← Back to home

Owatonna Public Schools #761Local Government

EIN: 416004063

UEI: LZ84MHKRJEY5

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Owatonna Public Schools #76110 audit years11 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
11
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$5.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,061,420 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 30, 2026 (65 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,097,430 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2024 — management decision was due June 10, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,578,359 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 23, 2023 — management decision was due June 23, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,055,964 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 27, 2022 — management decision was due May 27, 2023.

2022-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing, we noted that the District did not complete one of the two Financial Reporting Forms by the deadline. Instead, an annual, comprehensive Financial Reporting Form was submitted by the end of year deadline. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the District only submitted one of the two required reports related to the grant. Cause: The related staff that would be involved with the preparation of the report were out of the office around the due date due to COVID-19. Effect: Lack of proper procedures and controls related to grant reporting could result in reports not being filed timely or in inaccurate reports being submitted to the grantor. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls in relation to the required Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, to ensure they are completed accurately and timely going forward. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022 ? 001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619 - 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 ? Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Award requires compliance with the provisions of reporting. The District should have internal controls designed to ensure compliance with those provisions. Condition: During our testing, we noted that the District did not complete one of the two Financial Reporting Forms by the deadline. Instead, an annual, comprehensive Financial Reporting Form was submitted by the end of year deadline. Questioned Costs: None Context: During our testing, it was noted that the District only submitted one of the two required reports related to the grant. Cause: The related staff that would be involved with the preparation of the report were out of the office around the due date due to COVID-19. Effect: Lack of proper procedures and controls related to grant reporting could result in reports not being filed timely or in inaccurate reports being submitted to the grantor. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls in relation to the required Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, to ensure they are completed accurately and timely going forward. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2022 ? 001 Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Name: Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRP2619 - 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): Unknown Award Period: July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 ? Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls in relation to the required Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds, to ensure they are completed accurately and timely going forward. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action Taken in Response to Finding: The District will implement procedures and controls over federal funds to ensure all requirements have been met. Name of the Contact Person Responsible for Corrective Action Plan: Amanda Heilman, Director of Finance and Operations Planned Completion Date for Corrective Action Plan: June 30, 2023

About Reporting →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,371,020 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2021 — management decision was due June 5, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,932,349 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2021 — management decision was due July 20, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$4,070,635 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-001

Noted during testing of suspension and debarment that there was no formal documentation that a check was performed to ensure that a vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a contract. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The issue was noted with one of the two contracts tested for suspension and debarment in relation to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause: The District did not formally document that it confirmed the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a contract with the vendor. Effect: The District could enter into a contracts with suspended and debarred vendors. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: CLA recommends the District puts in place the proper procedures to check suspension and debarment for vendors prior to working with them. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2019-001 ? Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Pass Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pass Through Number: 1-0761-000-000 Award Periods: Year ended June 30, 2019 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Finding Criteria: The District should have procedures in place to ensure that it verifies that an entity with which it plans to enter into a covered transaction and any of its principals are not debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from participating in such as transaction. Condition: Noted during testing of suspension and debarment that there was no formal documentation that a check was performed to ensure that a vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a contract. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: The issue was noted with one of the two contracts tested for suspension and debarment in relation to the Child Nutrition Cluster. Cause: The District did not formally document that it confirmed the vendor was not suspended or debarred prior to entering into a contract with the vendor. Effect: The District could enter into a contracts with suspended and debarred vendors. Repeat Finding: Yes. Recommendation: CLA recommends the District puts in place the proper procedures to check suspension and debarment for vendors prior to working with them. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2019 ? 001: Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal program title: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Agriculture Award Period: July 1, 2018 ? June 30, 2019 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Finding Recommendation: It is recommended the District puts in place the proper procedures to check suspension and debarment for vendors prior to working with them. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There i s no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions planned in response to finding: The District will check vendors for suspension and debarment on the SAM website prior to purchasing or contracting with the vendor by reviewing end of year vendor purchases i n excess of the suspension and debarment threshold and performing a check on the SAM website prior to purchasing for the subsequent fiscal year. The District will additionally add a suspension and debarment check procedure to the district?s contracting process. Responsible party: The District?s Director of Finance and Operations, the Controller, and the Director of Nutrition Services. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2020. Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: The school board will monitor the completion of this corrective action plan.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Reporting →
2019-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing, it was noted that the District did not retain quotes or document its considerations of open competition for a procurement over the micro-purchase threshold before the related contract was awarded. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Of a sample of 5 general procurement transactions which we tested, we noted 1 for which the District did not retain quotes or document its considerations of open competition. Cause: The District did not have the controls and procedures in place to ensure the proper documentation of its procurement and open competitions considerations related to the underlying procurement. Effect: A lack of proper documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Lack of an updated policy could lead to improper procedures and selections related to how procurements are selected and awarded Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: It is recommended that the District creates some sort of standard procedure or form that indicates what method is being used to track all procured items over the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) to help formally document of how open competition is being assessed. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2019-002 ? Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, and 10.559 Pass Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Agriculture Pass Through Number: 1-0761-000-000 Award Periods: Year ended June 30, 2019 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Finding Criteria: ?200.319 requires that all procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the District did not retain quotes or document its considerations of open competition for a procurement over the micro-purchase threshold before the related contract was awarded. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: Of a sample of 5 general procurement transactions which we tested, we noted 1 for which the District did not retain quotes or document its considerations of open competition. Cause: The District did not have the controls and procedures in place to ensure the proper documentation of its procurement and open competitions considerations related to the underlying procurement. Effect: A lack of proper documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Lack of an updated policy could lead to improper procedures and selections related to how procurements are selected and awarded Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: It is recommended that the District creates some sort of standard procedure or form that indicates what method is being used to track all procured items over the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) to help formally document of how open competition is being assessed. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2019 ? 002: Procurement Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal program title: Child Nutrition Cluster CFDA Numbers: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Agriculture Award Period: July 1, 2018 ? June 30, 2019 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Finding Recommendation: It i s recommended that the District creates some sort of standard procedure or form that i ndicates what method i s being used to track all procured i tems over the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) to help formally document of how open competition is being assessed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There i s no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions planned in response to finding: The District will develop a form that i ndicates what method i s being used to track all procured i tems over the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) to help formally document of how open competition is being assessed. Responsible party: The District?s Director of Finance and Operations, the Controller, and the Director of Nutrition Services. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2019. Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: The school board will monitor the completion of this corrective action plan.

About Reporting →
2019-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our testing, it was noted that the District did not retain quotes or document its considerations of open competition for a procurement over the micro-purchase threshold before the related contract was awarded. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There was one applicable procurement coded to the special education cluster. The issue was noted with this one, applicable procurement. Cause: The District did not have the controls and procedures in place to ensure the proper documentation of its procurement and open competitions considerations related to the underlying procurement. Effect: A lack of proper documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Lack of an updated policy could lead to improper procedures and selections related to how procurements are selected and awarded. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: It is recommended that the District creates some sort of standard procedure or form that indicates what method is being used to track all procured items over the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) to help formally document of how open competition is being assessed. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding Number: 2019-003 ? Procurement Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program: Special Education Cluster CFDA Numbers: 84.027 and 84.173 Pass Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass Through Number: 1-0761-000-000 Award Periods: Year ended June 30, 2019 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Noncompliance Finding Criteria: ?200.319 requires that all procurement transactions must be conducted in a manner providing full and open competition consistent with the standards of this section. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, or invitations for bids or requests for proposals must be excluded from competing for such procurements. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the District did not retain quotes or document its considerations of open competition for a procurement over the micro-purchase threshold before the related contract was awarded. Questioned Costs: None noted. Context: There was one applicable procurement coded to the special education cluster. The issue was noted with this one, applicable procurement. Cause: The District did not have the controls and procedures in place to ensure the proper documentation of its procurement and open competitions considerations related to the underlying procurement. Effect: A lack of proper documentation could lead to using vendors for small purchase acquisitions without ensuring comparable pricing from other vendors and justifying costs. Lack of an updated policy could lead to improper procedures and selections related to how procurements are selected and awarded. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: It is recommended that the District creates some sort of standard procedure or form that indicates what method is being used to track all procured items over the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) to help formally document of how open competition is being assessed. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2019 ? 003: Procurement Federal agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal program title: Special Education Cluster CFDA Numbers: 84.027 and 84.173 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Award Period: July 1, 2018 ? June 30, 2019 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Finding Recommendation: It is recommended that the District creates some sort of standard procedure or form that i ndicates what method i s being used to track all procured i tems over the micro-purchase threshold ($10,000) to help formally document of how open competition is being assessed. Views of responsible officials and planned corrective actions: Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There i s no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions planned in response to finding: The District will only record payroll and benefits to the federal Special Education cluster grants. Responsible party: The District?s Director of Finance and Operations, the Controller, and the Director of Special Services. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2019. Plan to monitor completion of corrective action plan: The school board will monitor the completion of this corrective action plan.

About Reporting →

FY 2018-06-30

GOING CONCERN$4,218,002 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2018 — management decision was due June 16, 2019.

2018-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2018-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2018-003
Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Matching, Level of Effort, Earmarking →

FY 2017-06-30

$3,604,646 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2017 — management decision was due June 30, 2018.

2017-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2016-06-30

$3,355,650 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 27, 2016 — management decision was due May 27, 2017.

2016-001
Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2015-001QUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-001

About Reporting →
2016-002
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →
2016-003
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.