← Back to home

Waconia Public Schools ISD #110Local Government

EIN: 416000476

UEI: QH3QH134KAT9

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Waconia Public Schools ISD #11010 audit years3 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,660,958 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 20, 2026 (21 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,183,186 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 17, 2024 — management decision was due June 17, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$2,404,425 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 12, 2024 — management decision was due July 12, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$6,323,603 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2022 — management decision was due June 11, 2023.

2022-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2021-003OTHER MATTERS

During procurement testing, it was noted that 2 of 2 vendors tested did not go through proper procurement procedures. During suspension and debarment testing, it was noted that the review process was not operating effectively. There was no support for review of certification regarding debarment, suspension, and responsibility for 5 of 5 vendors tested. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: 2 of 2 vendors tested did not go through proper procurement procedures and 5 of 5 vendors tested did not have proper evidence of review to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Oversight and turnover. Effect: Lack of proper documentation of controls over compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment requirements could result in paying suspended or debarred vendors. This could ultimately result in questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes ? Finding 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are being followed and vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the finding and there is a corrective action plan in place.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-003 ? Procurement/Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 222MN061N1199 - 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 1-0110-000 Award Period: July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CRF section 180.995, the District is required to have a policy in place to ensure entities are properly procuring goods and services and to review vendors showing they are not excluded or debarred for participating in procurement transactions that use federal funds. Condition: During procurement testing, it was noted that 2 of 2 vendors tested did not go through proper procurement procedures. During suspension and debarment testing, it was noted that the review process was not operating effectively. There was no support for review of certification regarding debarment, suspension, and responsibility for 5 of 5 vendors tested. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: 2 of 2 vendors tested did not go through proper procurement procedures and 5 of 5 vendors tested did not have proper evidence of review to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Oversight and turnover. Effect: Lack of proper documentation of controls over compliance with procurement and suspension and debarment requirements could result in paying suspended or debarred vendors. This could ultimately result in questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Yes ? Finding 2021-003 Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are being followed and vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the finding and there is a corrective action plan in place.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-003 ? Procurement/Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal Program Title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: 222MN061N1199 - 2022 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 1-0110-000 Award Period: July 1, 2021 - June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: ? Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance and Compliance CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP): Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are being followed and vendors are not suspended or debarred. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to the Finding: The District will continue to work on establishing procedures and controls to ensure proper procurement procedures are being followed and vendors are not suspended or debarred. Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Ra Chhoth, Director of Finance and Operations. Planned Completion Date for CAP: June 30, 2023.

Prior Finding References

2021-003

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$5,064,979 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 16, 2021 — management decision was due June 16, 2022.

2021-002
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During cash management testing, it was noted that the review process over the CLiCS reports was not operating effectively. There were errors in 3 of the 10 months submitted. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: 3 of 10 months of claim reimbursements were incorrectly filled out and submitted. They were not detected by the reviewer until after the third report of the year was submitted. Cause: The reviewer in the process was not able to review the reports timely and didn?t catch the error immediately. There was not a back up process to ensure another reviewer looked at the reports before they were submitted. Effect: Lack of proper controls over compliance with cash management requirement could result in errors or intentional misrepresentation of the meal counts being reported. This could ultimately result in questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure the CLiCS meal counts are accurate before submitting. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the finding and there is a corrective action plan in place.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-002 ? Cash Management Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal program title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 1-0110-000 Award Period: July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Material weakness in internal control over compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The District should have controls in place to ensure the accuracy of all cash management draws for the District?s Child Nutrition Cluster program, made via the reporting of meal counts in CLiCS. These controls should be formally documented to ensure they have been properly implemented. Condition: During cash management testing, it was noted that the review process over the CLiCS reports was not operating effectively. There were errors in 3 of the 10 months submitted. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: 3 of 10 months of claim reimbursements were incorrectly filled out and submitted. They were not detected by the reviewer until after the third report of the year was submitted. Cause: The reviewer in the process was not able to review the reports timely and didn?t catch the error immediately. There was not a back up process to ensure another reviewer looked at the reports before they were submitted. Effect: Lack of proper controls over compliance with cash management requirement could result in errors or intentional misrepresentation of the meal counts being reported. This could ultimately result in questioned costs. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure the CLiCS meal counts are accurate before submitting. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the finding and there is a corrective action plan in place.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-002 ? Cash Management Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal program title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 1-0110-000 Award Period: July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Material weakness in internal control over compliance CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP): Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure the CLiCS meal counts are reviewed and accurate before submitting. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to the Finding: The District will continue to work on establishing a process to ensure all CLiCS meal counts are accurate before submitting. Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Todd Swanson, Director of Finance and Operations. Planned Completion Date for CAP: June 30, 2022.

About Cash Management →
2021-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

During suspension and debarment testing, it was noted that the review process was not operating effectively. There was no support provided that 4 of the 5 vendors tested were reviewed for suspension and debarment. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: 4 of 5 vendors tested had no formal review to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Oversight. Effect: Lack of proper documentation of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in paying suspended or debarred vendors. This could ultimately result in questioned costs. During testing, it was noted that there were no issues with the actual vendors used by the District. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the finding and there is a corrective action plan in place.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-003 ? Suspension and Debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal program title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 1-0110-000 Award Period: July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Material weakness in internal control over compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The District should have controls in place to review vendors to ensure they are not excluded or debarred from participating in procurement transactions that use federal funds. Condition: During suspension and debarment testing, it was noted that the review process was not operating effectively. There was no support provided that 4 of the 5 vendors tested were reviewed for suspension and debarment. Questioned Costs: Not applicable. Context: 4 of 5 vendors tested had no formal review to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Oversight. Effect: Lack of proper documentation of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in paying suspended or debarred vendors. This could ultimately result in questioned costs. During testing, it was noted that there were no issues with the actual vendors used by the District. Repeat Finding: Not applicable. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of responsible official and planned corrective actions: There is no disagreement with the finding and there is a corrective action plan in place.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-003 ? Suspension and debarment Federal agency: U.S. Department of Agriculture Federal program title: Child Nutrition Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 10.553, 10.555, 10.556, and 10.559 Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): 1-0110-000 Award Period: July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 Type of Finding: ? Material weakness in internal control over compliance CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP): Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to the Finding: The District will continue to work on establishing procedures and controls to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Todd Swanson, Director of Finance and Operations. Planned Completion Date for CAP: June 30, 2022.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2020-06-30

$1,624,713 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 6, 2020 — management decision was due June 6, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$1,427,188 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$1,445,553 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2018 — management decision was due June 5, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,422,823 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 13, 2017 — management decision was due June 13, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,391,504 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2017 — management decision was due July 2, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.