EIN: 421571876
UEI: V8KJLQJHMLQ1
Audited by: BST & Co. CPAs, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of August 31, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 7, 2026 (56 days ago).
What is a management decision? →Criteria or specific requirement: As a recipient of federal grant funds, the Center is expected to comply with procurement regulations applicable to federal grantees via an established written procurement policy, in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Condition and context: The Center’s written Procurement Policy does not comply with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The cause is due to a lack of understanding of the requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with the Uniform Guidance, the Center may not exhaust all efforts to award contract(s) under a process where maximum competition is achieved in order to obtain the most reasonable price. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Procurement Policy that adheres to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: As a recipient of federal grant funds, the Center is expected to comply with procurement regulations applicable to federal grantees via an established written procurement policy, in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Condition and context: The Center’s written Procurement Policy does not comply with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The cause is due to a lack of understanding of the requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance. Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with the Uniform Guidance, the Center may not exhaust all efforts to award contract(s) under a process where maximum competition is achieved in order to obtain the most reasonable price. Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Procurement Policy that adheres to the Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2026, the finance department and purchasing department led by Veronica Koller, CFO, will work to revise the current procurement policy to ensure that it complies with the Uniform Guidance.
2024-004
FAC accepted this audit on May 28, 2025 — management decision was due November 28, 2025.
Criteria or specific requirement: The Health Center Program (93.224) requires grantees to prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition and context: Internal review processes were not completed for nine individuals that received the Sliding Fee Discount. Cause: There is limited review of entry into the internal database for eligibility. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Center may provide discounts to ineligible patients.Questioned costs: None.Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The Sliding Fee Discount process had a finding last year whereby two individuals who received the discount were not eligible. This was due to the lack of a review process. Recommendation: The Center should ensure that internal control processes for the Sliding Fee Discount policy are consistently followed. A review process should be in place for all patient information entered into the Center’s billing software. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: The Health Center Program (93.224) requires grantees to prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition and context: Internal review processes were not completed for nine individuals that received the Sliding Fee Discount. Cause: There is limited review of entry into the internal database for eligibility. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Center may provide discounts to ineligible patients.Questioned costs: None.Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: The Sliding Fee Discount process had a finding last year whereby two individuals who received the discount were not eligible. This was due to the lack of a review process. Recommendation: The Center should ensure that internal control processes for the Sliding Fee Discount policy are consistently followed. A review process should be in place for all patient information entered into the Center’s billing software. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Previously, all sliding fee scale applications were reviewed and processed by the billing manager. Effective September 10, 2024, the Center assigned a specific billing specialist (Stephanie Rivera Rivera) to process the sliding fee scale applications. Billing managers’ responsibilities now include auditing the applications that are processed by the billing specialist. The auditing process completed by the billing manager, Yeny Roggie, is to ensure that the application is complete and that the proper sliding fee scale was offered to the patient.
2023-003
Criteria or specific requirement: As a recipient of federal grant funds, the Center is expected to comply with procurement regulations applicable to federal grantees via an established written procurement policy, in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Condition and context: The Center’s written Procurement Policy does not comply with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The cause is due to a lack of understanding of the requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance.Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with the Uniform Guidance in place, the Center may not exhaust all efforts to award contract(s) under a process where maximum competition is achieved in order to obtain the most reasonable price.Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Procurement Policy that adheres to the Uniform Guidance requirements.Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: As a recipient of federal grant funds, the Center is expected to comply with procurement regulations applicable to federal grantees via an established written procurement policy, in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Condition and context: The Center’s written Procurement Policy does not comply with the Uniform Guidance. Cause: The cause is due to a lack of understanding of the requirements outlined in the Uniform Guidance.Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with the Uniform Guidance in place, the Center may not exhaust all efforts to award contract(s) under a process where maximum competition is achieved in order to obtain the most reasonable price.Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Procurement Policy that adheres to the Uniform Guidance requirements.Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
During the fiscal year June 30, 2025, the finance department and purchasing department led by Veronica Koller, CFO will work together to revise the current procurement policy to ensure it complies with Uniform Guidance.
2023-005
Criteria or specific requirement: As a recipient of federal grant funds, the Center is expected to comply with cash management regulations applicable to federal grantees via an established written drawdown policy, in accordance with Title 2 U.S. CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance.Condition and context: The Center did not have an established control process in place in relation to the drawdown of federal funds. Cause: The cause is due to staffing turnover experienced within the Center.Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with the Uniform Guidance, the Center may draw down inaccurate or inappropriate federal funds. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Drawdown Policy that adheres to the Uniform Guidance requirements, which includes a review by the CFO. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: As a recipient of federal grant funds, the Center is expected to comply with cash management regulations applicable to federal grantees via an established written drawdown policy, in accordance with Title 2 U.S. CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (the Uniform Guidance.Condition and context: The Center did not have an established control process in place in relation to the drawdown of federal funds. Cause: The cause is due to staffing turnover experienced within the Center.Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with the Uniform Guidance, the Center may draw down inaccurate or inappropriate federal funds. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Drawdown Policy that adheres to the Uniform Guidance requirements, which includes a review by the CFO. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
During the fiscal year June 30, 2025, a process for drawing down federal funds was established. Veronica Koller, CFO requests approval for drawdown of the funds from either the COO, Magdalena Nichols or Controller, Hannah Pawlowski. Once approval is provided, the CFO draws down the federal funds.
Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.512, the Center is required to complete and submit the data collection form within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition and context: The Center did not submit the single audit within the required period for submission.Cause: The Center did not have sufficient staffing in place to properly monitor and adhere to the respective due dates.Effect or potential effect: The Center did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.512.Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: Staffing should be sufficient to ensure that all external reports are prepared and submitted on a timely basis. Staffing should contemplate not only the preparation of the various reports but also a formal, documented review process.Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.512, the Center is required to complete and submit the data collection form within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition and context: The Center did not submit the single audit within the required period for submission.Cause: The Center did not have sufficient staffing in place to properly monitor and adhere to the respective due dates.Effect or potential effect: The Center did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.512.Identification as a repeat finding, if applicable: This is a repeat finding from the prior year. Recommendation: Staffing should be sufficient to ensure that all external reports are prepared and submitted on a timely basis. Staffing should contemplate not only the preparation of the various reports but also a formal, documented review process.Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
In July 2024, the Chief Financial Officer, Veronica Koller, was hired, along with an Accounting Manager, Nicole Sullivan in September 2024. The staffing of these two positions, along with the Controller, Hannah Pawlowski, will ensure that the completion of the financial statements and single audits for the period of June 30, 2025 will occur in time necessary to submit the data collection form within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or nine months after the end of the audit period
2023-007
FAC accepted this audit on July 31, 2024 — management decision was due January 31, 2025.
Two individuals that received the Sliding Fee Discount were not eligible based on income. Cause: This was due to a clerical error entered into the Center’s internal database. There is no review process of entry into the internal database for eligibility. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Center may provide discounts to ineligible patients. Recommendation: The Center should establish internal control processes for the Sliding Fee Discount policy as a whole. A review process should be in place for all patient information entered into the Center’s billing software. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-003: Sliding Fee Discount Processes Criteria or specific requirement: The Health Center Program (93.224) requires grantees to prepare and apply a sliding fee discount schedule (SFDS) so that the amounts owed for health center services by eligible patients are adjusted (discounted) based on the patient’s ability to pay. Condition: Two individuals that received the Sliding Fee Discount were not eligible based on income. Cause: This was due to a clerical error entered into the Center’s internal database. There is no review process of entry into the internal database for eligibility. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Center may provide discounts to ineligible patients. Recommendation: The Center should establish internal control processes for the Sliding Fee Discount policy as a whole. A review process should be in place for all patient information entered into the Center’s billing software. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
The Sliding Fee Discount Program policy was updated in March 2024, by Magdalena Nichols, the Chief Operating Officer, to add that the Billing Manager or his/her designee will review all Sliding Fee Scale (SFS) applications on a monthly basis for accuracy. To reduce clerical errors associated with the entry of data into the billing system, the SFS calculation was also added to the SFS application to ensure that we are offering the right SFS rate so that it can be verified at a later point.
The Center did not prepare a SEFA that was accurate and complete in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, as there were three programs missing from the original SEFA that was provided for audit. Cause: The cause is due to limited internal controls related to the preparation and review of the SEFA and the understanding of which items should be included. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Center may not identify all federal awards received and related compliance and reporting requirements applicable to each award. Recommendation: The Center must assign individuals who are experienced and knowledgeable in the compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance to monitor all federal grants received to ensure that the Center has met the applicable compliance and reporting requirements of each federal award. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-004: Accurate and Complete Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Criteria or specific requirement: The Center must prepare a SEFA that is accurate and complete in accordance with Title 2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Condition: The Center did not prepare a SEFA that was accurate and complete in accordance with the Uniform Guidance, as there were three programs missing from the original SEFA that was provided for audit. Cause: The cause is due to limited internal controls related to the preparation and review of the SEFA and the understanding of which items should be included. Effect or potential effect: Without adequate controls over this process, the Center may not identify all federal awards received and related compliance and reporting requirements applicable to each award. Recommendation: The Center must assign individuals who are experienced and knowledgeable in the compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance to monitor all federal grants received to ensure that the Center has met the applicable compliance and reporting requirements of each federal award. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
For fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, the finance department, led by Veronica Koller, CFO, with the assistance of the grants department, will be reviewing all grants contracts to properly categorize the funding source as either federal, state, local or private. This review process will allow both the finance and grants departments to prepare a complete and accurate SEFA.
The Center’s written Procurement Policy does not comply with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The cause is due to a lack of understanding of requirements outlined by the Uniform Guidance. Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with Uniform Guidance in place, the Center may not exhaust all efforts to award contract(s) under a process where maximum competition is achieved in order to obtain the most reasonable price. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Procurement Policy that adheres to Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-005: Established Written Procurement Policy Criteria or specific requirement: As a recipient of Federal grant funds, the Center is expected to comply with procurement regulations applicable to Federal grantees via an established written procurement policy, in accordance with Title 2 U.S. CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). Condition: The Center’s written Procurement Policy does not comply with Uniform Guidance. Cause: The cause is due to a lack of understanding of requirements outlined by the Uniform Guidance. Effect or potential effect: Without a policy in place that complies with Uniform Guidance in place, the Center may not exhaust all efforts to award contract(s) under a process where maximum competition is achieved in order to obtain the most reasonable price. Recommendation: The Center should establish a written Procurement Policy that adheres to Uniform Guidance requirements. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
During fiscal year June 30, 2025, the finance department and purchasing department, led by Veronica Koller, CFO, will work together to revise the current procurement policy in place to ensure that it complies with Uniform Guidance.
One Federal Financial Report (SF-425) was submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services after prescribed deadlines. Cause: The Center does not have adequate staffing in place to monitor and adhere to each respective due date. Effect or potential effect: Without proper staffing, the Center could experience ramifications for the lack of timely reporting. Recommendation: The Center must assign individuals who are experienced and knowledgeable in the compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance to monitor all federal grants received to ensure that the Center has met the applicable compliance and reporting requirements of each federal award. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-006: External Financial Reporting Criteria or specific requirement: The Health Center Program (93.224) requires financial reports to be submitted within prescribed deadlines. Condition: One Federal Financial Report (SF-425) was submitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services after prescribed deadlines. Cause: The Center does not have adequate staffing in place to monitor and adhere to each respective due date. Effect or potential effect: Without proper staffing, the Center could experience ramifications for the lack of timely reporting. Recommendation: The Center must assign individuals who are experienced and knowledgeable in the compliance requirements of the Uniform Guidance to monitor all federal grants received to ensure that the Center has met the applicable compliance and reporting requirements of each federal award. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
In July 2024, a CFO, Veronica Koller, was hired and will be included in weekly joint finance department and grant department (Chief Program Officer, Anna Mango, and grant writers) meetings. These meetings, which will be led by Veronica, will be held to ensure that the grant terms are understood, and billing is being performed accurately and timely and all external reporting is performed by the prescribed deadlines.
The Center did not submit the single audit within the required period for submission. Cause: The Center did not have sufficient staffing in place to properly monitor and adhere to the respective due dates. Effect or potential effect: The Center did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation: Staffing should be sufficient to ensure that all external reports are prepared and submitted on a timely basis. Staffing should contemplate not only the preparation of the various reports, but also a formal, documented review process. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-007: Single Audit Report Submission Criteria or specific requirement: In accordance with 2 CFR 200.512, the Center was required to complete and submit the data collection form within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The Center did not submit the single audit within the required period for submission. Cause: The Center did not have sufficient staffing in place to properly monitor and adhere to the respective due dates. Effect or potential effect: The Center did not comply with the requirements of 2 CFR 200.512. Recommendation: Staffing should be sufficient to ensure that all external reports are prepared and submitted on a timely basis. Staffing should contemplate not only the preparation of the various reports, but also a formal, documented review process. Views of responsible officials: Refer to the Corrective Action Plan prepared by the Center in regard to this matter.
In November 2023, a Controller, Hannah Pawlowski, was hired and in July 2024 a Chief Financial Officer, Veronica Koller, was hired to bring the needed staff on hand to ensure that the financial statement and single audits for the period of June 30, 2024, are completed in time necessary to submit the data collection form within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report or nine months after the end of the audit period.
FAC accepted this audit on February 9, 2024 — management decision was due August 9, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 13, 2022 — management decision was due July 13, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on May 13, 2021 — management decision was due November 13, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on March 25, 2020 — management decision was due September 25, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2019 — management decision was due July 10, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 3, 2017 — management decision was due June 3, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on March 2, 2017 — management decision was due September 2, 2017.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
2015-001
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in New York →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.