EIN: 426023437
UEI: KMHFRJCEKU98
Audited by: Eide Bailly LLP
Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 17, 2026 (78 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on October 21, 2024 — management decision was due April 21, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on February 29, 2024 — management decision was due August 29, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 15, 2023 — management decision was due September 15, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on July 6, 2022 — management decision was due January 6, 2023.
During the process of identifying expenses that were incurred to prevent, prepare for or respond to the coronavirus pandemic, it was noted that mortgage interest expenses and insurance expenses were not reduced by amounts reimbursable from other sources, namely Medicare. Cause: Due to the amount of detailed information that was required to be compiled by management in order to enter data into the PRF reporting portal, management inadvertently included in eligible expenses certain costs that were not reduced by amounts reimbursable from Medicare. Effect: Management included amounts in the PRF reporting portal which were not eligible based on the terms and conditions of the PRF distributions. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs related to CFDA #93.498 amounted to $325,891 ($244,705 related to mortgage interest expense and $81,186 related to insurance expense). Context: The PRF and HRSA guidance states that costs cannot be used to reimburse expenses or losses that have been or are obligated to be reimbursed by other sources. Certain interest and insurance expenses were identified as being included in the PRF reporting portal without being reduced by the portion reimbursable from Medicare. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to monitor and enhance its internal controls over federal award compliance to ensure that only eligible costs are included in amounts expended and that the same expenses are not reimbursed by other sources. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the noted finding. However, the Hospital also incurred and reported significant unreimbursed expenses in the PRF reporting portal that if the noted questioned costs had not been reported, the Hospital would have satisfactorily incurred eligible expenses in excess of the PRF funds received, including interest earned on such funds. Management will continue to refine processes to more diligently review expenses to ensure that expenses are not being utilized for reimbursement from multiple sources.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Federal Program: Federal Financial Assistance Listing #93.498 US Department of Health and Human Services COVID-19 - Provider Relief Fund and American Rescue Plan (ARP) Rural Distribution Criteria: The terms and conditions of the CARES Act Provider Relief Fund (PRF) distributions state that funds are not to be used to reimburse expenses or losses that have been reimbursed from other sources or that other sources are obligated to reimburse. Condition: During the process of identifying expenses that were incurred to prevent, prepare for or respond to the coronavirus pandemic, it was noted that mortgage interest expenses and insurance expenses were not reduced by amounts reimbursable from other sources, namely Medicare. Cause: Due to the amount of detailed information that was required to be compiled by management in order to enter data into the PRF reporting portal, management inadvertently included in eligible expenses certain costs that were not reduced by amounts reimbursable from Medicare. Effect: Management included amounts in the PRF reporting portal which were not eligible based on the terms and conditions of the PRF distributions. Questioned Costs: Total questioned costs related to CFDA #93.498 amounted to $325,891 ($244,705 related to mortgage interest expense and $81,186 related to insurance expense). Context: The PRF and HRSA guidance states that costs cannot be used to reimburse expenses or losses that have been or are obligated to be reimbursed by other sources. Certain interest and insurance expenses were identified as being included in the PRF reporting portal without being reduced by the portion reimbursable from Medicare. Recommendation: We recommend that management continue to monitor and enhance its internal controls over federal award compliance to ensure that only eligible costs are included in amounts expended and that the same expenses are not reimbursed by other sources. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action: Management agrees with the noted finding. However, the Hospital also incurred and reported significant unreimbursed expenses in the PRF reporting portal that if the noted questioned costs had not been reported, the Hospital would have satisfactorily incurred eligible expenses in excess of the PRF funds received, including interest earned on such funds. Management will continue to refine processes to more diligently review expenses to ensure that expenses are not being utilized for reimbursement from multiple sources.
Management agrees with the noted finding. However, the Hospital also incurred and reported significant unreimbursed expenses in the PRF reporting portal that if the noted questioned costs had not been reported, the Hospital would have satisfactorily incurred eligible expenses in excess of the PRF funds received, including interest earned on such funds. Management will continue to refine processes to more diligently review expenses to ensure that expenses are not being utilized for reimbursement from multiple sources.
FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2018 — management decision was due March 13, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on October 31, 2017 — management decision was due May 1, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.