← Back to home

THE CATHEDRAL SQUARE CORPORATIONNon-Profit

EIN: 431114421

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN, PC

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

THE CATHEDRAL SQUARE CORPORATION5 audit years1 findings
5
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2020)

FY 2020-10-15

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,028,113 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 21, 2021 (1716 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

Allowable costs - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Project Assistance Contract), CFDA 14.157, and Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects, CFDA 14.155, 2020 award year. Criteria - Project funds must be used only for expenses that are reasonable and necessary to the operation of the project as provided for in the Regulatory Agreement between HUD and the project owner (24 CFR section 891.400(e)) Condition - Fees related to sale of the Project in the amount of $1,800 were expensed by the property during the period from January 1, 2020 through October 15, 2020 and repayment of this amount did not occur to the Project during the period ended October 15, 2020. Questioned Costs - Expenses were overstated by $1,800 during the period ended October 15, 2020. Context - The Project paid for expenses related to the sale which should have been covered by the project sponsor. Effect - The Project paid for expenses related to the sale which should have been covered by the project sponsor. Cause - The management company responsible for the preparation of the financial records did not have the proper information, training and knowledge of the program to ensure that only allowable costs are included within the project reports. Recommendation - The management company responsible for the preparation of the financial records should review its accounting and reporting policies to ensure that steps are added to include a review for unallowable costs. In addition the project sponsor should repay incurred expenses to the Project as soon as possible. Identification as a Repeat Finding - This is not a repeat finding. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions - See Corrective Action Plan.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Allowable costs - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Project Assistance Contract), CFDA 14.157, and Mortgage Insurance for the Purchase or Refinancing of Existing Multifamily Housing Projects, CFDA 14.155, 2020 award year. Criteria - Project funds must be used only for expenses that are reasonable and necessary to the operation of the project as provided for in the Regulatory Agreement between HUD and the project owner (24 CFR section 891.400(e)) Condition - Fees related to sale of the Project in the amount of $1,800 were expensed by the property during the period from January 1, 2020 through October 15, 2020 and repayment of this amount did not occur to the Project during the period ended October 15, 2020. Questioned Costs - Expenses were overstated by $1,800 during the period ended October 15, 2020. Context - The Project paid for expenses related to the sale which should have been covered by the project sponsor. Effect - The Project paid for expenses related to the sale which should have been covered by the project sponsor. Cause - The management company responsible for the preparation of the financial records did not have the proper information, training and knowledge of the program to ensure that only allowable costs are included within the project reports. Recommendation - The management company responsible for the preparation of the financial records should review its accounting and reporting policies to ensure that steps are added to include a review for unallowable costs. In addition the project sponsor should repay incurred expenses to the Project as soon as possible. Identification as a Repeat Finding - This is not a repeat finding. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions - See Corrective Action Plan.

Corrective Action Plan

Condition: Fees related to sale of the Project in the amount of $1,800 were expensed by the property during the period from January 1, 2020 through October 15, 2020 and repayment of this amount did not occur to the Project during the period ended October 15, 2020. Views of Responsible Officials and Corrective Actions: We agree with the auditor's comments, and the following action have been taken to improve this situation. The funds have been repaid to the operating account. This payment was similar to other payments made to the appraiser in relation to rent comparability studies which were eligible to be paid from the operating account. It was an administrative over site, as a result of staffing transitions that delayed the repayment of the funds until after the end of the audit period. Individual(s) responsible for corrective action: Christie Dade, Housing Development Director Anticipated completion date: Funds repaid January 11, 2021 and completed. No further corrective action required.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,147,599 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2020 — management decision was due January 22, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,184,164 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 11, 2019 — management decision was due December 11, 2019.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,264,987 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 7, 2018 — management decision was due December 7, 2018.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,322,684 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 29, 2017 — management decision was due November 29, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.