← Back to home

Crown CollegeHigher Education

EIN: 410693968

UEI: UHMRTL7ASH37

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Crown College10 audit years11 findings2 repeat
10
Audit Years
11
Total Findings
2
Repeat Findings
$9.3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,310,731 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on March 24, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 24, 2026 (25 days from today).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,561,906 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 21, 2024 — management decision was due May 21, 2025.

2024-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing, we noted four of the 40 student's enrollment date per NSLDS did not match the school's effective date per their records. Furthermore, one out of 40 student's program enrollment effective date did not match their enrollment effective date. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted the College does not have a process in place to ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the student who withdrew were reported timely and accurately. Effect: The College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely and accurately. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the College review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster ALN Numbers: Various Award Period: July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: * Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance * Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 requires that enrollment status changes for students be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or within 60 days if the student with the status change will be reported on a scheduled transmission within 60 days of the change in status. Regulations require the status include an accurate effective date. In addition, regulations require that an institution make necessary corrections and return the records within 10 days for any roster files that don’t pass the NSLDS enrollment reporting edits. Condition: During our testing, we noted four of the 40 student's enrollment date per NSLDS did not match the school's effective date per their records. Furthermore, one out of 40 student's program enrollment effective date did not match their enrollment effective date. Questioned Costs: None. Context: During our testing, it was noted the College does not have a process in place to ensure timeliness and accuracy of NSLDS reporting. Cause: The College did not have a process in place to ensure the student who withdrew were reported timely and accurately. Effect: The College did not comply with Department of Education (ED) regulations by reporting student enrollment status changes timely and accurately. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend the College review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Views of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS) Enrollment Reporting Award Period: July 1, 2023 to June 30, 2024 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Recommendation: We recommend the College review its reporting procedures to ensure that students’ statuses are accurately and timely reported to NSLDS as required by regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: The Financial Aid Office will further collaborate and expand procedures with the Registrar office to continue to ensure that we meet the Code of Federal Regulations, 34 CFR 685.309 that requires enrollment status changes to be reported to NSLDS within 30 days or 60 days if scheduled enrollment transmission will be sent within 60 days. Specifically, adjusting procedure to ensure that all 0.0 GPA students due to F grade are reported. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Alyssa Gillette Planned completion date for corrective action plan: November 30, 2024

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$10,345,778 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on December 7, 2023 — management decision was due June 7, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,064,181 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on March 26, 2023 — management decision was due September 26, 2023.

2022-001
Procurement & Suspension/Debarment
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing, it was noted that the College did not have a procurement policy that contained certain required elements nor did they perform all the required procurement procedures related to the HEERF expenditures. Also, it was noted during testing that there is no written policy that requires the College to verify that vendors are suspended or debarred nor did they perform any procedures related to the HEERF expenditures on such vendors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The College did not have appropriate documentation that met the procurement, and suspension and debarment federal requirements. Furthermore, they did not have written policies in place at time of procurement or entering into contracts with vendors that aligned with the uniform guidance. Cause: The College was unaware of this federal requirement since it is their first federal grant that was non-student financial aid. Effect: All requirements were met, but it is also required that the policies be documented in a written form. Without written policies it is likely that required steps in the process may be missed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College review their Procurement and Suspension and debarment policies and ensure that any missing federal requirements are included in their written policies. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2022-001 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) Procurement, Suspension and Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: HEERF Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Award Period: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance - Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Title 2, Subtitle A, Chapter 2 Part 200, Subpart D, section 200.318 of the Code of Federal Regulations requires Colleges to have a written procurement policy that includes certain requirements as it relates to procuring goods and services using federal dollars. Additionally, 2 CFR 180.995 requires that the College has a written policy where Colleges should perform a check to ensure vendors are not debarred. Condition: During our testing, it was noted that the College did not have a procurement policy that contained certain required elements nor did they perform all the required procurement procedures related to the HEERF expenditures. Also, it was noted during testing that there is no written policy that requires the College to verify that vendors are suspended or debarred nor did they perform any procedures related to the HEERF expenditures on such vendors. Questioned Costs: None Context: The College did not have appropriate documentation that met the procurement, and suspension and debarment federal requirements. Furthermore, they did not have written policies in place at time of procurement or entering into contracts with vendors that aligned with the uniform guidance. Cause: The College was unaware of this federal requirement since it is their first federal grant that was non-student financial aid. Effect: All requirements were met, but it is also required that the policies be documented in a written form. Without written policies it is likely that required steps in the process may be missed. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College review their Procurement and Suspension and debarment policies and ensure that any missing federal requirements are included in their written policies. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2022-001 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (Procurement/Suspension and Debarment) Award Period: July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Compliance, Other Matter Recommendation: We recommend that the College review their Procurement and Suspension and debarment policies and ensure that any missing federal requirements are included in their written policies. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Crown College will review their Procurement and Suspension and debarment policies and ensure that any missing federal requirements are included in their written policies. The Chief Operating Officer and the Controller will collaborate in this effort. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Ron Straka Planned completion date for corrective action plan: May 31, 2023

About Procurement and Suspension and Debarment →

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,567,860 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2022 — management decision was due March 25, 2023.

2021-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our testing of the reporting process, we noted: 1. The College was unable to provide the 45 Day Report and September 30, 2020, student quarterly report. 2. The December 31, 2020 and March 30, 2021, student and institutional quarterly report was not updated as they had no expenditures during such periods. Based on the guidance, institutions are required to upload reports for each quarter even if the total are zero or unchanged unless the report was indicated as "FINAL" thus all expenditures (HEERF I-III) had been spent. Questioned Costs: None Context: A control system to prevent and detect errors in the reporting process was not created at the time the reports were filed. Cause: The College did not have someone tracking the requirements to ensure that they posted the reporting timely and accurately. Effect: There was inaccurate reporting on the College?s website. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College establish a system to track due dates of reports to ensure timely submission. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

2021-001 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (HEERF) Reporting Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Education Federal Program Title: HEERF Assistance Listing Number: 84.425 Award Period: July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 Type of Finding: - Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance - Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Per Uniform Guidance 2 CFR 200.303, non-federal entities receiving federal awards are required to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with federal laws, regulations and program compliance requirements. The initial reporting for this grant requires the report to be submitted to the Institution?s website within 30 days of the signed Certification Agreement or 30 days after the electronic announcement dated May 6, whichever is later. Institutions were then required to update their websites every 45 days after initial upload. This was changed to quarterly on August 31, 2020. Condition: During our testing of the reporting process, we noted: 1. The College was unable to provide the 45 Day Report and September 30, 2020, student quarterly report. 2. The December 31, 2020 and March 30, 2021, student and institutional quarterly report was not updated as they had no expenditures during such periods. Based on the guidance, institutions are required to upload reports for each quarter even if the total are zero or unchanged unless the report was indicated as "FINAL" thus all expenditures (HEERF I-III) had been spent. Questioned Costs: None Context: A control system to prevent and detect errors in the reporting process was not created at the time the reports were filed. Cause: The College did not have someone tracking the requirements to ensure that they posted the reporting timely and accurately. Effect: There was inaccurate reporting on the College?s website. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the College establish a system to track due dates of reports to ensure timely submission. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

2021-001 Higher Education Emergency Relief Funds (Reporting) Award Period: July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Compliance, Other Matter Recommendation: We recommend the College establish a system to track due dates of reports to ensure timely submission. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Crown College will establish a system to track due dates of reports to ensure timely submission. The Director of Financial Aid and the Controller will collaborate in this effort. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Ron Straka Planned completion date for corrective action plan: October 1, 2022

About Reporting →

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,247,614 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on June 16, 2021 — management decision was due December 16, 2021.

2020-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCY

The College utilizes University Accounting Service, LLC (UAS) for its third-party Perkins Loan servicing. This is a very common practice for colleges and universities in order to provide the most efficient and effective means to not only collect loans but meet the federal regulations for servicing student Perkins Loans. In auditing the compliance features for the loan servicing, CliftonLarsonAllen utilizes the external compliance report performed for UAS by other auditors. We noted within the UAS compliance audit report for the year ended June 30, 2020, there was a finding for not contacting the student within the required timeframes. The audit did not specify the students that were not contacted within the required guidelines and UAS is one of the largest third-party servicer for federal student loans. Therefore, we do not know if there were any Crown College students that were impacted by the noncompliance noted at UAS. Questioned Costs: None Context: We noted the College?s third-party servicer compliance audit noted that of the fifty students tested, two students were sent past due notices late and one student was not sent the proper past due notices. Cause: UAS, the third-party servicer, did not have controls in place to ensure they complied with Department of Education Rules and Regulations in regards to timely engagement with students with federal loans. Given Crown College relies on UAS to meet their compliance responsibilities and there was not testing completed specifically for Crown College to determine if the noncompliance is specific to them, this is a finding for the College. Effect: UAS is not in compliance with all statutory or regulatory provisions as it pertains to the notification of students exiting its grace period. Any finding UAS receives that is not mitigated with additional testing (with results of no errors specific to the college or university), that finding becomes a finding of the institutions they service. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College implement a thorough review process of all third-party servicer contracts to make sure they comply with all Department of Education Rules and Regulations. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA Numbers: 84.038 ? Federal Perkins Loans Award Period: July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement: The Code of Federal Regulation, 34 CFR 674.43 requires a servicer to send a first overdue notice within 15 days after the due date of the payment if the servicer has not received a payment, a request for deferment or a request for postponement or for cancellation. Further, a servicer shall send a second overdue notice within 30 days after the first overdue notice is sent and a final demand letter within 15 days after the second overdue notice. This letter must inform the borrower that unless the institution receives a payment or a request for deferment, postponement, or cancellation within 30 days of the date of the letter, it will refer the account for collection or litigation, and will report the default to a credit bureau. Condition: The College utilizes University Accounting Service, LLC (UAS) for its third-party Perkins Loan servicing. This is a very common practice for colleges and universities in order to provide the most efficient and effective means to not only collect loans but meet the federal regulations for servicing student Perkins Loans. In auditing the compliance features for the loan servicing, CliftonLarsonAllen utilizes the external compliance report performed for UAS by other auditors. We noted within the UAS compliance audit report for the year ended June 30, 2020, there was a finding for not contacting the student within the required timeframes. The audit did not specify the students that were not contacted within the required guidelines and UAS is one of the largest third-party servicer for federal student loans. Therefore, we do not know if there were any Crown College students that were impacted by the noncompliance noted at UAS. Questioned Costs: None Context: We noted the College?s third-party servicer compliance audit noted that of the fifty students tested, two students were sent past due notices late and one student was not sent the proper past due notices. Cause: UAS, the third-party servicer, did not have controls in place to ensure they complied with Department of Education Rules and Regulations in regards to timely engagement with students with federal loans. Given Crown College relies on UAS to meet their compliance responsibilities and there was not testing completed specifically for Crown College to determine if the noncompliance is specific to them, this is a finding for the College. Effect: UAS is not in compliance with all statutory or regulatory provisions as it pertains to the notification of students exiting its grace period. Any finding UAS receives that is not mitigated with additional testing (with results of no errors specific to the college or university), that finding becomes a finding of the institutions they service. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend that the College implement a thorough review process of all third-party servicer contracts to make sure they comply with all Department of Education Rules and Regulations. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Department of Education Crown College respectfully submits the following corrective action plan for the year June 30, 2020. Audit period: July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020 The finding from the schedule of findings and questioned costs is discussed below. The finding is numbered consistently with the numbers assigned in the schedule. FINDINGS- Federal Award Programs Audit Department of Education Past Due Notices Sent Untimely or Not Sent 84.038 Recommendation: We recommend that the College implement a thorough review process of all third-party servicer contracts to make sure they comply with all Department of Education Rules and Regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Crown College will develop and implement a thorough review process of third-party servicer contracts having potential financial aid implications. The Director of Financial Aid and the Senior Accountant will complete periodic reviews to ensure third-party servicers comply with all Department of Education Rules.and Regulations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Gary Thompson Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 1, 2021 If the Department of Education has questions regarding this plan, please call Gary Thompson at (952) 446-4125.

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,004,098 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 5, 2019 — management decision was due May 5, 2020.

2019-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The College utilizes University Accounting Service, LLC (UAS) for its third-party Perkins Loan servicing. This is a very common practice for colleges and universities in order to provide the most efficient and effective means to not only collect loans but meet the federal regulations for servicing student Perkins Loans. In auditing the compliance features for the loan servicing, CliftonLarsonAllen utilizes the external compliance report performed for UAS by other auditors. We noted within the UAS compliance audit report for the year ended June 30, 2019, there was a finding for not contacting the student within the required timeframes. The audit did not specify the students that were not contacted within the required guidelines and UAS is one of the largest third-party servicer for federal student loans. Therefore, we do not know if there were any Crown College students that were impacted by the noncompliance noted at UAS. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted the College?s third-party servicer, UAS, failed to comply with notifying students of their grace period as required noting 2 of 50 students were noncompliant. Cause: UAS, the third-party servicer, did not have controls in place to ensure they complied with Department of Education Rules and Regulations in regards to timely engagement with students with federal loans. Given Crown College relies on UAS to meet their compliance responsibilities and there was not testing completed specifically for Crown College to determine if the noncompliance is specific to them, this is a finding for the College. Effect: UAS is not in compliance with all statutory or regulatory provisions as it pertains to the notification of students exiting its grace period. Any finding UAS receives that is not mitigated with additional testing (with results of no errors specific to the college or university), that finding becomes a finding of the institutions they service. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the College implement a thorough review process of all third-party servicer contracts to make sure they comply with all Department of Education Rules and Regulations. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Grace Period Notification Federal Agency: Department of Education Federal Program: Title: Student Financial Assistance Cluster CFDA Numbers: 84.038 Award Criteria or Specific Requirement: Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance Period: July1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 The Code of Federal Regulation, 34 CFR 674.42 requires contact to a borrower for the first time 90 days after the commencement of any grace period. The College at this time shall remind the borrower of his or her responsibility to comply with the terms of the loan. The College is then required at 150 days and 240 days to send subsequent notices to notify the borrower of the first required payment. Condition: The College utilizes University Accounting Service, LLC (UAS) for its third-party Perkins Loan servicing. This is a very common practice for colleges and universities in order to provide the most efficient and effective means to not only collect loans but meet the federal regulations for servicing student Perkins Loans. In auditing the compliance features for the loan servicing, CliftonLarsonAllen utilizes the external compliance report performed for UAS by other auditors. We noted within the UAS compliance audit report for the year ended June 30, 2019, there was a finding for not contacting the student within the required timeframes. The audit did not specify the students that were not contacted within the required guidelines and UAS is one of the largest third-party servicer for federal student loans. Therefore, we do not know if there were any Crown College students that were impacted by the noncompliance noted at UAS. Questioned Costs: None. Context: We noted the College?s third-party servicer, UAS, failed to comply with notifying students of their grace period as required noting 2 of 50 students were noncompliant. Cause: UAS, the third-party servicer, did not have controls in place to ensure they complied with Department of Education Rules and Regulations in regards to timely engagement with students with federal loans. Given Crown College relies on UAS to meet their compliance responsibilities and there was not testing completed specifically for Crown College to determine if the noncompliance is specific to them, this is a finding for the College. Effect: UAS is not in compliance with all statutory or regulatory provisions as it pertains to the notification of students exiting its grace period. Any finding UAS receives that is not mitigated with additional testing (with results of no errors specific to the college or university), that finding becomes a finding of the institutions they service. Repeat Finding: No. Recommendation: We recommend that the College implement a thorough review process of all third-party servicer contracts to make sure they comply with all Department of Education Rules and Regulations. View of Responsible Official: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Grace Period Notifications 84.038 Recommendation: It was recommended the College designate implement a thorough review process of all third-party servicer contracts to make sure they comply with all Department of Education Rules and Regulations. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to finding: Crown College will develop and implement an in-depth review process of all third-party servicer contracts. This process will include members from both the Financial Aid and Finance Offices. Specific to this finding, the Senior Accountant will complete periodic reviews to ensure third-party servicers are in compliance all Department of Education Rules and Regulations. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Gary Thompson Planned completion date for corrective action plan: December 1, 2019

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$12,263,213 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 16, 2018 — management decision was due April 16, 2019.

2018-001
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2017-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$11,505,451 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2017 — management decision was due April 30, 2018.

2017-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2017-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2016-003OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2016-003

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2016-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$9,488,523 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2016 — management decision was due May 1, 2017.

2016-002
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →
2016-003
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2015-002OTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

Prior Finding References

2015-002

About Reporting →
2016-004
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Special Tests and Provisions →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.