← Back to home

DEERFIELD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICTLocal Government

EIN: 396031550

UEI: FQYST99QJYC1

Audited by: JOHNSON BLOCK & COMPANY, INC.

Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

DEERFIELD COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT3 audit years4 findings3 repeat
3
Audit Years
4
Total Findings
3
Repeat Findings
$851.6K
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-06-30

$851,634 federal awards expended

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on January 9, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by July 9, 2025 (417 days ago).

What is a management decision? →
2024-001
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2023-001

The responsibility for the District’s bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be cost prohibitive and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District’s finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day-to-day financial transactions.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding #2024-001 – Lack of Segregation of Duties Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide adequate segregation of duties and reduce overlapping accounting functions, especially in cash receipts and disbursements. In addition, those functions should be segregated from those overseeing overall finances. Condition: The responsibility for the District’s bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be cost prohibitive and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District’s finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day-to-day financial transactions.

Corrective Action Plan

Finding #2024-001 - Lack of Segregation of Duties Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide adequate segregation of duties and reduce overlapping accounting functions, especially in cash receipts and disbursements. In addition, those functions should be segregated from those overseeing overall finances. Condition: The responsibility for the District's bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be cost prohibitive and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District's finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day-to-day financial transactions. Contact Person: Doreen Treuden Anticipated Completion: Not Applicable

Prior Finding References

2023-001

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2023-06-30

$868,131 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on December 8, 2023 — management decision was due June 8, 2024.

2023-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2022-001

The responsibility for the District’s bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be too costly and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District’s finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day to day financial transactions.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding #2023-001 – Lack of Segregation of Duties Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide adequate segregation of duties and reduce overlapping accounting functions, especially in cash receipts and disbursements. In addition, those functions should be segregated from those overseeing overall finances. Condition: The responsibility for the District’s bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be too costly and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District’s finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day to day financial transactions.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-001 Lack of Segregation of Duties Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide adequate segregation of duties and reduce overlapping accounting functions, especially in cash receipts and disbursements. In addition, those functions should be segregated from those overseeing overall finances. Condition: The responsibility for the District's bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be too costly and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District's finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day to day financial transactions. Contact Person: Doreen Treuden Anticipated Completion: Not Applicable

Prior Finding References

2022-001

About Other →
2023-002
Special Tests & Provisions
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

There was one Education Stabilization Fund construction project performed by a subcontractor. Grant expenditures for the project paid by the Education Stabilization Fund totaled $34,828. There was not a prevailing wage clause in the contract and certified payrolls were not received. Cause: The District was not aware that wage rate requirements applied to the construction project until after it was completed. Effect: A reimbursement request was made for expenditures that did not comply with wage rate requirements. Questioned Costs: $34,828. Recommendation: Establish controls to comply with wage rate requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund. Consider determining if the contractor performing the project in 2022-2023 paid prevailing wage rates for costs reimbursed by the grant. Otherwise, the District should replace the cost with other allowable costs. Response: The District replaced the cost with other allowable costs.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Finding #2023-002 – #84.425D COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund II Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Award Number: 2022-131309-DPI-ESSERFII-163 Pass-through Entity: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Criteria: Wage rate requirements apply to the Education Stabilization Fund when laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors work on construction contracts more than $2,000. Laborer must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL). Nonfederal entities shall include in their contracts subject to wage rate requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor complies with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the District weekly payrolls and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition: There was one Education Stabilization Fund construction project performed by a subcontractor. Grant expenditures for the project paid by the Education Stabilization Fund totaled $34,828. There was not a prevailing wage clause in the contract and certified payrolls were not received. Cause: The District was not aware that wage rate requirements applied to the construction project until after it was completed. Effect: A reimbursement request was made for expenditures that did not comply with wage rate requirements. Questioned Costs: $34,828. Recommendation: Establish controls to comply with wage rate requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund. Consider determining if the contractor performing the project in 2022-2023 paid prevailing wage rates for costs reimbursed by the grant. Otherwise, the District should replace the cost with other allowable costs. Response: The District replaced the cost with other allowable costs.

Corrective Action Plan

2023-002 -#84.425D COVID-19 Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund II Federal Grantor: U.S. Department of Education Pass-through Award Number: 2022-131309-DPI-ESSERFll-163 Pass-through Entity: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Criteria: Wage rate requirements apply to the Education Stabilization Fund when laborers and mechanics employed by contractors or subcontractors work on construction contracts more than $2,000. Laborer must be paid wages not less than those established for the locality of the project (prevailing wage rates) by the Department of Labor (DOL). Nonfederal entities shall include in their contracts subject to wage rate requirements a provision that the contractor or subcontractor complies with those requirements and the DOL regulations. This includes a requirement for the contractor or subcontractor to submit to the District weekly payrolls and a statement of compliance (certified payrolls). Condition: There was one Education Stabilization Fund construction project performed by a subcontractor. Grant expenditures for the project paid by the Education Stabilization Fund totaled $34,828. There was not a prevailing wage clause in the contract and certified payrolls were not received. Cause: The District was not aware that wage rate requirements applied to the construction project until after it was completed. Effect: A reimbursement request was made for expenditures that did not comply with wage rate requirements. Questioned Costs: $34,828. Recommendation: Establish controls to comply with wage rate requirements related to the Education Stabilization Fund. Consider determining if the contractor performing the project in 2022-2023 paid prevailing wage rates for costs reimbursed by the grant. Otherwise, the District should replace the cost with other allowable costs. Response: The District replaced the cost with other allowable costs. Contact Person: Doreen Treuden Anticipated Completion: November 27, 2023

About Special Tests and Provisions →

FY 2022-06-30

$891,078 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on January 25, 2023 — management decision was due July 25, 2023.

2022-001
Other
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYREPEAT OF 2021-001

The responsibility for the District?s bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide adequate segregation of duties and reduce overlapping accounting functions, especially in cash receipts and disbursements. In addition, those functions should be segregated from those overseeing overall finances. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be too costly and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District?s finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day to day financial transactions.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Lack of Segregation of Duties Condition: The responsibility for the District?s bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide adequate segregation of duties and reduce overlapping accounting functions, especially in cash receipts and disbursements. In addition, those functions should be segregated from those overseeing overall finances. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be too costly and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District?s finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day to day financial transactions.

Corrective Action Plan

Lack of Segregation of Duties Condition: The responsibility for the District?s bookkeeping and accounting functions is assumed by a limited number of individuals. The Business Manager enters and approves journal entries and reconciles all bank accounts. Criteria: Internal controls should be in place that provide adequate segregation of duties and reduce overlapping accounting functions, especially in cash receipts and disbursements. In addition, those functions should be segregated from those overseeing overall finances. Cause: The District has determined that hiring additional staff to perform separate accounting duties would be too costly and not an effective use of resources. Effect: Because of the lack of segregation of duties, errors or irregularities could occur and not be detected on a timely basis. Recommendation: The District should be aware of the need for separation of duties and provide for as much separation of duties as feasible in the circumstances. Response: Management of the District is aware that the current number of accounting staff does not allow for full segregation of duties. Segregation of duties is enhanced whenever possible and the Board of Education and management assumes an active roll through monthly review of receipts and disbursements and monthly financial reports. The Superintendent and Business Manager are in constant communication regarding the District?s finances. The Superintendent is not involved in processing day to day financial transactions. Contact Person: Doreen Treuden Anticipated Completion: Not Applicable

Prior Finding References

2021-001

About Other →

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.