← Back to home

Belmond-Klemme Community School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 421413770

UEI: J8B3PLTSFV76

Audited by: Kay L Chapman CPA PC

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Belmond-Klemme Community School District5 audit years4 findings2 repeat
5
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$834.2K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$834,185 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 30, 2026 (27 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$871,984 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 13, 2025 — management decision was due September 13, 2025.

2024-002
Cost Allowability / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

The District did not properly segregate custody, record-keeping and reconciling functions for revenues and expenditures, including those related to federal programs. See 2024-001.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

The District did not properly segregate custody, record-keeping and reconciling functions for revenues and expenditures, including those related to federal programs. See 2024-001.

Corrective Action Plan

We have reviewed procedures and plan to make the necessary changes to improve internal control.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Reporting →

FY 2023-06-30

$981,186 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2024 — management decision was due September 28, 2024.

2023-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2022-001

SEGREGATION OF DUTIES: CRITERIA-MANAGEMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING INTERNAL CONTROL. A GOOD SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROL PROVIDES FOR ADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES SO NO ONE INDIVIDUAL HANDLES A TRANSACTION FROM ITS INCEPTION TO COMPLETION. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN PROPER INTERNAL CONTROL, DUTIES SHOULD BE SEGREGATED SO THE AUTHORIZATION, CUSTODY AND RECORDING OF TRANSACTIONS ARE NOT UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE SAME EMPLOYEE. THIS SEGREGATION OF DUTIES HELPS PREVENT LOSSES FROM EMPLOYEE ERROR OR DISHONESTY AND MAXIMIZES THE ACCURACY OF THE DISTRICT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. CONDITION - AN INDEPENDENT PERSON DOES NOT OPEN THE MAIL AND PREPARE AN INITIAL LISTING OF THE CHECKS RECEIVED AND LATER COMPARE THE LISTING TO THE RECEIPTS ISSUED. ALSO, VOUCHERS ARE PROCESSED, CHECKS PREPARED AND DISBURSEMENTS ARE RECORDED BY THE SAME PERSON. IN ADDITION, RECONCILING AND PREPARING OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ENTERING ADJUSTING JOURNAL ENTRIES ARE ALL DONE BY THE SAME PERSON.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

SEGREGATION OF DUTIES: CRITERIA-MANAGEMENT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ESTABLISHING AND MAINTAINING INTERNAL CONTROL. A GOOD SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROL PROVIDES FOR ADEQUATE SEGREGATION OF DUTIES SO NO ONE INDIVIDUAL HANDLES A TRANSACTION FROM ITS INCEPTION TO COMPLETION. IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN PROPER INTERNAL CONTROL, DUTIES SHOULD BE SEGREGATED SO THE AUTHORIZATION, CUSTODY AND RECORDING OF TRANSACTIONS ARE NOT UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE SAME EMPLOYEE. THIS SEGREGATION OF DUTIES HELPS PREVENT LOSSES FROM EMPLOYEE ERROR OR DISHONESTY AND MAXIMIZES THE ACCURACY OF THE DISTRICT'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. CONDITION - AN INDEPENDENT PERSON DOES NOT OPEN THE MAIL AND PREPARE AN INITIAL LISTING OF THE CHECKS RECEIVED AND LATER COMPARE THE LISTING TO THE RECEIPTS ISSUED. ALSO, VOUCHERS ARE PROCESSED, CHECKS PREPARED AND DISBURSEMENTS ARE RECORDED BY THE SAME PERSON. IN ADDITION, RECONCILING AND PREPARING OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ENTERING ADJUSTING JOURNAL ENTRIES ARE ALL DONE BY THE SAME PERSON.

Corrective Action Plan

WE WILL REVIEW PROCEDURES AND PLAN TO MAKE CHANGES TO IMPROVE INTERNAL CONTROL WHERE POSSIBLE.

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

$1,395,744 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2023 — management decision was due August 20, 2023.

2022-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2021-001

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? An independent person does not open the mail and prepare an initial listing of the checks received and later compare the listing to the receipts issued. Also, vouchers are processed, disbursements are recorded and checks are prepared by the same person. In addition, preparing and reconciling of financial reporting, and preparing and entering of adjusting journal entries are all done by the same person. Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Auditor?s Recommendation ? I realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response ? The district has made several process changes to improve the segregation of duties. Management continues to review procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Auditor?s Conclusion ? Response accepted.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? An independent person does not open the mail and prepare an initial listing of the checks received and later compare the listing to the receipts issued. Also, vouchers are processed, disbursements are recorded and checks are prepared by the same person. In addition, preparing and reconciling of financial reporting, and preparing and entering of adjusting journal entries are all done by the same person. Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Auditor?s Recommendation ? I realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response ? The district has made several process changes to improve the segregation of duties. Management continues to review procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Auditor?s Conclusion ? Response accepted.

Corrective Action Plan

We will review procedures and plan to make changes to improve internal control when possible.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Other →

FY 2021-06-30

$1,439,988 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2022 — management decision was due July 23, 2022.

2021-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? An independent person does not open the mail and prepare an initial listing of the checks received and later compare the listing to the receipts issued. Also, vouchers are processed, disbursements are recorded and checks are prepared by the same person. In addition, preparing and reconciling of financial reporting, and preparing and entering of adjusting journal entries are all done by the same person. Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Auditor?s Recommendation ? I realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response ? The district has made several process changes to improve the segregation of duties. Management continues to review procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Auditor?s Conclusion ? Response accepted.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? An independent person does not open the mail and prepare an initial listing of the checks received and later compare the listing to the receipts issued. Also, vouchers are processed, disbursements are recorded and checks are prepared by the same person. In addition, preparing and reconciling of financial reporting, and preparing and entering of adjusting journal entries are all done by the same person. Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Auditor?s Recommendation ? I realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response ? The district has made several process changes to improve the segregation of duties. Management continues to review procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Auditor?s Conclusion ? Response accepted.

Corrective Action Plan

We will review procedures and plan to make changes to improve internal control when possible.

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.