EIN: 396018182
UEI: SKEEV5SNNUT3
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen LLP
Oversight agency: 84 [Department of Education]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on March 11, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by September 11, 2026 (5 days from today).
What is a management decision? →During Auditor test work over procurement, we noted the District did not follow its established procedures for procurement sample items. These sample items were over the micro-purchase threshold and required procedures for the small purchase method. The District did not appropriately maintain documentation when entering into these procurements. It did not follow district policy for reviewing vendors for suspension and debarment. Context: The error was noted in 3 out of 5 small purchases and 3 out of 3 suspension and debarment transactions tested that the District did not obtain the proper approvals. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The condition is due to errors in policy implementation. Repeat Finding: No. Effect: Failure to appropriately complete procurement and suspension and debarment procedures can result in the use of nonqualified vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District follows their established procurement policies and adds a suspension/debarment policy. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Type of Finding: Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement: Uniform Guidance requires non-Federal entities receiving Federal awards to establish and maintain internal controls designed to reasonably ensure compliance with Federal laws, regulations, and program compliance requirements. Effective internal controls should include maintaining adequate documentation to demonstrate the execution of procurement and suspension and debarment procedures. Condition: During Auditor test work over procurement, we noted the District did not follow its established procedures for procurement sample items. These sample items were over the micro-purchase threshold and required procedures for the small purchase method. The District did not appropriately maintain documentation when entering into these procurements. It did not follow district policy for reviewing vendors for suspension and debarment. Context: The error was noted in 3 out of 5 small purchases and 3 out of 3 suspension and debarment transactions tested that the District did not obtain the proper approvals. Questioned Costs: None Cause: The condition is due to errors in policy implementation. Repeat Finding: No. Effect: Failure to appropriately complete procurement and suspension and debarment procedures can result in the use of nonqualified vendors. Recommendation: We recommend the District follows their established procurement policies and adds a suspension/debarment policy. Views of Responsible Officials: The District agrees with this finding.
Procurement and Suspension & Debarment for IDEA Cluster Recommendation: The District should follow their established procurement policies and implement a policy to review vendors for suspension and debarment Explanation of disagreement with audit finding: There is no disagreement with the audit finding. Action planned in response to finding: The District will review and modify their policies and procedures that are followed when entering into procurement transactions and ensure that it maintains adequate documentation. Name of the contact person responsible for corrective action: Michelle M. Clark, Business Manager. Planned completion date for corrective action plan: June 30, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on January 2, 2025 — management decision was due July 2, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on March 29, 2024 — management decision was due September 29, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on January 15, 2023 — management decision was due July 15, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on April 26, 2022 — management decision was due October 26, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2021 — management decision was due September 17, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on January 20, 2020 — management decision was due July 20, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on March 17, 2019 — management decision was due September 17, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on December 10, 2017 — management decision was due June 10, 2018.
FAC accepted this audit on January 17, 2017 — management decision was due July 17, 2017.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Add it to a monitored group and get alerted when a new audit, finding, repeat finding, or management-decision deadline shows up — instead of checking back.
Checking several at once? Portfolio view →
© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
