← Back to home

Woodland R-IV School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 436014315

UEI: LLXNVD5UUKU9

Audited by: Beussink, Hey, Roe & Stroder, L.L.C.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Woodland R-IV School District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,529,104 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 16, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 16, 2026 (53 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$3,196,979 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 26, 2024 — management decision was due May 26, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$3,680,108 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2024 — management decision was due July 31, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,359,763 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2023 — management decision was due July 3, 2023.

2022-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The district purchased goods from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendor was, in fact, not an excluded party, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor?s status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $162,161 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor?s status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services passed through Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services: Epidemiology and Laboratory Capacity for Infectious Diseases (93.323). Criteria: When a sub-recipient of federal awards uses federal money to acquire goods and services expected to cost more than $25,000, the sub-recipient must determine if the vendor is suspended, debarred, or otherwise excluded from doing business with the federal government. Condition: The district purchased goods from one vendor totaling greater than $25,000 that required the District to determine the vendor?s status with the federal government. The vendor was, in fact, not an excluded party, and the District made the determination before the disbursement was made. However, the District did not keep supporting documentation to prove that the determination was made. Cause: The District was unaware that they needed to keep documentation of checking the vendor?s status on System for Award Management (SAM). Effect: The District did comply with the federal compliance requirements. However, internal controls were such that noncompliance could occur and go undetected. Questioned Costs: None. Context: Actual expenditures of the program were $162,161 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor?s status. Views of Responsible Officials: The District will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep all supporting documentation.

Corrective Action Plan

Name of Contact Person: Dr. Adrian Eftink, Superintendent Recommendation: We recommend the District verify a vendor?s status by checking the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and to keep all supporting documentation of the verification of the vendor?s status. Corrective Action: We will verify all vendors? status using the System for Award Management (SAM) maintained by the General Services Administration before making purchases expected to exceed $25,000 and keep the supporting documentation. Proposed Completion Date: Immediately

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$2,870,214 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 20, 2021 — management decision was due April 20, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,271,326 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 20, 2020 — management decision was due March 20, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,162,479 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,087,879 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2018 — management decision was due June 26, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,078,054 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2017 — management decision was due March 12, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,036,339 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2017 — management decision was due July 10, 2017.

2016-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.