← Back to home

BrightworksLocal Government

EIN: 411287770

UEI: ZLJEV644D6M9

Audited by: Abdo, LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Brightworks10 audit years7 findings6 repeat
10
Audit Years
7
Total Findings
6
Repeat Findings
$6.9M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$6,887,897 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 7, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 7, 2026 (53 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$13,046,248 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 7, 2024 — management decision was due May 7, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$17,555,099 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2023 — management decision was due May 1, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$21,979,761 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 8, 2022 — management decision was due May 8, 2023.

2022-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-001

During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed including review of journal entries and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records. 89

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 Limited Segregation of Duties Condition: During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed including review of journal entries and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records. 89

Corrective Action Plan

Following is our response to findings in the audit as of June 30, 2022: FINDING 2022-001: Limited Segregation of Duties Our study and evaluation disclosed that because of the limited size of the office staff, the ECSU has limited segregation of duties. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP): 1. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. 2. Action Planned in Response to Finding: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records. 3. Office Responsible for Ensuring CAP: John Schultz, Executive Director 4. Planned Completion Date for CAP: Not applicable 5. Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP: Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Other →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,695,379 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 17, 2021 — management decision was due May 17, 2022.

2021-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2020-001

During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 Limited Segregation of Duties Condition: During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Corrective Action Plan

Following is our response to findings in the audit as of June 30, 2021: FINDING 2021-001: Limited Segregation of Duties Our study and evaluation disclosed that because of the limited size of the office staff, the ECSU has limited segregation of duties. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP): 1. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. 2. Action Planned in Response to Finding: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records. 3. Office Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Julie Frame, Executive Director 4. Planned Completion Date for CAP: Not applicable 5. Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP: Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Prior Finding References

2020-001

About Other →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,290,635 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 18, 2020 — management decision was due May 18, 2021.

2020-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2019-001OTHER MATTERS

During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001 Limited Segregation of Duties Condition: During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Corrective Action Plan

2020-001 Limited Segregation of Duties Condition: During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Other →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,474,686 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 19, 2019 — management decision was due May 19, 2020.

2019-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2018-001OTHER MATTERS

During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001 Limited Segregation of Duties Condition: During our audit, we reviewed procedures within each of the ECSU?s major transaction cycles and found the ECSU to have limited segregation of duties in those transaction cycles. Criteria: There are four general categories of duties: authorization, custody of assets, record keeping and reconciliation. In an ideal system, different employees perform each of these four major functions. In other words, no one person has control of two or more of these responsibilities. Cause: The ECSU has a limited number of staff to properly segregate duties in each of the major transaction cycles. Effect: The effectiveness of the internal control system relies on enforcement by management. The effect of deficiencies in segregation of duties and internal controls can result in undetected errors or misappropriation of assets of the ECSU. Recommendation: While we recognize staff is not large enough to eliminate these deficiencies, we believe the risk can be reduced with sufficient monitoring. The ESCU should evaluate their internal controls on a yearly basis and implement procedures they deem appropriate to reduce the risks involved with this finding. It is important that the Executive Committee is aware of this condition and monitor all financial information. Management Response: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Corrective Action Plan

Following is our response to findings in the audit as of June 30, 2019: FINDING 2019-001: Our study and evaluation disclosed that because of the limited size of the office staff, the ECSU has limited segregation of duties. CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP): 1. Explanation of Disagreement with Audit Findings: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. 2. Action Planned in Response to Finding: Management recognizes the deficiency but determines that it is not economically feasible to correct this finding. Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records. 3. Office Responsible for Ensuring CAP: Julie Frame, Executive Director 4. Planned Completion Date for CAP: Not applicable 5. Plan to Monitor Completion of CAP: Additional internal controls will be developed and implemented to reduce the risk of fraud and misstatement of financial records.

Prior Finding References

2018-001

About Other →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,094,592 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2018 — management decision was due June 10, 2019.

2018-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2017-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2017-001

About Other →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,078,333 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 22, 2018 — management decision was due July 22, 2018.

2017-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-001

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-001

About Other →
2017-002
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,872,636 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 21, 2016 — management decision was due June 21, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.