← Back to home

Riverside Community School DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 421403298

UEI: H24EJCMAFED9

Audited by: Schroer & Associates, PC

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

Riverside Community School District4 audit years4 findings3 repeat
4
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings
$791.9K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$791,903 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 6, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 6, 2025 (422 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2023-002

Lack of Segregation of Duties - See Report

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Lack of Segregation of Duties - See Report

Corrective Action Plan

We will continue to review our procedures and implement controls when possible

Prior Finding References

2023-002

About Other →

FY 2023-06-30

$784,780 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2024 — management decision was due July 5, 2024.

2023-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2022-002

Segregation of Duties

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties

Corrective Action Plan

Will continue to review our procedures and implement controls when possible

Prior Finding References

2022-002

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

$1,176,117 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 26, 2022 — management decision was due June 26, 2023.

2022-002
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2021-001

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? One individual may perform two or more functions in each of the following areas for the District. 1) Cash ? bank reconciliations, cash receipts, disbursements and approval functions 2) Inventories ? purchasing, recording and maintaining inventory records 3) Capital assets ? responsibility for assets and periodic testing 4) Receipts ? recording, depositing, posting and reconciling 5) Disbursements ? check preparation, signing checks, voucher preparation and reconciling disbursements to the check register 6) Payroll ? approval of and payment of payroll taxes, write checks, sign checks, and post payroll to the general ledger 7) Long-term debt ? maintain records and performs cash functions 8) Transfers ? authorization, recording and approval 9) Wire transfers ? processing and approving 10) Financial reporting ? preparing, reconciling and approving 11) Computer systems ? performing and controlling all general accounting functions 12) Journal entries ? posting and approval Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors, or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation ? We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response and Corrective Action Planned ? We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion - Response accepted.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? One individual may perform two or more functions in each of the following areas for the District. 1) Cash ? bank reconciliations, cash receipts, disbursements and approval functions 2) Inventories ? purchasing, recording and maintaining inventory records 3) Capital assets ? responsibility for assets and periodic testing 4) Receipts ? recording, depositing, posting and reconciling 5) Disbursements ? check preparation, signing checks, voucher preparation and reconciling disbursements to the check register 6) Payroll ? approval of and payment of payroll taxes, write checks, sign checks, and post payroll to the general ledger 7) Long-term debt ? maintain records and performs cash functions 8) Transfers ? authorization, recording and approval 9) Wire transfers ? processing and approving 10) Financial reporting ? preparing, reconciling and approving 11) Computer systems ? performing and controlling all general accounting functions 12) Journal entries ? posting and approval Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors, or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation ? We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response and Corrective Action Planned ? We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion - Response accepted.

Corrective Action Plan

We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Other →

FY 2021-06-30

$1,278,735 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 3, 2022 — management decision was due July 3, 2022.

2021-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? One individual may perform two or more functions in each of the following areas for the District. 1) Cash ? bank reconciliations, cash receipts, disbursements and approval functions 2) Inventories ? purchasing, recording and maintaining inventory records 3) Capital assets ? responsibility for assets and periodic testing 4) Receipts ? recording, depositing, posting and reconciling 5) Disbursements ? check preparation, signing checks, voucher preparation and reconciling disbursements to the check register 6) Payroll ? approval of and payment of payroll taxes, write checks, sign checks, and post payroll to the general ledger 7) Long-term debt ? maintain records and performs cash functions 8) Transfers ? authorization, recording and approval 9) Wire transfers ? processing and approving 10) Financial reporting ? preparing, reconciling and approving 11) Computer systems ? performing and controlling all general accounting functions 12) Journal entries ? posting and approval Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors, or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation ? We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response and Corrective Action Planned ? We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion - Response accepted.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Segregation of Duties Criteria ? Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. A good system of internal control provides for adequate segregation of duties so no one individual handles a transaction from its inception to completion. In order to maintain proper internal control, duties should be segregated so the authorization, custody and recording of transactions are not under the control of the same employee. This segregation of duties helps prevent losses from employee error or dishonesty and maximizes the accuracy of the District?s financial statements. Condition ? One individual may perform two or more functions in each of the following areas for the District. 1) Cash ? bank reconciliations, cash receipts, disbursements and approval functions 2) Inventories ? purchasing, recording and maintaining inventory records 3) Capital assets ? responsibility for assets and periodic testing 4) Receipts ? recording, depositing, posting and reconciling 5) Disbursements ? check preparation, signing checks, voucher preparation and reconciling disbursements to the check register 6) Payroll ? approval of and payment of payroll taxes, write checks, sign checks, and post payroll to the general ledger 7) Long-term debt ? maintain records and performs cash functions 8) Transfers ? authorization, recording and approval 9) Wire transfers ? processing and approving 10) Financial reporting ? preparing, reconciling and approving 11) Computer systems ? performing and controlling all general accounting functions 12) Journal entries ? posting and approval Cause ? The District has a limited number of employees and procedures have not been designed to adequately segregate duties or provide compensating controls through additional oversight of transactions and processes. Effect ? Inadequate segregation of duties could adversely affect the District?s ability to prevent or detect and correct misstatements, errors, or misappropriation on a timely basis by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. Recommendation ? We realize segregation of duties is difficult with a limited number of office employees. However, the District should review its procedures to obtain the maximum internal control possible under the circumstances utilizing currently available staff, including elected officials. Response and Corrective Action Planned ? We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible. Conclusion - Response accepted.

Corrective Action Plan

We will continue to review our procedures and implement additional controls where possible.

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.