← Back to home

Amherst H. Wilder FoundationNon-Profit

EIN: 410693889

UEI: TMVEMEJYWEA5

Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP

Oversight agency: 14 [Department of Housing and Urban Development]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of September 2, 2026

Amherst H. Wilder Foundation10 audit years3 findings
10
Audit Years
3
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$3M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2025)

FY 2025-06-30

$2,975,718 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on December 11, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by June 11, 2026 (84 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2025-002
Special Tests & Provisions
MATERIAL WEAKNESSMODIFIED OPINION

During our audit testing, we noted rent reasonableness documentation was not performed or performed after the rent expenses were paid. Context: During our testing 7 out of the 8 selections either did not have a rent calculation form filled out or the form was completed after the rent was paid. Questioned Costs: Unknown Cause: Procedures were not in place to fill out the rent calculation form. Effect: Rent paid may not be reasonable or in line with requirements. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: CLA recommends that a policy is put in place to document the rent reasonableness procedures as well as documented review. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development Federal Program Name: Continuum of Care Program Assistance Listing Number: 14.267 Federal Award Identification Numbers: MN0048L5K012316, MN0269L5K012211, MN0269L5K012312 Award Periods: 7/1/2024 – 6/30/2025, 1/1/2024 – 12/31/2024, 1/1/2025 – 12/31/2025 Type of Finding: • Material Weakness in Internal Control over Compliance • Material Noncompliance (Qualified Opinion) Criteria or specific requirement: Where grants are used to pay for rent for all or a part of a structure, the rent paid must be reasonable in relation to rents being charged in the area for comparable space. In addition, the rent may not exceed rents currently being charged by the same owner for comparable unassisted space (24 CFR 578.49(b)(1) and 24 CFR 578.51(g)) Condition: During our audit testing, we noted rent reasonableness documentation was not performed or performed after the rent expenses were paid. Context: During our testing 7 out of the 8 selections either did not have a rent calculation form filled out or the form was completed after the rent was paid. Questioned Costs: Unknown Cause: Procedures were not in place to fill out the rent calculation form. Effect: Rent paid may not be reasonable or in line with requirements. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: CLA recommends that a policy is put in place to document the rent reasonableness procedures as well as documented review. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: CLA recommends that a policy is put in place to document the rent reasonableness procedures as well as documented review. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to the finding: The Rent Reasonableness Policy was updated in July 2025 to clearly require that verification be completed and documented before any rent payment. Each unit must now be compared to at least two similar unassisted units using reliable public sources, with supporting evidence uploaded to the participant’s electronic file. A comprehensive review of all ROOF Project files for placements made after July 1, 2023, has been completed, and all missing documentation has been corrected. Staff received refresher training in August 2025, and all housing specialists are required to complete a HUD Exchange training on rent reasonableness standards by November 2025. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Jacqueline Jones, Director Family Supportive Housing Planned completion date for corrective action plan: July 2025

About Special Tests and Provisions →
2025-003
Eligibility
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

During our audit testing, we noted that the sliding fee scale was not being accurately followed in some instances. Context: During our testing 2 out of 30 selections did not use the correct sliding scale fee based on information provided by the client. The patients were charged $0 instead of a required $5 fee. Cause: Personnel did not calculate the correct fee based on the sliding fee scale. Effect: Participants would not be charged the correct fee based on the sliding fee scale. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: CLA recommends training employees to review the sliding fee scale carefully to ensure the appropriate fee is charged. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Federal Agency: Department of Health and Human Services Federal Program Name: Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Expansion Grants Assistance Listing Number: 93.696 Federal Award Identification Numbers: 1H79SM088933 and 5H79SM088933-02 Award Periods: 9/30/2023 – 9/29/2024 and 9/30/2024 – 9/29/2025 Type of Finding: • Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance • Other Matters Criteria or specific requirement: CCBHCs are required to utilize a sliding fee scale that ensures that services to patients are not denied or limited due to an individual's inability to pay for services. Wilder has established a sliding fee policy and schedule based on current federal poverty guidelines. Condition: During our audit testing, we noted that the sliding fee scale was not being accurately followed in some instances. Context: During our testing 2 out of 30 selections did not use the correct sliding scale fee based on information provided by the client. The patients were charged $0 instead of a required $5 fee. Cause: Personnel did not calculate the correct fee based on the sliding fee scale. Effect: Participants would not be charged the correct fee based on the sliding fee scale. Repeat finding: Not a repeat finding Recommendation: CLA recommends training employees to review the sliding fee scale carefully to ensure the appropriate fee is charged. Views of responsible officials: There is no disagreement with the audit finding.

Corrective Action Plan

Recommendation: CLA recommends training employees to review the sliding fee scale carefully to ensure the appropriate fee is charged. Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action taken in response to the finding: Application process was standardized across CMHW, with an added layer of reviewal by the financial manager before billing manager enters sliding fee into Carelogic. Training was provided for staff involved. Name(s) of the contact person(s) responsible for corrective action: Ben Jewett, Senior Financial Manager Planned completion date for corrective action plan: 10/13/2025 If the Cognizant or Oversight Agency has questions regarding this plan, please call Dawn Mueller at 651-280-2419.

About Eligibility →

FY 2024-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,889,324 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 28, 2024 — management decision was due April 28, 2025.

FY 2023-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,283,142 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on January 8, 2024 — management decision was due July 8, 2024.

FY 2022-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$3,043,692 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 27, 2022 — management decision was due April 27, 2023.

FY 2021-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,610,659 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 24, 2021 — management decision was due April 24, 2022.

FY 2020-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$1,733,083 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 22, 2020 — management decision was due April 22, 2021.

FY 2019-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,321,268 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 30, 2019 — management decision was due April 30, 2020.

FY 2018-06-30

LOW-RISK AUDITEE$2,182,822 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on October 22, 2018 — management decision was due April 22, 2019.

FY 2017-06-30

$2,309,717 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on November 1, 2017 — management decision was due May 1, 2018.

FY 2016-06-30

$2,439,678 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on October 17, 2016 — management decision was due April 17, 2017.

2016-002
Period of Performance
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Period of Performance →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Minnesota

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.