← Back to home

Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual AssaultNon-Profit

EIN: 411459621

UEI: DNPKEA722MR4

Audited by: Abdo

Oversight agency: 16 [Department of Justice]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault10 audit years4 findings1 repeat
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$1,197,717 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by August 13, 2026 (19 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

$1,823,701 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 20, 2025 — management decision was due August 20, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

$1,694,141 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on April 10, 2024 — management decision was due October 10, 2024.

2023-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

We noted that some Federal expenditures for certain listed programs did not agree to the underlying financial records. The underlying financial records are prepared in accordance to requirements in 2 CFR 200.502 and thus the expenditures per program should agree with the underlying financial records. Certain accruals of expenses were made in the financial records that were not reflected on the SEFA. Criteria:The Code of Federal Regulations requires that auditees prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (2 CFR 200.510(b)) and display all Federal expenditures per Federal program (2 CFR 200.510(b)(3)) in accordance with the expenditure guidelines at 2 CFR 200.502. Expenditures should be based, generally, on when the activity occurred. In general, this means that the SEFA will agree to the underlying financial records. Cause:This was due to a misunderstanding of how the accruals should relate to the SEFA. Effect:The SEFA was overstated for the current year before correction. Context:This issue does not appear pervasive. While the misstatement was material, the accruals were unusual and not a pervasive mistake. Recommendation:We recommend fully agreeing the SEFA to the underlying financial statements. The reconciliation process was completed with the exception of these accruals. We recommend including the accruals in most cases since Federal expenditures are generally calculated in accordance with GAAP accrual accounting. Deviations from GAAP can be found at 2 CFR 200.502. Views of Responsible Officials:Management agrees with the finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition:We noted that some Federal expenditures for certain listed programs did not agree to the underlying financial records. The underlying financial records are prepared in accordance to requirements in 2 CFR 200.502 and thus the expenditures per program should agree with the underlying financial records. Certain accruals of expenses were made in the financial records that were not reflected on the SEFA. Criteria:The Code of Federal Regulations requires that auditees prepare the Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) (2 CFR 200.510(b)) and display all Federal expenditures per Federal program (2 CFR 200.510(b)(3)) in accordance with the expenditure guidelines at 2 CFR 200.502. Expenditures should be based, generally, on when the activity occurred. In general, this means that the SEFA will agree to the underlying financial records. Cause:This was due to a misunderstanding of how the accruals should relate to the SEFA. Effect:The SEFA was overstated for the current year before correction. Context:This issue does not appear pervasive. While the misstatement was material, the accruals were unusual and not a pervasive mistake. Recommendation:We recommend fully agreeing the SEFA to the underlying financial statements. The reconciliation process was completed with the exception of these accruals. We recommend including the accruals in most cases since Federal expenditures are generally calculated in accordance with GAAP accrual accounting. Deviations from GAAP can be found at 2 CFR 200.502. Views of Responsible Officials:Management agrees with the finding.

Corrective Action Plan

MNCASA and MACC will implement a review process for accruals and reversals; this review process will occur at the end of each month and the end of the fiscal year. This process will ensure that the ledger matches the SEFA reporting, accruals, and reversals and is done in a timely manner. MNCASA and MACC staff will also attend a training session on SEFA prepartation to increase our knowledge and ensure proper reporting.

About Other →

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,462,977 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 28, 2023 — management decision was due August 28, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,206,219 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on February 13, 2022 — management decision was due August 13, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,061,010 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on February 7, 2021 — management decision was due August 7, 2021.

2020-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

During our procedures, we noted several paid invoices with no evidence of approval. Criteria: The Organization's internal controls requires proper authorization of expenditures. Cause: While staff were working from home due to COVID the Organization did not have a system set up to attach the electronic approvals to the invoices, and some approvals from invoices during that time period could not be located. Effect: As a result, there was a potential for unauthorized purchases that do not conform with federal or grant-specific requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review their control procedures so that if a remote work setting occurs again, electronic approval documentation gets attached to the invoice in the system for easy retrieval and no invoices get paid without proper approval.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Condition: During our procedures, we noted several paid invoices with no evidence of approval. Criteria: The Organization's internal controls requires proper authorization of expenditures. Cause: While staff were working from home due to COVID the Organization did not have a system set up to attach the electronic approvals to the invoices, and some approvals from invoices during that time period could not be located. Effect: As a result, there was a potential for unauthorized purchases that do not conform with federal or grant-specific requirements. Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review their control procedures so that if a remote work setting occurs again, electronic approval documentation gets attached to the invoice in the system for easy retrieval and no invoices get paid without proper approval.

Corrective Action Plan

The findings from the June 30, 2020 schedule of findings and questioned costs are discussed below. The findings are numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. 2020-001 - OVW Technical Assistance Initiative Program - Significant Deficiency in Internal Controls over Compliance U.S. Department of Justice: OVW Technical Assistance Initiative Program - CFDA 16.526 Recommendation: We recommend that the Organization review their control procedures so that if a remote work setting occurs again, electronic approval documentation gets attached to the invoice in the system for easy retrieval and no invoices get paid without proper approval. Planned Action Minnesota Coalition Against Sexual Assault will correct this deficiency in the 2021 fiscal year by implementing the following corrected credit card expense approval process: ? MNCASA Credit Card statement is downloaded on the 5th day of the month by Accounting Specialist. ? Accounting Specialist then prepares invoices and master spreadsheet of charges, including coding on recurring items, and distributes to all those using credit cards. ? Users are given 3-5 days to provide supporting receipts and proper coding of expenses. ? Executive Director reviews all invoices and charges and emails written approval of master spreadsheet to Accounting Specialist. **This replaces live signature procedure to accommodate remote working conditions currently in place.** ? Master spreadsheet with complete coding, supporting receipts, and emailed ED approval are forwarded to A/P Accountant for processing of payment. The Organization strives to remain compliant with Uniform Guidance in all respects to present both accurate and transparent records. If the Department of Justice has questions regarding this plan, please call Artika Roller, Executive Director at 651-209-0899.

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,087,825 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

$1,153,276 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2019 — management decision was due July 15, 2019.

2018-001
Cash Management
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Cash Management →

FY 2017-06-30

$1,415,753 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 31, 2018 — management decision was due July 31, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$1,187,299 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 21, 2017 — management decision was due September 21, 2017.

2016-003
Cash Management / Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-003

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-003

About Cash Management, Reporting →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.