← Back to home

WEST LYON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 426036813

UEI: S1D8LX3FK8E1

Audited by: EIDE BAILLY LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

WEST LYON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT3 audit years3 findings1 repeat
3
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$988.8K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2023)

FY 2023-06-30

$988,847 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 7, 2024. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 7, 2024 (726 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2023-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-003

The District did not ensure proper and timely inclusion of prevailing wage rate clauses in one construction contract. Cause: Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect: Lack of compliance to federal requirements increases the overall risk of non‐compliance. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: Overall compliance requirement Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2023‐003 Department of Education Elementary and School Emergency Relief CFDA No. 84.425U Special Tests – Wage Rate Requirement Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR 656.40 through 656.41 set forth the standards nonfederal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs for wage rates. Condition: The District did not ensure proper and timely inclusion of prevailing wage rate clauses in one construction contract. Cause: Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect: Lack of compliance to federal requirements increases the overall risk of non‐compliance. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: Overall compliance requirement Repeat Finding from Prior Year: Yes Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 2023‐003 Special Tests – Wage Rate Requirement Significant Deficiency Finding Summary: The District did not sure proper and timely inclusion of prevailing wage clauses in one construction contract issued in the prior year and still in effect this year. Responsible Individuals: Shawn Kreman, Superintendent Corrective Action Plan: The District will include prevailing requirements in contracts utilizing federal dollars. Anticipated Completion Date: Ongoing

Prior Finding References

2022-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

$1,604,885 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2023 — management decision was due September 12, 2023.

2022-003
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District did not ensure proper and timely inclusion of prevailing wage rate clauses in one construction contract and also did not obtain proper support to ensure required certified payrolls were submitted in a timely fashion. Cause: Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect: Lack of compliance to federal requirements increases the overall risk of non-compliance. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: Overall compliance requirement Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Uniform Guidance and 2 CFR 656.40 through 656.41 set forth the standards nonfederal entities other than states must follow when operating federal programs for wage rates. Condition: The District did not ensure proper and timely inclusion of prevailing wage rate clauses in one construction contract and also did not obtain proper support to ensure required certified payrolls were submitted in a timely fashion. Cause: Lack of oversight, awareness, or understanding of all of the specific requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections, and controls were not adequately designed to ensure compliance with all of these requirements. Effect: Lack of compliance to federal requirements increases the overall risk of non-compliance. Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: Overall compliance requirement Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: We recommend that management establish controls to follow all applicable requirements under Uniform Guidance and applicable CFR sections. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

A thorough review of certified payrolls will be completed for each week a contractor is performing work under federal program and the District will include prevailing wage requirements in contracts utilizing federal dollars.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

$881,451 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2022 — management decision was due September 21, 2022.

2021-003
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The District has limited staff involved in the process over federal cash draw requests and processes and therefore does not have segregation of duties relating to preparation, review, and approval of federal cash draws. Cause: The federal draws of the district are not reviewed or approved before submitting for reimbursement. The individual preparing the draw also submits the draw without additional review. Effect: Inadequate controls over cash management results in the likelihood that the District would not be able to detect or prevent errors in federal cash draws Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 4 federal cash draw requests out of 12 federal cash draw requests were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The District should implement a review process over the cash draw process of the federal grant draws. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Proper controls over cash management include an adequate system for compilation, review, and approval over federal cash draw processes. Condition: The District has limited staff involved in the process over federal cash draw requests and processes and therefore does not have segregation of duties relating to preparation, review, and approval of federal cash draws. Cause: The federal draws of the district are not reviewed or approved before submitting for reimbursement. The individual preparing the draw also submits the draw without additional review. Effect: Inadequate controls over cash management results in the likelihood that the District would not be able to detect or prevent errors in federal cash draws Questioned Costs: None Context/Sampling: A nonstatistical sample of 4 federal cash draw requests out of 12 federal cash draw requests were selected for testing. Repeat Finding from Prior Year: No Recommendation: The District should implement a review process over the cash draw process of the federal grant draws. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

A thorough review of all grant requests will take place prior to submission of meal counts for reimbursement. This review will be done at both the accounting staff and accounting supervisory levels.

About Cash Management →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.