← Back to home

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 712Local Government

EIN: 411521544

UEI: N8L3FJPMZL93

Audited by: BRADY, MARTZ & ASSOCIATES

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7122 audit years3 findings
2
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$1.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2022)

FY 2022-06-30

$1,429,173 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 6, 2023. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 6, 2023 (1121 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2022-003
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

We tested a sample of 40 transactions and noted 1 transaction did not receive pre-approval before purchase. We also noted 1 payroll transaction that did not list the accurate wage on the employee?s signed contract. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested a sample of 40 transactions and noted 1 transaction did not receive pre-approval before purchase. We also noted 1 payroll transaction that did not list the accurate wage on the employee?s signed contract. Cause: Management Oversight. Effect: The District could make a purchase, or pay wages, with federal dollars that is not an allowable expense. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The district should follow their purchasing policy to ensure all non-occurring transactions have an approved purchase order before the transaction is purchased. The district should also implement procedures that ensure that all employee contracts have the correct wage amount listed on the contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Allowable Activities/Allowable Costs Criteria: The District?s purchasing policy requires an approved purchase order for all purchases except reoccurring purchases. The District also has signed contacts that show the salary amount for all employee?s who sign a contract. Condition: We tested a sample of 40 transactions and noted 1 transaction did not receive pre-approval before purchase. We also noted 1 payroll transaction that did not list the accurate wage on the employee?s signed contract. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We tested a sample of 40 transactions and noted 1 transaction did not receive pre-approval before purchase. We also noted 1 payroll transaction that did not list the accurate wage on the employee?s signed contract. Cause: Management Oversight. Effect: The District could make a purchase, or pay wages, with federal dollars that is not an allowable expense. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The district should follow their purchasing policy to ensure all non-occurring transactions have an approved purchase order before the transaction is purchased. The district should also implement procedures that ensure that all employee contracts have the correct wage amount listed on the contract. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-003 FINDING Contact Person ? Reggie Engebritson, Superintendent Corrective Action Plan ? The District will review and update their policies and procedures. Completion Date ? March 30, 2023

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The District entered into 1 contract in fiscal year 2022 that was paid with ESSER grant dollars. We noted this contract did not have the required wage rate verbiage listed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District entered into 1 contract in fiscal year 2022 that was paid with ESSER grant dollars. We noted this contract did not have the required wage rate verbiage listed. Cause: Management Oversight. Effect: The District entered into a construction contract that did not comply with the rules set by Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The District should follow their ?Provisions included in All Contracts Charged to Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200 Appendix II)? section of their purchasing policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: COVID-19 Education Stabilization Fund (AL 84.425) Special Tests and Provisions ? Wage Rate Criteria: Uniform Guidance states ?Nonfederal entities shall include in their construction contracts subject to the Wage Rate Requirements a provision that the contract or subcontractor comply with those requirements and DOL regulations.? Condition: The District entered into 1 contract in fiscal year 2022 that was paid with ESSER grant dollars. We noted this contract did not have the required wage rate verbiage listed. Questioned Costs: None. Context: The District entered into 1 contract in fiscal year 2022 that was paid with ESSER grant dollars. We noted this contract did not have the required wage rate verbiage listed. Cause: Management Oversight. Effect: The District entered into a construction contract that did not comply with the rules set by Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The District should follow their ?Provisions included in All Contracts Charged to Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200 Appendix II)? section of their purchasing policy. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-004 FINDING Contact Person ? Reggie Engebritson, Superintendent Corrective Action Plan ? The District will review and update their policies and procedures. Completion Date ? March 30, 2023

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2021-06-30

$1,136,532 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 20, 2021 — management decision was due June 20, 2022.

2021-003
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The daily counts sheets were reported in a monthly summary, and the totals from the monthly summary were submitted to state for reimbursement. Our population included the daily records for the meals served, and our population included 204 days and we tested 21 days. Six of the 21 days did not agree with meal counts reported in the monthly summary. The sample total was $44,506 and the net difference in meals reported was $205. Questioned Costs: None Context: The District misstated the daily meal counts on the monthly reports submitted for reimbursement. Cause: The District does not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure all meals are reported correctly. Effect: The District misstated the monthly meal counts submitted for reimbursement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should review their policies and procedures for submitting meal counts for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Program: Child Nutrition Cluster (AL 10.555 & 10.559): Cash Management; Criteria: To receive reimbursement payment for meals served, the District must submit the number of meals served and all claims must be supported by accurate meal counts by category and type. Condition: The daily counts sheets were reported in a monthly summary, and the totals from the monthly summary were submitted to state for reimbursement. Our population included the daily records for the meals served, and our population included 204 days and we tested 21 days. Six of the 21 days did not agree with meal counts reported in the monthly summary. The sample total was $44,506 and the net difference in meals reported was $205. Questioned Costs: None Context: The District misstated the daily meal counts on the monthly reports submitted for reimbursement. Cause: The District does not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure all meals are reported correctly. Effect: The District misstated the monthly meal counts submitted for reimbursement. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: The District should review their policies and procedures for submitting meal counts for reimbursement. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The District agrees with the recommendation and will review its policies and procedures.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-003 FINDING Contact Person ? Reggie Engebritson, Superintendent Corrective Action Plan ? The District will review policies and procedures for submitting meal counts for reimbursement. Completion Date ? January 1, 2022

About Cash Management →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.