← Back to home

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 31Local Government

EIN: 416000181

UEI: U8CLE8T1LY66

Audited by: BRADY MARTZ

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 3110 audit years9 findings
10
Audit Years
9
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$6.6M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,573,238 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 5, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 5, 2026 (89 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2025-002 Federal Program Child Nutrition Cluster (10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582) Compliance Requirement Eligibility Criteria Students receive a free or reduced meal by submitting an application online, or a paper application showing they are within the income threshold of the meal; or they are listed on MDE’s direct certification listing. Furthermore, a system of internal controls has all applications being reviewed and approved. Condition During testing, we noted two students who were listed incorrect in the District’s software. One student who the District could not provide support on their eligibility and one student whose application was not signed off by the district. Cause Management oversight Questioned Costs Undeterminable Context In a population over 250, 40 students who received either a free or reduced meal in FY25 was selected for testing. In this sample, we noted two students who were listed incorrectly in the District’s software when compared to the supporting data and one student who the District could not provide support for the reduced meal, and one student whose application was not signed off on. Effect The District could have improperly provided free or reduced meals to a student that wasn’t eligible. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure all students receive meals they qualify for, that all supporting documentation is retained, and that all applications are signed off as being reviewed and approved. Views of Responsible Officials The District will ensure all students will receive the meals they qualify for, retain all supporting documentation, and that all applications are being reviewed and approved.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2025-002 Federal Program Child Nutrition Cluster (10.553, 10.555, 10.559, 10.582) Compliance Requirement Eligibility Criteria Students receive a free or reduced meal by submitting an application online, or a paper application showing they are within the income threshold of the meal; or they are listed on MDE’s direct certification listing. Furthermore, a system of internal controls has all applications being reviewed and approved. Condition During testing, we noted two students who were listed incorrect in the District’s software. One student who the District could not provide support on their eligibility and one student whose application was not signed off by the district. Cause Management oversight Questioned Costs Undeterminable Context In a population over 250, 40 students who received either a free or reduced meal in FY25 was selected for testing. In this sample, we noted two students who were listed incorrectly in the District’s software when compared to the supporting data and one student who the District could not provide support for the reduced meal, and one student whose application was not signed off on. Effect The District could have improperly provided free or reduced meals to a student that wasn’t eligible. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should implement policies and procedures to ensure all students receive meals they qualify for, that all supporting documentation is retained, and that all applications are signed off as being reviewed and approved. Views of Responsible Officials The District will ensure all students will receive the meals they qualify for, retain all supporting documentation, and that all applications are being reviewed and approved.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Correcting Plan Food and Nutrition Service Coordinator will review applications and supporting documentation for completion and eligibility accuracy. 2. Explanation of Disagreement with the Audit Finding There is essentially no disagreement with the finding. 3. Official Responsible for Insuring CAP The Food and Nutrition Service Coordinator. 4. Planned Completion Date for CAP The CAP was implemented immediately during audit fieldwork performed in October 2025. 5. Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP The Food and Nutrition Service Coordinator will continually review applications and supporting documentation for completion and eligibility accuracy. Any issues noted will be communicated to appropriate staff and fixed immediately.

About Eligibility →

FY 2024-06-30

$12,009,638 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2024 — management decision was due June 19, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$12,904,569 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2023 — management decision was due June 20, 2024.

2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Federal Program 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Criteria Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition We noted during testing that the only 2 vendors who qualified for suspension and debarment testing, were not checked for suspension or debarment. Cause Management oversight. Questioned Costs None Context The District did not ensure they were entering into covered transactions with vendors who do not have an active exclusion from federal status. Effect The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance and had an increased risk of entering into a covered transaction with a vendor who has an active exclusion of federal funds. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should document all covered vendors used to ensure suspension and debarment requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials The District will ensure all covered vendors meet the requirements of suspension and debarment.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program 21.027 – Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Procurement, Suspension, and Debarment Criteria Non-federal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a non-procurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220. Condition We noted during testing that the only 2 vendors who qualified for suspension and debarment testing, were not checked for suspension or debarment. Cause Management oversight. Questioned Costs None Context The District did not ensure they were entering into covered transactions with vendors who do not have an active exclusion from federal status. Effect The District was not in compliance with Uniform Guidance and had an increased risk of entering into a covered transaction with a vendor who has an active exclusion of federal funds. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should document all covered vendors used to ensure suspension and debarment requirements are met. Views of Responsible Officials The District will ensure all covered vendors meet the requirements of suspension and debarment.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Correcting Plan The District has added the following procedure to be in compliance: 1) A Certification for Suspension and Debarment form was created and is required for vendors to sign before entering an agreement with them if they are paid with federal funds. 2. Explanation of Disagreement with the Audit Finding There is essentially no disagreement with the finding. 3. Official Responsible for Insuring CAP The Director of Business Services, Ashley Eastridge is responsible for carrying out the corrective action plan. 4. Planned Completion Date for CAP On November 2, 2023, the Director of Business Services sent the Certification of Suspension and Debarment form to all program supervisors that are responsible for running programs paid with federal funds and informed the program supervisors of the new procedure. 5. Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP The Director of Business Services will request documentation annually from the program supervisors for all contracts falling under this requirement. This request will be made before payment is made to the vendors.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2023-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Federal Program 84.425 – Education Stabilization Fund Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed Criteria The District is required to maintain internal controls at a level where proper review and approval of journal entries are met. Condition We tested 40 transactions and in the 40 transactions, 20 of these transactions, which came from 5 journal entries, which we noted were not approved by an individual outside of the journal entry preparer. Cause The District experienced turnover in the accounting department. Questioned Costs None Context The District did not ensure journal entries were reviewed and approved by a separate individual. Effect The District was had an increased risk of improper journal entries being made to federal funds. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should ensure all journal entries are reviewed and approved. Views of Responsible Officials The District will ensure all journal entries are reviewed and approved.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program 84.425 – Education Stabilization Fund Allowable Costs/Activities Allowed Criteria The District is required to maintain internal controls at a level where proper review and approval of journal entries are met. Condition We tested 40 transactions and in the 40 transactions, 20 of these transactions, which came from 5 journal entries, which we noted were not approved by an individual outside of the journal entry preparer. Cause The District experienced turnover in the accounting department. Questioned Costs None Context The District did not ensure journal entries were reviewed and approved by a separate individual. Effect The District was had an increased risk of improper journal entries being made to federal funds. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The District should ensure all journal entries are reviewed and approved. Views of Responsible Officials The District will ensure all journal entries are reviewed and approved.

Corrective Action Plan

1. Correcting Plan The District has added the following procedure to mitigate the risk: 1) All journal entries made by the Director of Business Services will be reviewed and approved by the Superintendent. 2. Explanation of Disagreement with the Audit Finding There is essentially no disagreement with the finding. 3. Official Responsible for Insuring CAP The Director of Business Services, Ashley Eastridge is responsible for carrying out the corrective action plan. 4. Planned Completion Date for CAP The Director of Business Services will review this monthly when month-end and year-end procedures are completed. 5. Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP The Director of Business Services will have documentation available for the Superintendent and/or School Board to review if requested.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-06-30

$11,570,352 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 6, 2023 — management decision was due February 6, 2024.

FY 2021-06-30

$12,386,313 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,638,127 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 4, 2021 — management decision was due July 4, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$4,945,113 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 23, 2020 — management decision was due July 23, 2020.

2019-001
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Condition Testing of 40 applications found two instances where the application was not filled out properly and one instance where the students on the application were placed into an incorrect meal price category. ? One application was signed by a member not part of the household. ? One application was missing information in the household income section. ? One application had two foster students that were placed into the wrong meal price category. Criteria Uniform Single Audit guidance requires recipients of federal funds to have appropriate internal controls to ensure all free and reduced applications are properly completed and applied appropriately to the student?s accounts. Effect Lacking controls could lead to noncompliance with the requirements of this program and could require the return of grant funds to the grantor agency. Cause The District?s controls are not adequate to ensure the accuracy in the eligibility process. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend the District design and implement internal controls and to ensure all free and reduced applications are completed properly and accurately applied to the student account.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition Testing of 40 applications found two instances where the application was not filled out properly and one instance where the students on the application were placed into an incorrect meal price category. ? One application was signed by a member not part of the household. ? One application was missing information in the household income section. ? One application had two foster students that were placed into the wrong meal price category. Criteria Uniform Single Audit guidance requires recipients of federal funds to have appropriate internal controls to ensure all free and reduced applications are properly completed and applied appropriately to the student?s accounts. Effect Lacking controls could lead to noncompliance with the requirements of this program and could require the return of grant funds to the grantor agency. Cause The District?s controls are not adequate to ensure the accuracy in the eligibility process. Repeat Finding No Recommendation We recommend the District design and implement internal controls and to ensure all free and reduced applications are completed properly and accurately applied to the student account.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding: 2019-001- Child Nutrition Cluster, CFDA No. 15.553, 15.555 and 15.559- Application Eligibility Corrective Action Plan Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Finding There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Actions Planned in Response to Finding: District Staff will scrutinize applications closer. Recent 19/20 application audit by the State of Minnesota revealed zero errors on 600 applications. Official Responsible for Ensuring CAP Implementation Chris J. Leinen, Business Manager. Planned Completion of CAP July 1, 2019 Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP Review applications through State monitoring process.

About Eligibility →

FY 2018-06-30

$5,245,512 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 27, 2019 — management decision was due July 27, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,704,721 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 8, 2018 — management decision was due October 8, 2018.

2017-001
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,867,005 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 29, 2016 — management decision was due June 29, 2017.

2016-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →
2016-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-003
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →
2016-004
Period of Performance
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.