← Back to home

MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF AREA AGENCIES ON AGINGNon-Profit

EIN: 431101962

UEI: VSSXS2CLUWG7

Audited by: McBride, Lock & Associates, LLC

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

MISSOURI ASSOCIATION OF AREA AGENCIES ON AGING8 audit years2 findings
8
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,351,043 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 13, 2026 (12 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,983,496 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2025 — management decision was due September 24, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,467,374 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2024 — management decision was due September 20, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$847,370 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2023 — management decision was due September 28, 2023.

2022-001
Reporting
OTHER MATTERS

The organization did not complete the required reporting for first-tier subawards on the Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grant award from the U.S. Department of Health and Senior Services. There were 5 subawards made to Area Agencies on Aging under this award totaling $379,574 that exceeded the $30,000 reporting threshold. Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the requirement. Effect: The organization was not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement regarding reporting of subawards. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of FFATA and ensure that all applicable subawards made with federal funds are reported to FSRS as required.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001: FFATA Reporting Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: N/A Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.332 Program Title: Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-facilitated Exchanges Pass-through Entity Identifying Number: N/A Award Year: 2021-2022 Questioned Costs: None Criteria: The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) implemented requirements at 2 CFR Part 170 that require recipients of direct grants and cooperative agreements from the federal government to report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more. Recipients should report using the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System (FSRS). The grant agreement for the organization?s Navigator grant awarded in September 2021 included an award term that requires FFATA reporting. Condition: The organization did not complete the required reporting for first-tier subawards on the Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grant award from the U.S. Department of Health and Senior Services. There were 5 subawards made to Area Agencies on Aging under this award totaling $379,574 that exceeded the $30,000 reporting threshold. Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the requirement. Effect: The organization was not in compliance with the terms and conditions of the grant agreement regarding reporting of subawards. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of FFATA and ensure that all applicable subawards made with federal funds are reported to FSRS as required.

Corrective Action Plan

We are working with our fiscal agent to complete the required reporting for first-tier subawards on the Navigator 9 grant. We will complete the missed reporting and develop a reporting schedule to comply with this requirement going forward.

About Reporting →
2022-002
Cost Allowability
MODIFIED OPINIONQUESTIONED COSTS

During the fiscal year, the organization elected to begin using the de minimis 10% indirect cost rate on its federal awards. However, the 10% rate was applied to a base that did not exclude the portion of direct subaward costs that exceeded $25,000. This resulted in excess indirect costs being charged to the organization?s Navigator 8 (NAVCA190351-02-02) and Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grants as follows: "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirement to limit subrecipient expenses to the first $25,000 per subaward. Effect: The inclusion of the portion of each subaward greater than $25,000 in the MTDC base resulted in more indirect costs being charged to federal awards during the fiscal year than were allowable under the de minimis indirect cost rate election. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and ensure that the MTDC base is properly applied in future federal grants.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-002: Application of De Minimis Indirect Cost Rate Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-Through Grantor: N/A Federal Assistance Listing Number: 93.332 Program Title: Cooperative Agreement to Support Navigators in Federally-facilitated Exchanges Pass-through Entity Identifying Number: N/A Award Year: 2020-2021; 2021-2022 Questioned Costs: $35,716 Criteria: The Uniform Guidance allows nonfederal entities that have never received a negotiated indirect cost rate to elect to charge a de minimis rate of 10% of modified total direct costs (MTDC) to federal awards. If elected, the rate must be used consistently for all of an organization?s federal awards. 2 CFR 200.1 defines MTDC as ?all direct salaries and wages, applicable fringe benefits, materials and supplies, services, travel, and up to the first $25,000 of each subaward?? Condition: During the fiscal year, the organization elected to begin using the de minimis 10% indirect cost rate on its federal awards. However, the 10% rate was applied to a base that did not exclude the portion of direct subaward costs that exceeded $25,000. This resulted in excess indirect costs being charged to the organization?s Navigator 8 (NAVCA190351-02-02) and Navigator 9 (NAVCA210402-01-01) grants as follows: "See Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs for chart/table" Cause: The organization has had turnover in the Executive Director and contracted accounting positions in the past two fiscal years and the current management was not aware of the Uniform Guidance requirement to limit subrecipient expenses to the first $25,000 per subaward. Effect: The inclusion of the portion of each subaward greater than $25,000 in the MTDC base resulted in more indirect costs being charged to federal awards during the fiscal year than were allowable under the de minimis indirect cost rate election. Recommendation: We recommend that the organization review the requirements of the Uniform Guidance and ensure that the MTDC base is properly applied in future federal grants.

Corrective Action Plan

We are working with our fiscal agent to review the requirements of the Uniform Guidance to ensure that the MTDC base is properly applied in future federal grants.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2021-06-30

$1,043,954 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2022 — management decision was due September 17, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$782,763 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 16, 2021 — management decision was due September 16, 2021.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,117,922 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 2, 2017 — management decision was due May 2, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,048,686 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 2, 2016 — management decision was due May 2, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Missouri

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.