← Back to home

LENOX COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 426037857

UEI: DGHPZSD4NL29

Audited by: Nolte, Cornman & Johnson

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

LENOX COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT3 audit years3 findings2 repeat
3
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$878.9K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

$878,896 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 24, 2025 (382 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2023-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Equipment & Real Property / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2022-002

One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. We noted one individual has control over portions of one or more of the following areas for the District relating to major federal programs; cash, inventories, receipts, disbursements, payroll, wire transfers, transfers, computer systems and manual journal entries. See finding 2023 001.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. We noted one individual has control over portions of one or more of the following areas for the District relating to major federal programs; cash, inventories, receipts, disbursements, payroll, wire transfers, transfers, computer systems and manual journal entries. See finding 2023 001.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will continue to review the duties of office employees and segregate duties where possible.

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Equipment and Real Property Management, Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

$988,925 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 8, 2024 — management decision was due October 8, 2024.

2022-002
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2021-001

One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. We noted one individual has control over portions of one or more of the following areas for the District relating to major federal programs; cash, inventories, receipts, disbursements, payroll, wire transfers, transfers, computer systems and manual journal entries. See finding 2022 001.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. We noted one individual has control over portions of one or more of the following areas for the District relating to major federal programs; cash, inventories, receipts, disbursements, payroll, wire transfers, transfers, computer systems and manual journal entries. See finding 2022 001.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will continue to review the duties of office employees and segregate duties where possible.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

$835,506 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 16, 2023 — management decision was due August 16, 2023.

2021-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

Segregation of Duties Criteria - Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody, and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition - One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. One individual has control over one or more of the following areas for the District: 1) Cash - handling and recording cash, posting and reconciling. 2) Investments - investing, detailed recordkeeping, custody of investments and reconciling earnings. 3) Receipts - collecting, recording, depositing, journalizing, posting and reconciling. 4) Disbursements - check preparation, mailing and recording. 5) Payroll - recordkeeping, preparation, posting, and distribution. 6) Wire Transfers - processing and approving. 7) Transfers - processing and approving. 8) Computer systems - performing all general accounting functions and controlling all data input and output. 9) Journal entries - writing, approving, and posting. 10) School lunch program - journalizing, posting, reconciling, purchase order processing, check preparation, mailing and recording. Cause - The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect - Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors, or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation - We realize that with a limited number of office employees, segregation of duties is difficult. However, the District should review its control procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties Criteria - Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody, and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition - One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. One individual has control over one or more of the following areas for the District: 1) Cash - handling and recording cash, posting and reconciling. 2) Investments - investing, detailed recordkeeping, custody of investments and reconciling earnings. 3) Receipts - collecting, recording, depositing, journalizing, posting and reconciling. 4) Disbursements - check preparation, mailing and recording. 5) Payroll - recordkeeping, preparation, posting, and distribution. 6) Wire Transfers - processing and approving. 7) Transfers - processing and approving. 8) Computer systems - performing all general accounting functions and controlling all data input and output. 9) Journal entries - writing, approving, and posting. 10) School lunch program - journalizing, posting, reconciling, purchase order processing, check preparation, mailing and recording. Cause - The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect - Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors, or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation - We realize that with a limited number of office employees, segregation of duties is difficult. However, the District should review its control procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances.

Corrective Action Plan

The District will continue to review the duties of office employees and segregate duties where possible.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.