← Back to home

NORTHWEST REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONLocal Government

EIN: 411231594

UEI: UGD9JGAMWL23

Audited by: BRADY MARTZ

Oversight agency: 11 [Department of Commerce]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

NORTHWEST REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION10 audit years4 findings
10
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$7.4M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,401,953 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on May 27, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by November 27, 2026 (82 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,316,079 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 30, 2025 — management decision was due December 30, 2025.

2024-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

2024-001: Significant Deficiency Economic Adjustment Assistance – 11.307 – Reporting Criteria Federal reporting requirements require all reports to be completed accurately. Condition One report was not accurately completed. Cause The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that the reports were completed accurately. Effect One report was completed inaccurately, resulting in noncompliance with reporting requirements. Questioned Costs These errors noted were due to missing two loans on the report. No questioned costs. Context Two reports were selected for testing – ED-209 and ED-917. Only the ED-917 report contained errors. With the ED-917 report, the reporting period was for July 2023 to June 2024, but two loans from late 2023 were not included in the report due to management oversight. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that reports are completed accurately and the person reviewing the report should compare information reported to the supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2024-001: Significant Deficiency Economic Adjustment Assistance – 11.307 – Reporting Criteria Federal reporting requirements require all reports to be completed accurately. Condition One report was not accurately completed. Cause The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that the reports were completed accurately. Effect One report was completed inaccurately, resulting in noncompliance with reporting requirements. Questioned Costs These errors noted were due to missing two loans on the report. No questioned costs. Context Two reports were selected for testing – ED-209 and ED-917. Only the ED-917 report contained errors. With the ED-917 report, the reporting period was for July 2023 to June 2024, but two loans from late 2023 were not included in the report due to management oversight. Repeat Finding No. Recommendation The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that reports are completed accurately and the person reviewing the report should compare information reported to the supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person – Ann Joppru, Finance Director Corrective Action Plan – The Organization will implement procedures to ensure that reports are completed accurately and the person reviewing the report will compare information reported to the supporting documentation. Completion Date - Immediately

About Reporting →

FY 2023-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,644,815 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on July 12, 2024 — management decision was due January 12, 2025.

2023-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

One invoice tested was paid twice and charged to the federal program through the indirect cost allocation. Cause: The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that duplicate invoices are caught and not paid twice. Effect: Duplicate indirect cost was charged to this federal program through the indirect cost allocation. Questioned Costs: None. This error noted was for an invoice selected from the indirect cost pool. There were a lot more eligible indirect costs. Context: A sample of 42 invoice transactions were selected for testing this federal program. Only one invoice tested was paid twice. It was paid originally via credit card, then a zero-balance invoice was paid later via check. No other errors were noted. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that all invoices are properly reviewed to ensure that duplicate invoices are not paid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Criteria: The Uniform Guidance Basic Guidelines for Allowable Costs requires that charges to federal awards be necessary and reasonable for the performance of the federal award and be allocable thereto under the principles of 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E. Condition: One invoice tested was paid twice and charged to the federal program through the indirect cost allocation. Cause: The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that duplicate invoices are caught and not paid twice. Effect: Duplicate indirect cost was charged to this federal program through the indirect cost allocation. Questioned Costs: None. This error noted was for an invoice selected from the indirect cost pool. There were a lot more eligible indirect costs. Context: A sample of 42 invoice transactions were selected for testing this federal program. Only one invoice tested was paid twice. It was paid originally via credit card, then a zero-balance invoice was paid later via check. No other errors were noted. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that all invoices are properly reviewed to ensure that duplicate invoices are not paid. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions: The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Corrective Action Plan

Contact Person – Ann Joppru, Finance Director Corrective Action Plan – The Organization will implement procedures to ensure that all invoices are properly reviewed to ensure that duplicate invoices are not paid. Completion Date - Immediately

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →

FY 2022-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$7,428,408 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 28, 2023 — management decision was due December 28, 2023.

2022-001
Activities Allowed or Unallowed / Cost Allowability
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

2022-001: Significant Deficiency Economic Adjustment Assistance ? 11.307 ? Allowable Costs / Activities Criteria The Uniform Guidance requires charges to federal awards to be approved by the Organization and these approvals need to be documented. Condition One invoice tested was missing the approval documentation. Cause The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that approvals are documented for all expenses charged to grants. Effect One invoice charged to this federal program was missing the approval documentation. Questioned Costs None Context A sample of 46 transactions were selected for testing this federal program. Only one transaction tested was missing the approval documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that all expenses are approved and this approval documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001: Significant Deficiency Economic Adjustment Assistance ? 11.307 ? Allowable Costs / Activities Criteria The Uniform Guidance requires charges to federal awards to be approved by the Organization and these approvals need to be documented. Condition One invoice tested was missing the approval documentation. Cause The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that approvals are documented for all expenses charged to grants. Effect One invoice charged to this federal program was missing the approval documentation. Questioned Costs None Context A sample of 46 transactions were selected for testing this federal program. Only one transaction tested was missing the approval documentation. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that all expenses are approved and this approval documentation is maintained. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-001 FINDING Contact Person ? Kalen Wiseth, Finance Director Corrective Action Plan ? The Organization will implement procedures to ensure that all expenses are approved and this approval documentation is maintained. Completion Date - Immediately

About Activities Allowed or Unallowed, Allowable Costs / Cost Principles →
2022-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

Economic Adjustment Assistance ? 11.307 ? Reporting Criteria Federal reporting requirements require all reports to be completed accurately. Condition A few errors were noted on two reports submitted for this grant. Cause The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that the reports were completed accurately. Effect Two reports were completed inaccurately, resulting in noncompliance with reporting requirements. Questioned Costs None Context Eleven reports were selected for testing. Only two reports tested ? ED-209 and ED-917 contained errors. With the ED-209 report, the Organization had a keying error where one loan issued was entered as $140,000 instead of $1,400,000, resulting in the understatement of Total Dollars Leveraged line item. With the ED-917 report, the reporting period was for July 2021 to June 2022, but loans from June 2021 were included in the report due to spreadsheet formula errors. The Organization contacted their Grantor and was able to correct the report and resubmit. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that reports are completed accurately and the person reviewing the report should compare information reported to the supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Economic Adjustment Assistance ? 11.307 ? Reporting Criteria Federal reporting requirements require all reports to be completed accurately. Condition A few errors were noted on two reports submitted for this grant. Cause The Organization did not have sufficient procedures in place to ensure that the reports were completed accurately. Effect Two reports were completed inaccurately, resulting in noncompliance with reporting requirements. Questioned Costs None Context Eleven reports were selected for testing. Only two reports tested ? ED-209 and ED-917 contained errors. With the ED-209 report, the Organization had a keying error where one loan issued was entered as $140,000 instead of $1,400,000, resulting in the understatement of Total Dollars Leveraged line item. With the ED-917 report, the reporting period was for July 2021 to June 2022, but loans from June 2021 were included in the report due to spreadsheet formula errors. The Organization contacted their Grantor and was able to correct the report and resubmit. Repeat Finding No Recommendation The Organization should implement procedures to ensure that reports are completed accurately and the person reviewing the report should compare information reported to the supporting documentation. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Actions The Organization agrees with the recommendation and will implement immediately.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-002 FINDING Contact Person ? Kalen Wiseth, Finance Director Corrective Action Plan ? The Organization will implement procedures to ensure that reports are completed accurately and the person reviewing the report will compare information reported to the supporting documentation. Completion Date - Immediately

About Reporting →

FY 2021-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,844,056 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2022 — management decision was due December 29, 2022.

FY 2020-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$8,238,269 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 29, 2021 — management decision was due December 29, 2021.

FY 2019-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,381,587 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 28, 2020 — management decision was due January 28, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,370,703 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 1, 2019 — management decision was due January 1, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,300,493 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on July 10, 2018 — management decision was due January 10, 2019.

FY 2016-12-31

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$5,076,735 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on June 20, 2017 — management decision was due December 20, 2017.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.