EIN: 421263416
UEI: FKBVAZYFAYE3
Audited by: Shipley CPA, LLC
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 7, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on April 14, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 14, 2026 (31 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2024 — management decision was due June 18, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2022 — management decision was due September 29, 2022.
There is a lack of segregation of duties among the Organization?s personnel as well as lack of visible approval of transactions. Journal entries are not being reviewed. Questioned Costs: None were noted. Context: No visible sign of review or approval on the bank reconciliations, journal entries or other transactions. Cause: There are a limited number of personnel for certain functions. Effect: Transactions could be mishandled. Recommendations: I recommend that the Organization set up processes and procedures to ensure an adequate segregation of duties occurs and that bank reconciliations are prepared monthly and those bank reconciliations as well as any journal entries prepared are reviewed and visible approval is noted. Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): This audit was a review of financials from previous management agent. However, the new management company has a system to ensure that all monthly financials are reviewed and approved. There are designated positions assigned to ensure financials are reviewed and approved.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Duties should be segregated to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are handled appropriately. Condition: There is a lack of segregation of duties among the Organization?s personnel as well as lack of visible approval of transactions. Journal entries are not being reviewed. Questioned Costs: None were noted. Context: No visible sign of review or approval on the bank reconciliations, journal entries or other transactions. Cause: There are a limited number of personnel for certain functions. Effect: Transactions could be mishandled. Recommendations: I recommend that the Organization set up processes and procedures to ensure an adequate segregation of duties occurs and that bank reconciliations are prepared monthly and those bank reconciliations as well as any journal entries prepared are reviewed and visible approval is noted. Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): This audit was a review of financials from previous management agent. However, the new management company has a system to ensure that all monthly financials are reviewed and approved. There are designated positions assigned to ensure financials are reviewed and approved.
Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): This audit was a review of financials from previous management agent. However, the new management company has a system to ensure that all monthly financials are reviewed and approved. There are designated positions assigned to ensure financials are reviewed and approved.
There is a lack of proper financial statement closing procedures being done by the Organization. Questioned Costs: None were noted. Context: Significant and material adjusting journal entries were made in the current period, in order to present materially correct financial statements. Cause: Bank reconciliations were not performed in a timely manner; transactions were coded incorrectly during the period. Effect: Transactions could be mishandled, and financial information could be unreliable. Recommendations: I recommend that the Organization set up processes and procedures to ensure reconciliations are prepared monthly, and subsidiary ledgers are reconciled monthly as well. Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): This audit was review of financials from previous management agent. Current management agent has financials reconciled monthly and board approval.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria: Proper financial statement closing procedures should be done monthly and on an annual basis. Balance sheet accounts should be reconciled to the subsidiary ledger and the appropriate statements. Condition: There is a lack of proper financial statement closing procedures being done by the Organization. Questioned Costs: None were noted. Context: Significant and material adjusting journal entries were made in the current period, in order to present materially correct financial statements. Cause: Bank reconciliations were not performed in a timely manner; transactions were coded incorrectly during the period. Effect: Transactions could be mishandled, and financial information could be unreliable. Recommendations: I recommend that the Organization set up processes and procedures to ensure reconciliations are prepared monthly, and subsidiary ledgers are reconciled monthly as well. Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): This audit was review of financials from previous management agent. Current management agent has financials reconciled monthly and board approval.
Views of Responsible Officials (Unaudited): This audit was review of financials from previous management agent. Current management agent has financials reconciled monthly and board approval.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Kansas →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
