checklist will be modified to include an additional page for additional final review and income calculation. The modified page will require signature by the processing specialist. The form will be scanned into the tenant's file along with the completed checklist. A copy of the modified form will be given to the Housing Choice Voucher Manager for additional review and signature. The Housing Manager will randomly pull from the list of modified forms and conduct an additional file review. The Chief Operations Officer for HCV vouchers and the Affordable Housing Director for the PBV vouchers shall monitor the file review checklists. A second random review of the program tenant files will be completed by Chief Operations Officer an internal control processes to ensure program compliance and accuracy of program assistance calculations. Documentation of these reviews will be maintained with the program tenants file.

About Eligibility, Special Tests and Provisions →
2019-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-002

Prior to July 2019, the Authority did not perform a review of information submitted monthly using the VMS system to ensure information was accurate and submitted timely. Cause: The Authority did not have an internal control process in place related to monthly VMS reporting prior to July 2019. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: A second review was not documented for 2 of 3 monthly reports selected for testing during calendar year 2019; however, reports tested were found to be in compliance and submitted timely. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: This was finding 2018-002. Recommendation: The Authority should implement an internal control related to monthly reporting. Second reviews should be timely and documented to ensure compliance with the requirements of federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: Starting in August 2019, for monthly submissions, the Director of Finance will prepare the submissions and the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Operations Officer will review the reports submitted for completeness and timely submission.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2019-002 Control Deficiency: Allowable Costs, Reporting and Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding CFDA 14.871 - Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers Program Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pass-Through Entity: N/A - Direct Award Criteria Or Specific Requirement: HUD requires the Authority to electronically submit HUD-52681-B, Voucher for Payment of Annual Contributions and Operating Statement (OMB No. 2577-0169) on a monthly basis using the VMS system. Condition: Prior to July 2019, the Authority did not perform a review of information submitted monthly using the VMS system to ensure information was accurate and submitted timely. Cause: The Authority did not have an internal control process in place related to monthly VMS reporting prior to July 2019. Effect: The possibility exists that noncompliance with federal requirements could go undetected without proper controls over compliance relating to direct and material compliance requirements. Questioned Costs: Not Applicable Context: A second review was not documented for 2 of 3 monthly reports selected for testing during calendar year 2019; however, reports tested were found to be in compliance and submitted timely. Statistical sampling was not used to test this compliance requirement. Identification as a repeat finding: This was finding 2018-002. Recommendation: The Authority should implement an internal control related to monthly reporting. Second reviews should be timely and documented to ensure compliance with the requirements of federal grants. Views of Responsible Officials: Starting in August 2019, for monthly submissions, the Director of Finance will prepare the submissions and the Chief Executive Officer or Chief Operations Officer will review the reports submitted for completeness and timely submission.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No. 2019-002 Control Deficiency: Allowable Costs, Reporting and Special Tests and Provisions - Control Finding Personnel Responsible for Corrective Action: Mary Harvey, Director of Finance Phil Steinhaus, Chief Executive Officer Andrea Tapia, Chief Operations Officer Anticipated Completion Date: August 16, 2019 Corrective Action Plan: For monthly submissions, the Director of Finance shall email the CEO and the COO a copy of the monthly VMS submission and a screen shot of the status of the submission from REAC to document the date of submission. The CEO & COO shall send an acknowledgment their review of the reports submitted and acknowledgement of HUD?s Notification of Approval. For HUD notices of Non-submission or Disapproval. The Director of Finance shall send documentation of resubmissions along with communications with the Authority?s Financial Analyst at HUD?s Financial Management Center. The CEO & COO shall send an acknowledgment their review of the reports submitted and acknowledgement of HUD?s Notification of Approval.

Prior Finding References

2018-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,403,387 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 9, 2019 — management decision was due March 9, 2020.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2018-003
Eligibility
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,158,142 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 17, 2018 — management decision was due January 17, 2019.

FY 2016-09-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,712,345 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 2, 2017 — management decision was due October 2, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.