EIN: 426020126
UEI: QZRTUMSDBD33
Audited by: TrustPoint, LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 28, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 1, 2026 (33 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on March 31, 2025 — management decision was due October 1, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on April 1, 2024 — management decision was due October 1, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on March 27, 2023 — management decision was due September 27, 2023.
The District does not have written policies and procedures as required by Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District was not aware of the written policies and procedures requirement within Uniform Guidance. Effect: Not having written policies and procedures puts the District in a position of not complying with Uniform Compliance. Recommendation: The District should prepare written policies and procedures to comply with Uniform Guidance. Response: We will prepare written policies and procedures to comply with Uniform Guidance. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2022-002 Written Policies Criteria: Uniform Guidance requires Districts to have documented written policies and procedures for Federal program compliance requirement areas. Condition: The District does not have written policies and procedures as required by Uniform Guidance. Cause: The District was not aware of the written policies and procedures requirement within Uniform Guidance. Effect: Not having written policies and procedures puts the District in a position of not complying with Uniform Compliance. Recommendation: The District should prepare written policies and procedures to comply with Uniform Guidance. Response: We will prepare written policies and procedures to comply with Uniform Guidance. Conclusion: Response accepted.
We will update our written policies to include the required written policies under Uniform Guidance.
The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the writing, posting an approval of journal entries, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in recording, approving pay rates and deductions, recordkeeping , preparation, posting and distribution of payroll, which are incompatible internal controls. Cause: The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Effect: Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response: We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion: Response accepted.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Segregation of Duties Criteria: We noted during our audit the district did not properly segregate payroll and journal entries including those related to federal programs. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition: The District has primarily one employee who is involved in the writing, posting an approval of journal entries, which are incompatible internal controls. The District has primarily one employee who is involved in recording, approving pay rates and deductions, recordkeeping , preparation, posting and distribution of payroll, which are incompatible internal controls. Cause: The District has a limited number of employees and some procedures have been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. However, adequate segregation of duties has not been achieved. Effect: Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response: We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion: Response accepted.
We have reviewed our procedures and will continue to review our procedures to segregate duties to the extent possible. However, our District has limited employees due to size, which makes adequate segregation of duties difficult.
FAC accepted this audit on June 21, 2022 — management decision was due December 21, 2022.
One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. We noted one individual has control over portions of one or more of the following areas for the District relating to federal programs; cash, investments, receipts, disbursements, payroll, financial reporting, School lunch program and journal entries. See finding II-A-21.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴One important aspect of the internal control structure is the segregation of duties among employees to prevent an individual employee from handling duties which are incompatible. We noted one individual has control over portions of one or more of the following areas for the District relating to federal programs; cash, investments, receipts, disbursements, payroll, financial reporting, School lunch program and journal entries. See finding II-A-21.
The Algona School District is continually thinking of new ways to segregate duties and will continue to do so in the future.
FAC accepted this audit on April 11, 2021 — management decision was due October 11, 2021.
We noted during our audit the District did not properly segregate payroll and journal entries including those related to federal programs. See II-A-20.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴We noted during our audit the District did not properly segregate payroll and journal entries including those related to federal programs. See II-A-20.
We will review our procedures to see how we can do things differently.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.