← Back to home

Southeast Iowa Regional Housing AuthorityLocal Government

EIN: 421149531

UEI: XXU6Y64NCGA5

Audited by: 470812943

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Southeast Iowa Regional Housing Authority8 audit years2 findings1 repeat
8
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,153,648 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 6, 2026 (32 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Eligibility / Reporting / Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2024-003

The Authority consists of limited employees and as a result does not have personnel assigned responsibilities in such a way that different employees handle different parts of the compliance requirements. The lack of segregation of duties applies to all the compliance requirements of the Voucher program and we noted other specific areas of noncompliance: • HQS Quality Control – The Authority must perform a unit inspection in the Section 8 program and also conduct quality control re-inspections. During our audit we noted the Authority has a separate inspector and then the Director does the re-inspection. The Authority implemented a control log to document the units and respective dates of the inspections, however there is no documentation beyond this of the re-inspection performed. The Authority should complete and document the re-inspection checklist so this can be confirmed as part of the audit. Cause: The Authority has limited staff and does not have the resources to properly segregate duties in relation to various compliance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: The lack of segregation of duties related to the controls over the categories above are significant deficiencies that result in material noncompliance will not be prevented or detected In addition, the Authority has not properly implemented HQS requirements. Recommendation: The Authority should review its controls over processes to determine which controls could be implemented in order to achieve a segregation of duties. The Authority should determine and document its internal control components and procedures to prevent noncompliance with federal program requirements. The Authority is able to implement an adequate control over the HQS Quality Controls and should review its process for this compliance requirement. View of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the Finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2025-003: Internal Controls – Activities/Allowable Costs/Eligibility/Reporting/Special Tests and Provisions Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Cluster Program, Assistance Listing #14.871 Material Weakness/Noncompliance Criteria: A properly designed internal control structure relies greatly on a proper segregation of duties between several individuals. In the ideal situation, duties related to program compliance would be segregated so that an instance of material noncompliance would be prevented or detected. Condition: The Authority consists of limited employees and as a result does not have personnel assigned responsibilities in such a way that different employees handle different parts of the compliance requirements. The lack of segregation of duties applies to all the compliance requirements of the Voucher program and we noted other specific areas of noncompliance: • HQS Quality Control – The Authority must perform a unit inspection in the Section 8 program and also conduct quality control re-inspections. During our audit we noted the Authority has a separate inspector and then the Director does the re-inspection. The Authority implemented a control log to document the units and respective dates of the inspections, however there is no documentation beyond this of the re-inspection performed. The Authority should complete and document the re-inspection checklist so this can be confirmed as part of the audit. Cause: The Authority has limited staff and does not have the resources to properly segregate duties in relation to various compliance requirements. Effect or Potential Effect: The lack of segregation of duties related to the controls over the categories above are significant deficiencies that result in material noncompliance will not be prevented or detected In addition, the Authority has not properly implemented HQS requirements. Recommendation: The Authority should review its controls over processes to determine which controls could be implemented in order to achieve a segregation of duties. The Authority should determine and document its internal control components and procedures to prevent noncompliance with federal program requirements. The Authority is able to implement an adequate control over the HQS Quality Controls and should review its process for this compliance requirement. View of Responsible Official: Management agrees with the Finding.

Corrective Action Plan

HQS inspections will be documented in each tenant’s file in accordance with applicable standards, along with the corresponding inspection log maintained by the PHA. Any required reinspection will also be completed and documented accordingly in the tenant’s file.

Prior Finding References

2024-003

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Eligibility, Reporting, Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,149,609 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2025 — management decision was due August 6, 2025.

2024-003
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

X

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

X

Corrective Action Plan

A HUD Depository agreement was not filed with our financial institution, the director has sent that to the financial institution to sign and will file that properly.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

$1,028,007 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$942,123 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 28, 2020 — management decision was due June 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$923,099 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$852,753 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2019 — management decision was due September 20, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$884,712 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 12, 2018 — management decision was due September 12, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$827,165 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 18, 2016 — management decision was due June 18, 2017.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.