← Back to home

EVELETH - VIRGINIA AIRPORT AUTHORITYLocal Government

EIN: 410858457

UEI: GSA_MIGRATION

Audited by: WALKER, GIROUX, & HAHNE

Oversight agency: 20 [Department of Transportation]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 7, 2026

EVELETH - VIRGINIA AIRPORT AUTHORITY2 audit years3 findings1 repeat
2
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
1
Repeat Findings
$1.1M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2020)

FY 2020-12-31

NON-GAAP BASIS$1,134,352 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on July 11, 2021. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by January 11, 2022 (1707 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
Funder? Track this deadline →
2020-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESSREPEAT OF 2019-001

2020-001. SEGREGATION OF DUTIES Criteria The concentration of duties and responsibilities in a limited number of individuals is not desirable from an internal accounting control point of view. Condition Due to the limited number of personnel within the Authority?s accounting office, the segregation of accounting functions necessary to ensure adequate internal accounting control is not possible. Effect Because of the weakness in segregation of duties, the Authority has not provided adequate internal control. Cause This occurred because of staffing limitations caused by fiscal constraints. Recommendations Authority board members should constantly be aware of this condition, attempt to segregate duties as much as possible, and provide oversight to partially compensate for this deficiency. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the audit finding. The Authority Board will continue to monitor all transactions and will structure the duties of office personnel to help ensure as much segregation of duties as possible within the Authority?s staffing limitations and funding constraints.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2020-001. SEGREGATION OF DUTIES Criteria The concentration of duties and responsibilities in a limited number of individuals is not desirable from an internal accounting control point of view. Condition Due to the limited number of personnel within the Authority?s accounting office, the segregation of accounting functions necessary to ensure adequate internal accounting control is not possible. Effect Because of the weakness in segregation of duties, the Authority has not provided adequate internal control. Cause This occurred because of staffing limitations caused by fiscal constraints. Recommendations Authority board members should constantly be aware of this condition, attempt to segregate duties as much as possible, and provide oversight to partially compensate for this deficiency. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the audit finding. The Authority Board will continue to monitor all transactions and will structure the duties of office personnel to help ensure as much segregation of duties as possible within the Authority?s staffing limitations and funding constraints.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Planned Management will attempt to monitor transactions and structure the duties of office personnel to help ensure as much segregation of duties as possible within the Authority?s staffing limitations and funding constraints.

Prior Finding References

2019-001

About Other →

FY 2019-12-31

NON-GAAP BASISMATERIAL NONCOMPLIANCE DISCLOSED$1,550,940 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2020 — management decision was due March 29, 2021.

2019-001
Other
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

2019-001. SEGREGATION OF DUTIES Criteria The concentration of duties and responsibilities in a limited number of individuals is not desirable from an internal accounting control point of view. Condition Due to the limited number of personnel within the Authority?s accounting office, the segregation of accounting functions necessary to ensure adequate internal accounting control is not possible. Effect Because of the weakness in segregation of duties, the Authority has not provided adequate internal control. Cause This occurred because of staffing limitations caused by fiscal constraints. Recommendations Authority board members should constantly be aware of this condition, attempt to segregate duties as much as possible, and provide oversight to partially compensate for this deficiency. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the audit finding. The Authority Board will continue to monitor all transactions and will structure the duties of office personnel to help ensure as much segregation of duties as possible within the Authority?s staffing limitations and funding constraints.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-001. SEGREGATION OF DUTIES Criteria The concentration of duties and responsibilities in a limited number of individuals is not desirable from an internal accounting control point of view. Condition Due to the limited number of personnel within the Authority?s accounting office, the segregation of accounting functions necessary to ensure adequate internal accounting control is not possible. Effect Because of the weakness in segregation of duties, the Authority has not provided adequate internal control. Cause This occurred because of staffing limitations caused by fiscal constraints. Recommendations Authority board members should constantly be aware of this condition, attempt to segregate duties as much as possible, and provide oversight to partially compensate for this deficiency. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the audit finding. The Authority Board will continue to monitor all transactions and will structure the duties of office personnel to help ensure as much segregation of duties as possible within the Authority?s staffing limitations and funding constraints.

Corrective Action Plan

The Authority?s Board will continue to monitor all transactions and will structure the duties of office personnel to help ensure as much segregation of duties as possible within the Authority?s staffing limitations and funding constraints.

About Other →
2019-003
Cash Management
MATERIAL WEAKNESS

2019-003. NONCOMPLIANCE OF CASH MANAGEMENT - REIMBURSEMENT FROM TWO SOURCES Criteria The same invoices/expenditures should not be submitted to two different funding agencies for reimbursement (also known as ?double dipping?). Condition The same invoice/expenditures were submitted for reimbursement from the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB) and from an Airport Improvement Program grant. When the IRRRB funding was received in 2019, there was $97,247 worth of grant receipts for which the Authority had not yet incurred eligible grant expenditures. At December 31, 2019, grant receipts received over total related project expenditures was $59,004. Effect The Authority received funding from two different sources for the same invoices/expenditures (double dipped). The Authority was not in compliance with cash management grant requirements and the Authority would either have a payable to the IRRRB or deferred revenue at December 31, 2019 as there weren?t enough unreimbursed expenditures to match the grant revenues received. Cause This occurred because the Secretary submitted the same invoice to two different grant agencies and controls to prevent this double dipping were insufficient. Recommendations We recommend the Authority submit new invoices/expenditure backup to the IRRRB for invoices/expenditures that were not already reimbursed by the Airport Improvement Program grant. The Authority?s board should review/update their procedures to ensure controls are in place to prevent requesting reimbursement for the same expenditures from two different funding sources. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the audit finding. The Authority will submit new invoices/expenditure backup to the IRRRB for expenditures that were not already reimbursed by the Airport Improvement Program grant and the Authority?s board will update procedures to ensure their controls will prevent similar reporting errors.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2019-003. NONCOMPLIANCE OF CASH MANAGEMENT - REIMBURSEMENT FROM TWO SOURCES Criteria The same invoices/expenditures should not be submitted to two different funding agencies for reimbursement (also known as ?double dipping?). Condition The same invoice/expenditures were submitted for reimbursement from the Iron Range Resources and Rehabilitation Board (IRRRB) and from an Airport Improvement Program grant. When the IRRRB funding was received in 2019, there was $97,247 worth of grant receipts for which the Authority had not yet incurred eligible grant expenditures. At December 31, 2019, grant receipts received over total related project expenditures was $59,004. Effect The Authority received funding from two different sources for the same invoices/expenditures (double dipped). The Authority was not in compliance with cash management grant requirements and the Authority would either have a payable to the IRRRB or deferred revenue at December 31, 2019 as there weren?t enough unreimbursed expenditures to match the grant revenues received. Cause This occurred because the Secretary submitted the same invoice to two different grant agencies and controls to prevent this double dipping were insufficient. Recommendations We recommend the Authority submit new invoices/expenditure backup to the IRRRB for invoices/expenditures that were not already reimbursed by the Airport Improvement Program grant. The Authority?s board should review/update their procedures to ensure controls are in place to prevent requesting reimbursement for the same expenditures from two different funding sources. Views of Responsible Officials and Planned Corrective Action Management agrees with the audit finding. The Authority will submit new invoices/expenditure backup to the IRRRB for expenditures that were not already reimbursed by the Airport Improvement Program grant and the Authority?s board will update procedures to ensure their controls will prevent similar reporting errors.

Corrective Action Plan

The Authority will submit new invoices/expenditure backup to the IRRRB for expenditures that were not already reimbursed by the Airport Improvement Program grant and the Authority?s board will update procedures to ensure their controls will prevent similar reporting errors.

About Cash Management →

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.

Checking several at once? Portfolio view →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.