← Back to home

LACOMO, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 431602725

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: RALPH C. JOHNSON & COMPANY

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

LACOMO, INC.6 audit years7 findings2 repeat
6
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$848.6K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2021)

FY 2021-12-31

$848,648 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 29, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 29, 2023 (1041 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2021-001
Cash Management
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The $690 of surplus cash at December 31, 2021 was not deposited into the residual receipts account within ninety days. Criteria: According to HUD?s guidelines, a Project must deposit surplus cash due to residual receipts within ninety days after the fiscal period ends (REAC submission due date) Cause Project management did not transfer the surplus cash of $690 from operating account to the residual receipts account. Effect: The Project held excess cash and did not make the required residual receipts deposits. This account is not in compliance with HUD requirements Recommendation: The Project should make the required deposits within the timeframe. Procedures should be improved to ensure that surplus cash is calculated at year end and transferred to the residual receipts accounts, if required. Management Response: Management will make the required deposit.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-001- Residual Receipts Deposits Federal Agency U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Program: Section 811 Capital Advance Assistance Listing Numbers 14.181 ($760,176) Federal Award Year January 1 to December 31, 2021 Questioned Costs None Condition: The $690 of surplus cash at December 31, 2021 was not deposited into the residual receipts account within ninety days. Criteria: According to HUD?s guidelines, a Project must deposit surplus cash due to residual receipts within ninety days after the fiscal period ends (REAC submission due date) Cause Project management did not transfer the surplus cash of $690 from operating account to the residual receipts account. Effect: The Project held excess cash and did not make the required residual receipts deposits. This account is not in compliance with HUD requirements Recommendation: The Project should make the required deposits within the timeframe. Procedures should be improved to ensure that surplus cash is calculated at year end and transferred to the residual receipts accounts, if required. Management Response: Management will make the required deposit.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding No 2021-001 Name of Responsible Party Fred Gibbs FKGibbs Company, LLC PO Box 410312 Kansas City, MO 64141 Fred@fkgibbs.com M: 913.709.1811 Views of Responsible Official and Corrective Action The required deposit of $690 will be made to the residual receipts accounts. Expected Date of Completion:

About Cash Management →

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$825,823 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 15, 2021 — management decision was due January 15, 2022.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The security deposit bank account is less than the tenant security deposit liability account for the year ending 12-31-2020. Questiond Costs $217 Context: The tenant security deposit bank account should contain enough funds to handle the tenant security deposit liabilities on the financial For the year ending 12-31-2020, this account was less by the amount of $217. Effect: The account is not in compliance with HUD requirements Recommendation: The Project should make the required deposits and ensure that in the future the tenant security deposit bank account is equal to or greater than the tenant security liability account per HUD requirements. Corrective Action: Management agent has made the deposit necessary to bring the deposit account in line with the security deposit liability, therefore correcting the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program: CFDA ? 14.181 Section 811 Capital Advance U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Criteria: Non-profit owners are required to maintain the security deposit funds as greater than or equal to the security deposit liability. Condition: The security deposit bank account is less than the tenant security deposit liability account for the year ending 12-31-2020. Questiond Costs $217 Context: The tenant security deposit bank account should contain enough funds to handle the tenant security deposit liabilities on the financial For the year ending 12-31-2020, this account was less by the amount of $217. Effect: The account is not in compliance with HUD requirements Recommendation: The Project should make the required deposits and ensure that in the future the tenant security deposit bank account is equal to or greater than the tenant security liability account per HUD requirements. Corrective Action: Management agent has made the deposit necessary to bring the deposit account in line with the security deposit liability, therefore correcting the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action: Management agent has made the deposit necessary to bring the deposit account in line with the security deposit liability, therefore correcting the finding.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$826,556 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2020 — management decision was due May 1, 2021.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2018-001OTHER MATTERS

The 2018 required deposit to the residual receipts account was not made in a timely manner.Questioned Costs: $0Context: The required deposit was not made in a timely manner due to an unintentional oversight and is an isolated event.Effect: The residual receipts account is not in compliance with HUD requirements.Cause: The transfer was not made from the operating bank account to the residual receipts bank account in a timely manner.Recommendation: The Project should make the required transfer and ensure that in the future the surplus cash is transferred to the residual receipts account within the 60 day timeframe required by HUD.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

CFDA 14.181 Section 811 Capital AdvanceCriteria: Non-profit owners are required to deposit surplus cash into their residual receipts account within 60 days after year end.Condition: The 2018 required deposit to the residual receipts account was not made in a timely manner.Questioned Costs: $0Context: The required deposit was not made in a timely manner due to an unintentional oversight and is an isolated event.Effect: The residual receipts account is not in compliance with HUD requirements.Cause: The transfer was not made from the operating bank account to the residual receipts bank account in a timely manner.Recommendation: The Project should make the required transfer and ensure that in the future the surplus cash is transferred to the residual receipts account within the 60 day timeframe required by HUD.

Corrective Action Plan

The Project made the required transfer and will ensure in the future that the surplus cash is deposited into the residual receipts account within 60 days of year-end.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$826,692 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2019 — management decision was due September 30, 2019.

2018-001
Special Tests & Provisions
REPEAT OF 2017-001OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2018-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed →

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$825,812 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2018 — management decision was due September 30, 2018.

2017-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$826,844 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 30, 2017 — management decision was due January 30, 2018.

2016-001
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.