← Back to home

Allamakee CountyLocal Government

EIN: 426005341

UEI: CPNFLT3252F1

Audited by: Hacker, Nelson & Co., P.C.

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Allamakee County5 audit years5 findings4 repeat
5
Audit Years
5
Total Findings
4
Repeat Findings
$1.5M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,478,418 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 22, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 22, 2026 (24 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2024-001

The County’s offices are not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties for effective internal controls. Management has not separated incompatible activities of personnel, thereby creating risks related to the safeguarding of cash and the accuracy of the financial statements. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the County’s financial statements. Cause: The concentration of closely related duties and responsibilities such as the recording and processing of cash receipts, preparing grant expenditure reports, preparing financial information for posting and analyzing financial information by a small staff makes it impossible to establish an adequate system of automatic internal checks on the accuracy and reliability of the accounting records. Effect: This deficiency results in a reasonable possibility that the County would not be able to detect misstatements that would be material in relation to the financial statements and/or federal award programs in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: The County should review the operating procedures of the County offices to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. While we do recognize that the County is not large enough to permit a segregation of duties for effective internal controls, we believe it is important the Board be aware that this condition does exist. Repeat Finding: Yes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is cognizant of this limitation and will implement additional procedures where possible.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: The County’s offices are not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties for effective internal controls. Management has not separated incompatible activities of personnel, thereby creating risks related to the safeguarding of cash and the accuracy of the financial statements. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the County’s financial statements. Cause: The concentration of closely related duties and responsibilities such as the recording and processing of cash receipts, preparing grant expenditure reports, preparing financial information for posting and analyzing financial information by a small staff makes it impossible to establish an adequate system of automatic internal checks on the accuracy and reliability of the accounting records. Effect: This deficiency results in a reasonable possibility that the County would not be able to detect misstatements that would be material in relation to the financial statements and/or federal award programs in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: The County should review the operating procedures of the County offices to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. While we do recognize that the County is not large enough to permit a segregation of duties for effective internal controls, we believe it is important the Board be aware that this condition does exist. Repeat Finding: Yes. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is cognizant of this limitation and will implement additional procedures where possible.

Corrective Action Plan

Management is cognizant of this limitation and will implement additional procedures where possible.

Prior Finding References

2024-001

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting →

FY 2022-06-30

$775,818 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2023 — management decision was due September 28, 2023.

2022-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Reporting / Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The County?s offices are not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties for effective internal controls. Management has not separated incompatible activities of personnel, thereby creating risks related to the safeguarding of cash and the accuracy of the financial statements. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the County?s financial statements. Cause: The concentration of closely related duties and responsibilities such as the recording and processing of cash receipts, preparing grant expenditure reports, preparing financial information for posting and analyzing financial information by a small staff makes it impossible to establish an adequate system of automatic internal checks on the accuracy and reliability of the accounting records. Effect: This deficiency results in a reasonable possibility that the County would not be able to detect misstatements that would be material in relation to the financial statements and/or federal award programs in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: The County should review the operating procedures of the County offices to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. While we do recognize that the County is not large enough to permit a segregation of duties for effective internal controls, we believe it is important the Board be aware that this condition does exist. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is cognizant of this limitation and will implement additional procedures where possible.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2022-001 Overlapping Duties Condition: The County?s offices are not large enough to permit an adequate segregation of duties for effective internal controls. Management has not separated incompatible activities of personnel, thereby creating risks related to the safeguarding of cash and the accuracy of the financial statements. Criteria: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the County?s financial statements. Cause: The concentration of closely related duties and responsibilities such as the recording and processing of cash receipts, preparing grant expenditure reports, preparing financial information for posting and analyzing financial information by a small staff makes it impossible to establish an adequate system of automatic internal checks on the accuracy and reliability of the accounting records. Effect: This deficiency results in a reasonable possibility that the County would not be able to detect misstatements that would be material in relation to the financial statements and/or federal award programs in a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation: The County should review the operating procedures of the County offices to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. While we do recognize that the County is not large enough to permit a segregation of duties for effective internal controls, we believe it is important the Board be aware that this condition does exist. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: Management is cognizant of this limitation and will implement additional procedures where possible.

Corrective Action Plan

CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN March 2, 2023 To: U.S. Department of Treasury Allamakee County respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended June 30, 2022. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Hacker, Nelson & Co., CPAs 123 W. Water Street Decorah, IA 52101 Audit period: Year ended June 30, 2022. The finding from the June 30, 2022 schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDING - FEDERAL AWARDS PROGRAM AUDIT U.S. Department of Treasury: Federal Assistance Listing Number 21.027 - COVID-19, Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Significant Deficiency: See Finding 2022-001 Recommendation: The County should review the operating procedures of the County offices to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. While we do recognize that the County is not large enough to permit a segregation of duties for effective internal controls, we believe it is important the Board be aware that this condition does exist. Action taken: Management is cognizant of this limitation and will implement additional procedures where possible. If the U.S. Department of Treasury has questions regarding this plan, please call Denise Beyer, County Auditor, at 563-568-3522. Sincerely yours, Denise Beyer Allamakee County Auditor cc: Neil W. Schraeder, CPA

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Period of Performance, Procurement and Suspension and Debarment, Reporting, Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,107,526 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2019 — management decision was due September 26, 2019.

2018-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Eligibility / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Reporting / Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$970,481 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2018 — management decision was due September 18, 2018.

2017-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Eligibility / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Reporting / Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,334,793 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2017 — management decision was due September 11, 2017.

2016-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Equipment & Real Property / Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking / Period of Performance / Procurement & Suspension/Debarment / Program Income / Reporting / Subrecipient Monitoring / Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.