EIN: 416005444
UEI: DFLCVDJ91TM7
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 24, 2026 (165 days ago).
What is a management decision? →There is a lack of an official procurement, suspension and debarment policy as required by Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the City does not have a Uniform Grant Guidance Procurement Policy designating controls of procurement, suspension & debarment procedures. Cause: Oversight Effect: There is potential for vendors to be paid with federal dollars without receiving proper approval or while being federally suspended. Repeat Finding: Yes, See Finding 2023-002. Recommendation: We recommend the City adopt a Procurement Policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Lack of Procurement Policy – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City is required to have controls in place to ensure vendors are not federally suspended or debarred prior to payment. Condition: There is a lack of an official procurement, suspension and debarment policy as required by Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the City does not have a Uniform Grant Guidance Procurement Policy designating controls of procurement, suspension & debarment procedures. Cause: Oversight Effect: There is potential for vendors to be paid with federal dollars without receiving proper approval or while being federally suspended. Repeat Finding: Yes, See Finding 2023-002. Recommendation: We recommend the City adopt a Procurement Policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Lack of Procurement Policy – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: December 31, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend the City adopt a procurement policy that includes procedures over suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The City will prepare a policy and have it adopted by the City Council. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Emily Burns, Finance Manager Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: December 31, 2025.
2023-002
FAC accepted this audit on July 11, 2024 — management decision was due January 11, 2025.
There is a lack of an official procurement, suspension and debarment policy as required by Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the City does not have a Uniform Grant Guidance Procurement Policy designating controls of procurement, suspension & debarment procedures. Cause: Oversight Effect: There is potential for vendors to be paid with federal dollars without receiving proper approval or while being federally suspended. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the City adopt a Procurement Policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Finding: 2023-002 Lack of Procurement Policy – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: December 31, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The City is required to have controls in place to ensure vendors are not federally suspended or debarred prior to payment. Condition: There is a lack of an official procurement, suspension and debarment policy as required by Uniform Grant Guidance. Questioned Costs: None Context: During testing, it was noted that the City does not have a Uniform Grant Guidance Procurement Policy designating controls of procurement, suspension & debarment procedures. Cause: Oversight Effect: There is potential for vendors to be paid with federal dollars without receiving proper approval or while being federally suspended. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the City adopt a Procurement Policy in line with Uniform Grant Guidance. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Finding: 2023-002 Lack of Procurement Policy – Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Title: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: N/A Pass-Through Agency: N/A Pass-Through Number(s): N/A Award Period: December 31, 2023 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend the City adopt a procurement policy that includes procedures over suspension and debarment. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The City will prepare a policy and have it adopted by the City Council. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Rhonda Moen, Finance Manager Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: December 31, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on July 5, 2023 — management decision was due January 5, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on August 2, 2022 — management decision was due February 2, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 22, 2021 — management decision was due December 22, 2021.
The required monthly reports submitted to the state were not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Questioned costs: None Context: The City was required to submit monthly reports to the state. The City submitted a total of four reports. None of the four reports were properly reviewed before they were submitted to the state. Cause: City management had someone reviewing the actual expenditures, but did not review the final report submissions to the state. Effect: The amounts reported on the monthly reports could be incorrect and there is an increased change that the City would not catch the error internally. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend City management has a secondary person reviewing these reports before they are submitted to the state. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2020 ? 001 Federal agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal program title: Coronavirus Relief Fund CFDA Number: 21.019 Pass-Through Agency: State of Minnesota Pass-Through Number(s): SLT0016 Award Period: March 1, 2020 ? November 15, 2020 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or specific requirement: Standard internal control procedures suggest that reports should have a review documented by someone other than the preparer. Condition: The required monthly reports submitted to the state were not reviewed by someone other than the preparer. Questioned costs: None Context: The City was required to submit monthly reports to the state. The City submitted a total of four reports. None of the four reports were properly reviewed before they were submitted to the state. Cause: City management had someone reviewing the actual expenditures, but did not review the final report submissions to the state. Effect: The amounts reported on the monthly reports could be incorrect and there is an increased change that the City would not catch the error internally. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend City management has a secondary person reviewing these reports before they are submitted to the state. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
2020-001 TIMELY REPORTING Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Title: Coronavirus Relief Fund CFDA Number: 20.019 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Management and Budget Pass-Through Number: STL0016 Compliance Requirement Affected: Reporting Award Period: Year-Ended December 31, 2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Other Matters Recommendation: We recommend City management has a secondary person reviewing these reports before they are submitted to the state. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The City will review procedures and implement changes as needed to ensure proper review of reports before final submission. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action plan: Rhonda Moen, Finance Director Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 31, 2021
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.