Zumbro Education DistrictLocal Government

EIN: 411645079

UEI: W8EZN3LK2GM5

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Zumbro Education District10 audit years2 findings
10
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,378,483 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 31, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 1, 2026 (59 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$2,695,057 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2025 — management decision was due July 15, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$2,675,145 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2024 — management decision was due July 22, 2024.

2023-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

During suspension and debarment testing, it was noted that the review process was not operating effectively. There was no evidence of the District verifying five out of five sampled vendors for suspension and debarment requirements prior to entering a covered transaction with the vendor. However, none of the five vendors were found to have been suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Questioned Costs None Context: None of the vendors that were tested had no review to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Oversight. Effect: Lack of proper documentation of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in paying suspended or debarred vendors. This could ultimately results in questioned costs. After review of vendors, it was noted that no vendors used were on the suspension or debarment list. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: US Department of Education Federal Program Name: Special Education (IDEA) Cluster Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, and 84.173X Pass-Through Agency: Minnesota Department of Education Pass-Through Number(s): H027A220087, H027X210087, H173A220086, H027X210086 Award Period: July 1, 2022 – June 30, 2023 Type of Finding: Material Weakness in internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per 2 CRF Section 180.995, the District should have controls in place to review vendors showing they are not suspended or debarred from participating in procurement transactions that use federal funds. Condition: During suspension and debarment testing, it was noted that the review process was not operating effectively. There was no evidence of the District verifying five out of five sampled vendors for suspension and debarment requirements prior to entering a covered transaction with the vendor. However, none of the five vendors were found to have been suspended or debarred from participating in federal programs. Questioned Costs None Context: None of the vendors that were tested had no review to ensure they were not suspended or debarred. Cause: Oversight. Effect: Lack of proper documentation of controls over compliance with suspension and debarment requirements could result in paying suspended or debarred vendors. This could ultimately results in questioned costs. After review of vendors, it was noted that no vendors used were on the suspension or debarment list. Repeat Finding: This is not a repeat finding. Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Assistance Listing Number: 84.027, 84.027X, 84.173, and 84.173X – Special Education Recommendation: We recommend the District implement procedures and controls to ensure vendors are not suspended or debarred Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The District will work to implement procedures so vendors are verified to the suspensions and debarred list. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jackie Paradis, Business Manager and Patrick Gordon, Executive Director. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2024.

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2022-06-30

$2,808,152 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2023 — management decision was due August 26, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

$2,690,223 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2021 — management decision was due June 21, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

$2,478,535 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2021 — management decision was due August 7, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

$2,596,968 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 11, 2020 — management decision was due July 11, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$2,430,620 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2019 — management decision was due July 8, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$2,344,133 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2018 — management decision was due July 8, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$2,238,432 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 26, 2017 — management decision was due August 26, 2017.

2016-002
Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.