Price CountyLocal Government

EIN: 396005733

UEI: Z2BLLP397G73

Audited by: Baker Tilly US, LLP

Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]

View federal awards & risk assessment →

Data as of August 28, 2026

Price County9 audit years2 findings
9
Audit Years
2
Total Findings
0
Repeat Findings
$2.2M
Federal Awards Expended (FY 2024)

FY 2024-12-31

$2,197,984 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization

The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (152 days ago).

What is a management decision? →

FY 2023-12-31

$2,659,146 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.

FY 2022-12-31

$2,855,691 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 12, 2023 — management decision was due March 12, 2024.

2022-004
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYOTHER MATTERS

The annual report overstated expenditures to date and review of the report specifically was not documented nor did it discover this error. Cause: The March 2022 annual report was the first report that covered a period of time involving actual expenditures rather than obligations only. There was a misunderstanding of how to complete the report. Effect: Users of the annual report may incorrectly believe that total expenditures for two of the projects had more expenditures as of the reporting date than what the county actually incurred. Questioned Costs: None. Context: There was only one report required during the current year and two of the seven projects reported included erroneously overstated expenditures. The County reported planned expenditures rather than only reporting actual incurred expenditures. The sample was not statistically valid. Recommendation: We recommend that the County review the reporting requirements and implement proper review of the annual reporting process. Someone other than the preparer of the report should provide adequate review prior to finalizing the report. This review should include verification that reported expenditure totals agree to the underlying general ledger detail as of the report date. These procedures should be documented and retained. Views of responsible officials: The responsible officials acknowledge this finding is accurate. The County Accountant will provide documentation of the amounts to report that matches the general ledger detail for Nick Trimner, County Administrator, to review and date prior to recording the annual report.

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

Program: COVID-19 Coronavirus State & Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Number: 21.027 Grantor Agency: Wisconsin Department of Treasury Criteria: Based on 42 USC 802 and 803 as implemented by the Treasury's Interim Final Rule and Final Rule at 31 CFR Part 35, recipients of the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds are required to submit special reporting on an annual basis. This reporting is to include current period obligations, cumulative obligations, current period expenditures and cumulative expenditures for each project. Appropriate review of the reporting should be sufficient to correct errors prior to finalizing the report. Condition: The annual report overstated expenditures to date and review of the report specifically was not documented nor did it discover this error. Cause: The March 2022 annual report was the first report that covered a period of time involving actual expenditures rather than obligations only. There was a misunderstanding of how to complete the report. Effect: Users of the annual report may incorrectly believe that total expenditures for two of the projects had more expenditures as of the reporting date than what the county actually incurred. Questioned Costs: None. Context: There was only one report required during the current year and two of the seven projects reported included erroneously overstated expenditures. The County reported planned expenditures rather than only reporting actual incurred expenditures. The sample was not statistically valid. Recommendation: We recommend that the County review the reporting requirements and implement proper review of the annual reporting process. Someone other than the preparer of the report should provide adequate review prior to finalizing the report. This review should include verification that reported expenditure totals agree to the underlying general ledger detail as of the report date. These procedures should be documented and retained. Views of responsible officials: The responsible officials acknowledge this finding is accurate. The County Accountant will provide documentation of the amounts to report that matches the general ledger detail for Nick Trimner, County Administrator, to review and date prior to recording the annual report.

Corrective Action Plan

Corrective Action Planned: Carrie Kyle, County Accountant, will provide documentation of numbers to report that matches the general ledger detail for Nick Trimner, County Administrator to review and date prior to recording the annual report. The next annual report is due March 2024 of which time the County Administrator will review prior to recording the annual report.

About Reporting →

FY 2021-12-31

$2,215,287 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2022 — management decision was due March 27, 2023.

FY 2020-12-31

$2,521,896 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2021 — management decision was due March 22, 2022.

FY 2019-12-31

$1,785,361 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 16, 2020 — management decision was due March 16, 2021.

FY 2018-12-31

$1,709,841 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 22, 2019 — management decision was due March 22, 2020.

FY 2017-12-31

$1,489,437 federal awards expended

FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2018 — management decision was due March 25, 2019.

2017-005
Reporting
SIGNIFICANT DEFICIENCYQUESTIONED COSTSOTHER MATTERS

GSA_MIGRATION

Show full finding ▾
Full finding narrative

GSA_MIGRATION

Corrective Action Plan

GSA_MIGRATION

About Reporting →

FY 2016-12-31

$1,418,311 federal awards expendedNo findings recorded this year

FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2017 — management decision was due March 26, 2018.

Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.

Are you this organization?

Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.

Start tracking findings →

Do you fund this organization?

Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.

Start monitoring →

Product

Resources

Legal

Single Audit Intelligence is an independent tool powered by Federal Audit Clearinghouse data. Not affiliated with GSA, OMB, or any federal agency.

© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.