EIN: 411797256
UEI: NF1MSN6KN4W3
Audited by: BAKER MEINZ & ASSOCIATES, LTD
Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on June 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by December 24, 2026 (112 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on May 6, 2025 — management decision was due November 6, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on August 4, 2024 — management decision was due February 4, 2025.
One of the tenant files tested contained a mathematical error in computing household income in the process of computing the tenant share of monthly rent. Criteria: Household income should be computed accurately based on information provided by the tenant. Effect: There is no financial effect. Context: A sample of tenant files was selected for testing household income in the process of computing the tenant share of monthly rent. The test found a calculation that was not in compliance. The non-compliance did not have a financial effect. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 22, Dollars - N/A; Sample - 3, Dollars - N/A; Not in Compliance -1, $372; Questioned Costs - $372. Cause: There was an error in interpreting some information provided by the tenant during the certification process. Recommendation: The Project should recompute the HUD subsidy and tenant rent for this tenant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. Tenant rent will be recomputed and management will adjust a future monthly HUD billing. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $372. Non-compliance code: R
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: One of the tenant files tested contained a mathematical error in computing household income in the process of computing the tenant share of monthly rent. Criteria: Household income should be computed accurately based on information provided by the tenant. Effect: There is no financial effect. Context: A sample of tenant files was selected for testing household income in the process of computing the tenant share of monthly rent. The test found a calculation that was not in compliance. The non-compliance did not have a financial effect. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 22, Dollars - N/A; Sample - 3, Dollars - N/A; Not in Compliance -1, $372; Questioned Costs - $372. Cause: There was an error in interpreting some information provided by the tenant during the certification process. Recommendation: The Project should recompute the HUD subsidy and tenant rent for this tenant. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. Tenant rent will be recomputed and management will adjust a future monthly HUD billing. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $372. Non-compliance code: R
Condition: One of the tenant files tested contained a mathematical error in computing household income in the process of computing the tenant share of monthly rent. Recommendation: The Project should recompute the HUD subsidy and tenant rent for this tenant and adjust a future monthly billing. Project managers should be aware of the importance of computing the tenant's household income correctly. Action taken: The Project agrees with the finding. Tenant rent was recomputed in January 2024. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding these plans, please call Chuck Reuter at 651-645-7271.
In 1 of 25 cash disbursements tested, the Project paid the expense of another project under common management. Criteria: The Project should not pay the expenses of another project. Effect: The amount of expenses incorrectly paid was $125 out of a total sample of disbursements of $11,561. Context: A sample of disbursements was selected for testing of compliance. The test found one disbursement that was not in compliance. The non compliance had a financial effect outlined below. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 239, $155,379; Sample - 25, $11,561; Not in Compliance - 1, $125; Questioned Costs - $125. Cause: The Project mistakenly paid part of an invoice of another project under common management. Recommendation: The Project should carefully review invoices before payment to make sure it only pays the proper amount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The accounts payable staff will be reminded to be careful when entering invoices for payment. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $125. Non-compliance code - R.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Condition: In 1 of 25 cash disbursements tested, the Project paid the expense of another project under common management. Criteria: The Project should not pay the expenses of another project. Effect: The amount of expenses incorrectly paid was $125 out of a total sample of disbursements of $11,561. Context: A sample of disbursements was selected for testing of compliance. The test found one disbursement that was not in compliance. The non compliance had a financial effect outlined below. The details and results of the sample are as follows: Population - 239, $155,379; Sample - 25, $11,561; Not in Compliance - 1, $125; Questioned Costs - $125. Cause: The Project mistakenly paid part of an invoice of another project under common management. Recommendation: The Project should carefully review invoices before payment to make sure it only pays the proper amount. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Project agrees with the finding. The accounts payable staff will be reminded to be careful when entering invoices for payment. Total-Department of Housing and Urban Development - $125. Non-compliance code - R.
Condition: In 1 of 25 cash disbursements tested, the Project paid the expense of another project under common management. Recommendation: The Project should carefully review invoices before payment to make sure it only pays the proper amount. Action Taken: The Project agrees with the finding. The accounts payable staff will be reminded to be careful when entering invoices for payment. The finding was corrected in January 2024. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development has questions regarding these plans, please call Chuck Reuter at 651-645-7271.
FAC accepted this audit on June 11, 2023 — management decision was due December 11, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on June 19, 2022 — management decision was due December 19, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on June 13, 2021 — management decision was due December 13, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on December 25, 2020 — management decision was due June 25, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on August 20, 2019 — management decision was due February 20, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on July 22, 2018 — management decision was due January 22, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on September 5, 2017 — management decision was due March 5, 2018.
GSA_MIGRATION
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴GSA_MIGRATION
GSA_MIGRATION
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
