← Back to home

METHODIST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITYNon-Profit

EIN: 420837578

UEI: SZ4ZD41LG6D3

Audited by: Williams & Company, P.C.

Oversight agency: 10 [Department of Agriculture]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

METHODIST MANOR RETIREMENT COMMUNITY8 audit years11 findings2 repeat
8
Audit Years
11
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$27.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$27,681,548 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 22, 2026 (112 days from today).

What is a management decision? →
2025-003
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist. Conclusion: Response accepted.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-004
Special Tests & Provisions
OTHER MATTERS

During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31- 2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2025, 6/30/2025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2025, 6/30/2025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods. Conclusion: Response accepted.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-005
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for depositing $10,343 into a separate general ledger account every month to fund the restricted debt service reserve and they must obtain permission before using the funds. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the funds were not deposited for several of the required months and the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account to separate the required funds, and have a review process to verify that the deposits were made properly. Client Response: The Organization has automated a reoccurring ACH that deposits $10,343 into the reserve account every month and funded the balance to the required amount. The bookkeeping company and management have added a reserve account review to their monthly checklist. Conclusion: Response accepted.

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-006
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31- 2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2025, 6/30/2025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: The Organization is responsible for sending the following reports to the USDA: FYE 12-31-2024 Audit, FY 2026 Budget, Quarterly reports for 3/30/2026, 6/30/2 025, and 9/30/2025, and Certification of Insurance. Condition: During our review of compliance with the Community Facilities Loans & Grants, we identified that the required reports were not sent to the USDA. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight by management. Effect: As a result the agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should create a checklist to track/remind management to send the required reports to the USDA as well create a monthly electronic calendar reminder Client Response: The facility has submitted the required reports and added items to their monthly checklist and calendar for future reporting periods. Conclusion: Response accepted.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2024-12-31

$27,977,840 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 13, 2025 — management decision was due January 13, 2026.

FY 2023-12-31

$28,050,264 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 17, 2024 — management decision was due December 17, 2024.

2023-002
Other
OTHER MATTERS

During our review of compliance requirements for the Community Facilities Loans & Grants Cluster, we identified the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight of management. Potential Effect: As a result, the Agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account for debt service reserve. Client Response: The Organization has setup a separate general ledger account.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The debt service reserve should have a separate general ledger account. Condition: During our review of compliance requirements for the Community Facilities Loans & Grants Cluster, we identified the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight of management. Potential Effect: As a result, the Agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account for debt service reserve. Client Response: The Organization has setup a separate general ledger account.

Corrective Action Plan

Compliance Reporting – Reserve Funds Criteria: The debt service reserve should have a separate general ledger account. Condition: During our review of compliance requirements for the Community Facilities Loans & Grants Cluster, we identified the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight of management. Potential Effect: As a result, the Agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account for debt service reserve. Client Response: The Organization has setup a separate general ledger account. Conclusion: Response accepted.

About Other →
2023-003
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our review of compliance requirements for the Community Facilities Loans & Grants Cluster, we identified the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight of management. Potential Effect: As a result, the Agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account for debt service reserve. Client Response: The Organization has setup a separate general ledger account.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The debt service reserve should have a separate general ledger account. Condition: During our review of compliance requirements for the Community Facilities Loans & Grants Cluster, we identified the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight of management. Potential Effect: As a result, the Agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account for debt service reserve. Client Response: The Organization has setup a separate general ledger account.

Corrective Action Plan

Compliance Reporting — Reserve Funds Criteria: The debt service reserve should have a separate general ledger account. Condition: During our review of compliance requirements for the Community Facilities Loans & Grants C luster, we identified the funds were not in a separate general ledger account. Cause: The requirement was not met due to an oversight of management. Potential Effect: As a result, the Agency reserves the right to withdraw Agency funding. Recommendation: The Organization should setup a separate general ledger account for debt service reserve. C lient Response: The Organization has setup a separate general ledger account. Conclusion: Response accepted.

About Other →

FY 2022-12-31

GOING CONCERN$28,215,138 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 20, 2023 — management decision was due January 20, 2024.

FY 2021-12-31

GOING CONCERN$908,994 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2023 — management decision was due July 15, 2023.

2021-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During our review of internal control procedures over expenses reported to the Provider Relief Fund Oversight Agency, we identified a lack of review and segregation of duties where management review was not present in the control environment. Cause: Review procedures were not performed to ensure the allowable expenses reported were eligible to be used towards the use of Provider Relief Funds. Effect: As a result, there could be an un-allowed expense applied to the use of the Provider Relief Funds. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization should implement review procedures to ensure the expenses and lost revenues identified are accurate and eligible for reimbursement by Provider Relief Funds. Client Response: Nick Landgraf will review invoices for proper payment and allowable under Provider Relief eligibility requirements as his signature is applied to all checks. A board member or member of the Management company will review the information in the PRF reporting portal and authorize future submissions.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: Management is responsible for maintaining proper controls over the expenses reported semi-annually in the Provider Relief Funds reporting portal. Condition: During our review of internal control procedures over expenses reported to the Provider Relief Fund Oversight Agency, we identified a lack of review and segregation of duties where management review was not present in the control environment. Cause: Review procedures were not performed to ensure the allowable expenses reported were eligible to be used towards the use of Provider Relief Funds. Effect: As a result, there could be an un-allowed expense applied to the use of the Provider Relief Funds. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization should implement review procedures to ensure the expenses and lost revenues identified are accurate and eligible for reimbursement by Provider Relief Funds. Client Response: Nick Landgraf will review invoices for proper payment and allowable under Provider Relief eligibility requirements as his signature is applied to all checks. A board member or member of the Management company will review the information in the PRF reporting portal and authorize future submissions.

Corrective Action Plan

Criteria: Management is responsible for maintaining proper controls over the expenses reported semi-annually in the Provider Relief Funds reporting portal. Condition: During our review of internal control procedures over expenses reported to the Provider Relief Fund Oversight Agency, we identified a lack of review and segregation of duties where management review was not present in the control environment. Cause: Review procedures were not performed to ensure the allowable expenses reported were eligible to be used towards the use of Provider Relief Funds. Effect: As a result, there could be an unallowed expense applied to the use of the Provider Relief Funds. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization should implement review procedures to ensure the expenses and lost revenues identified are accurate and eligible for reimbursement by Provider Relief Funds. Client Response: Nick Landgraf will review invoices for proper payment and allowable under Provider Relief eligibility requirements as his signature is applied to all checks. A board member or member of the Management company will review the information in the PRF reporting portal and authorize future submissions.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,460,044 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 8, 2019 — management decision was due January 8, 2020.

2018-004
Reporting
REPEAT OF 2017-004OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-004

About Reporting →
2018-005
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2017-005OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-005

About Reporting →

FY 2017-12-31

$16,366,681 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2018 — management decision was due April 17, 2019.

2017-004
Reporting
MODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2017-005
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-12-31

$2,227,835 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 31, 2017 — management decision was due March 3, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.