← Back to home

Community Action Partnership of Hennepin CountyNon-Profit

EIN: 411524088

UEI: TS5AGF329B84

Audited by: BerganKDV, LTD.

Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County10 audit years8 findings3 repeat
10
Audit Years
8
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings
$16.7M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$16,676,959 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on April 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by October 24, 2026 (51 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,684,954 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on April 28, 2025 — management decision was due October 28, 2025.

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$24,259,883 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 30, 2024 — management decision was due November 30, 2024.

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$31,118,721 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2023 — management decision was due November 1, 2023.

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$19,880,250 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 1, 2022 — management decision was due November 1, 2022.

2021-001
Subrecipient Monitoring
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

Audit Finding 2021-001 ? Lack of Documentation Related to Subrecipient Monitoring Controls U.S. Department of Human and Health Services Pass through Minnesota Department of Human Services Community Services Block Grant Assistance listing number 93.569 Subrecipient monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.332 states all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. It also states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Condition/Context: Management did not include the federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass- through entity on the subrecipient, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward in one of two subrecipient agreements. Management also did not maintain thorough documentation of the monitoring activities performed over the subrecipients. Cause: Those preparing and reviewing the subrecipient agreements did not identify all requirements under Uniform Guidance. Those monitoring the subrecipients did not thoroughly document the procedures and results of those activities. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified. Effect or potential effect: As a result of this condition, the subrecipient receiving the subaward may not fully understand the compliance requirements that are applicable to the federal funds being received. Lack of proper documentation of monitoring activities could lead to noncompliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals. Recommendation: The Organization should review its policies and procedures to ensure all subrecipient agreements include the federal award identification, such as the award number, amount of the award, federal agency where the funds originated, assistance listing number, along with the other required items. The Organization should consider implementing monitoring tools to thoroughly document the activities performed. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the recommendation. Policies and procedures have been written that will be followed when structuring all subrecipient agreements so that all required items will be part of the agreement as written in the policy. Monitoring tools and templates will be used to consistently monitor subrecipients. All policies, procedures, tools, and monitoring documents will be stored in a location within the Organization's file sharing software that authorized staff will have access. This will make sure that necessary tools and documents will be stored in one location that will allow authorized staff to access them as needed even in the event of staff departures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Audit Finding 2021-001 ? Lack of Documentation Related to Subrecipient Monitoring Controls U.S. Department of Human and Health Services Pass through Minnesota Department of Human Services Community Services Block Grant Assistance listing number 93.569 Subrecipient monitoring Criteria: 2 CFR Part 200.332 states all pass-through entities must ensure that every subaward is clearly identified to the subrecipient as a subaward and includes the following information at the time of the subaward and if any of these data elements change, include the changes in subsequent subaward modification. It also states to monitor the activities of the subrecipient as necessary to ensure that the subaward is used for authorized purposes, in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the subaward; and that subaward performance goals are achieved. Condition/Context: Management did not include the federal award identification, all requirements imposed by the pass- through entity on the subrecipient, and appropriate terms and conditions concerning closeout of the subaward in one of two subrecipient agreements. Management also did not maintain thorough documentation of the monitoring activities performed over the subrecipients. Cause: Those preparing and reviewing the subrecipient agreements did not identify all requirements under Uniform Guidance. Those monitoring the subrecipients did not thoroughly document the procedures and results of those activities. Questioned costs: No questioned costs were identified. Effect or potential effect: As a result of this condition, the subrecipient receiving the subaward may not fully understand the compliance requirements that are applicable to the federal funds being received. Lack of proper documentation of monitoring activities could lead to noncompliance with program requirements and achievement of performance goals. Recommendation: The Organization should review its policies and procedures to ensure all subrecipient agreements include the federal award identification, such as the award number, amount of the award, federal agency where the funds originated, assistance listing number, along with the other required items. The Organization should consider implementing monitoring tools to thoroughly document the activities performed. Views of responsible officials: Management concurs with the recommendation. Policies and procedures have been written that will be followed when structuring all subrecipient agreements so that all required items will be part of the agreement as written in the policy. Monitoring tools and templates will be used to consistently monitor subrecipients. All policies, procedures, tools, and monitoring documents will be stored in a location within the Organization's file sharing software that authorized staff will have access. This will make sure that necessary tools and documents will be stored in one location that will allow authorized staff to access them as needed even in the event of staff departures.

Corrective Action Plan

Community Action Partnership of Hennepin County respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year ended 12-31-2021. Auditor: BerganKDV Audit Period: 1-1-2021 to 12-31-2021 The finding from the 12-31-2021 Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. SECTION III ? FEDERAL AWARD FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS Significant Deficiency: Audit Finding 2021-001 ? Lack of Documentation Related to Subrecipient Monitoring Controls U.S. Department of Human and Health Services Pass through Minnesota Department of Human Services Community Services Block Grant Assistance listing number 93.569 Subrecipient monitoring Recommendation: The Organization should review its policies and procedures to ensure all subrecipient agreements include the federal award identification, such as the award number, amount of the award, federal agency where the funds originated, assistance listing number, along with the other required items. The Organization should consider implementing monitoring tools to thoroughly document the activities performed. Action taken: Management concurs with the recommendation. Policies and procedures have been written that will be followed when structuring all subrecipient agreements so that all required items will be part of the agreement as written in the policy. Monitoring tools and templates will be used to consistently monitor subrecipients. All policies, procedures, tools, and monitoring documents will be stored in a location within the Organization?s file sharing software that authorized staff will have access. This will make sure that necessary tools and documents will be stored in one location that will allow authorized staff to access them as needed even in the event of staff departures. Responsible contacts: Todd Blooflat, CFO and Kendra Krolik, CSO Anticipated completion date: April 29, 2022

About Subrecipient Monitoring →

FY 2020-12-31

$14,825,467 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 5, 2021 — management decision was due November 5, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

$16,626,904 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on May 10, 2020 — management decision was due November 10, 2020.

FY 2018-12-31

$16,653,146 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on May 19, 2019 — management decision was due November 19, 2019.

2018-004
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-005

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-005

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2017-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$14,144,619 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2018 — management decision was due March 25, 2019.

2017-004
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2016-003

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-003

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2017-005
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Period of Performance / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINIONREPEAT OF 2016-004QUESTIONED COSTS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-004

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Period of Performance, Reporting →
2017-006
Eligibility
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Eligibility →

FY 2016-12-31

MATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSEDLOW-RISK AUDITEE$18,070,017 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 24, 2017 — management decision was due March 24, 2018.

2016-003
Cost Allowability
MATERIAL WEAKNESSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2016-004
Cost Allowability / Cash Management / Period of Performance / Reporting
MATERIAL WEAKNESSQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Allowable Costs / Cost Principles, Cash Management, Period of Performance, Reporting →
2016-006
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.