← Back to home

NHHI - BROOKLYN PARK, INC.Non-Profit

EIN: 411867791

UEI: RXT4B3GRE5C4

Audited by: BAKER MEINZ & ASSOCIATES, LTD

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 31, 2026

NHHI - BROOKLYN PARK, INC.10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-09-30

$1,976,519 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 20, 2026 (43 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-001
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee percentage for the year needed to be revised. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 1, $34,483; Sample - 1, $34,483; Not in Compliance - 1, $58; Questioned Costs - $58; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $58 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fees as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development - $58; Non-compliance code - J

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee percentage for the year needed to be revised. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 1, $34,483; Sample - 1, $34,483; Not in Compliance - 1, $58; Questioned Costs - $58; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $58 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fees as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development - $58; Non-compliance code - J

Corrective Action Plan

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NHHI - Brooklyn Park, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2025. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Baker Meinz & Associates, Ltd. 1000 Shelard Parkway, Suite 110 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Audit Period: September 30, 2025; The finding from the September 30, 2025 schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the number assigned in the schedule. Section A of the schedule, Summary of Audit Results, does not include findings and is not addressed. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT - NONE; FINDINGS - FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT - DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - FINDING 2025-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 - The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $58 to the Project. Action Taken: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company repaid the overpaid management fees in November 2025. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please call Michael Thomas at 651-639-9799.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2024-09-30

$1,953,591 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2025 — management decision was due July 20, 2025.

2024-001
Cost Allowability
QUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee percentage for the year needed to be revised. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 1, $32,454; Sample - 1, $32,454; Not in Compliance - 1, $32,454; Questioned Costs $120; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $120 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fees as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development $120; Non-compliance code - J

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

FINDING 2024-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 Condition: The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Criteria: The management company should calculate management fees using the correct formula. Effect: The Project's management fee expense is overstated. Context: The management fee for the year was tested for accuracy. The test determined that the management fee percentage for the year needed to be revised. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 1, $32,454; Sample - 1, $32,454; Not in Compliance - 1, $32,454; Questioned Costs $120; Cause: The management company did not compute the management fee correctly. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $120 to the Project. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company will repay the overpaid management fees as soon as possible. Questioned Costs - Department of Housing and Urban Development $120; Non-compliance code - J

Corrective Action Plan

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NHHI - Brooklyn Park, Inc. respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended September 30, 2024. Name and address of independent public accounting firm: Baker Meinz & Associates, Ltd. 1000 Shelard Parkway, Suite 110 Minneapolis, MN 55426 Audit Period: September 30, 2024 The finding from the September 30, 2024 schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. Section A of the schedule, Summary of Audit Results, does not include findings and is not addressed. FINDINGS - FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT-NONE; FINDINGS - FEDERAL AWARD PROGRAMS AUDIT DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FINDING 2024-001: SECTION 811, ASSISTANCE LISTING NUMBER 14.181 The Project overpaid management fees to the management company. Recommendation: The management company should repay the $120 to the Project. Action Taken: The Project agrees with the finding. The management company repaid the overpaid management fees in October 2024. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding this plan, please call JoAnn Rademacher at 651-639-9799.

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2023-09-30

$1,917,631 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 5, 2024 — management decision was due August 5, 2024.

FY 2022-09-30

$1,901,464 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 19, 2022 — management decision was due June 19, 2023.

FY 2021-09-30

$1,901,266 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 24, 2022 — management decision was due July 24, 2022.

FY 2020-09-30

$1,853,422 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2021 — management decision was due July 31, 2021.

FY 2019-09-30

$1,844,395 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on August 16, 2020 — management decision was due February 16, 2021.

FY 2018-09-30

$1,835,642 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 8, 2019 — management decision was due November 8, 2019.

FY 2017-09-30

$1,828,186 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 3, 2018 — management decision was due December 3, 2018.

FY 2016-09-30

$1,815,479 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 18, 2017 — management decision was due December 18, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.