← Back to home

WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITYHigher Education

EIN: 420707120

UEI: XL2LT5DKJCY1

Audited by: FORGE FINANCIAL AND MANAGEMENT CONSULTING

Cognizant agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

WILLIAM PENN UNIVERSITY10 audit years1 findings
10
Audit Years
1
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$50.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$50,945,457 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 19, 2026 (76 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,064,840 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 12, 2024 — management decision was due May 12, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,837,483 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 5, 2024 — management decision was due July 5, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

$15,047,151 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 10, 2022 — management decision was due May 10, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$14,031,083 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 3, 2021 — management decision was due May 3, 2022.

2021-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Out of a sample of 40 students, we identified one error in awarding for one student. The error was not identified by the University?s monitoring procedures over student files. Context: One student was over awarded an incorrect SEOG allocation (was entitled to $250 but received $500). Cause: The University?s monitoring procedures did not identify the error or maintain the required documentation for the student files noted. Effect: Error was made in awards made to students and not detected. The error was not material to the federal program. Recommendation: We suggest the University implement a more detailed review of student files to ensure all documentation is included and awards are calculated correctly based on the student?s financial information. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The University will implement a more detailed review of the student files to ensure all awards are properly issued based on correct criteria.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding 2021-001 ? Review of Student Files and Awarding Procedures Criteria and Condition: Out of a sample of 40 students, we identified one error in awarding for one student. The error was not identified by the University?s monitoring procedures over student files. Context: One student was over awarded an incorrect SEOG allocation (was entitled to $250 but received $500). Cause: The University?s monitoring procedures did not identify the error or maintain the required documentation for the student files noted. Effect: Error was made in awards made to students and not detected. The error was not material to the federal program. Recommendation: We suggest the University implement a more detailed review of student files to ensure all documentation is included and awards are calculated correctly based on the student?s financial information. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The University will implement a more detailed review of the student files to ensure all awards are properly issued based on correct criteria.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding 202 1-001 ? Review of Student Files and Awarding Procedures Recommendation: We suggest the University implement a more detailed review of student files to ensure all documentation is included and awards are calculated correctly based on the student's financial information. Action Taken: The University will implement a more detailed review of the student files to ensure all awards are properly issued based on correct criteria. Anticipated Completion Date: June 30, 2022

About Other →

FY 2020-06-30

$13,208,134 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 28, 2021 — management decision was due September 28, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$12,028,503 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$13,093,932 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 21, 2019 — management decision was due July 21, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,297,039 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 18, 2018 — management decision was due September 18, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$14,560,742 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 22, 2017 — management decision was due August 22, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Iowa

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.