EIN: 396005673
UEI: JMYJY9FZNPB5
Audited by: WIPFLI LLP
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 3, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by March 30, 2026 (157 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on April 17, 2025 — management decision was due October 17, 2025.
The fiscal year audit and reporting package is being submitted after the required due date. Context: We reviewed the audit submission date in comparison to the required due date. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: There is a potential for suspension or cessation of federal and/or state funding. Cause: There was a delay in receiving necessary information to complete the audit. Repeat: No. Auditor's Recommendation: The County should take steps to ensure that its financial records are maintained on a current basis, reconciled timely, and audited within nine months after year-end. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding presented above.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Late Submission Program Information: Funding agency: United States Department of Health and Human Services Program Titles: 21.027 - Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds/93.658 - Foster Care Title IV-E/93.667 Social Services Block Grant Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR section 200.512(a) and by reference to 2 CFR section 200.512(a), the State Single Audit Guidelines require the reporting package and data collection form to be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse the earlier of 30 calendar days after the reports are received from auditors or nine months after the end of the audit period. Condition: The fiscal year audit and reporting package is being submitted after the required due date. Context: We reviewed the audit submission date in comparison to the required due date. Questioned Costs: None. Effect: There is a potential for suspension or cessation of federal and/or state funding. Cause: There was a delay in receiving necessary information to complete the audit. Repeat: No. Auditor's Recommendation: The County should take steps to ensure that its financial records are maintained on a current basis, reconciled timely, and audited within nine months after year-end. View of Responsible Officials: We agree with the finding presented above.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP): Planned Corrective Action: The County is developing policies and procedures to ensure that financial records are maintained on a more current basis, reconciled timely and audited within nine months after year-end. Anticipated Completion Date: Immediately Responsible Official: Lee Engfer, Administrative Coordinator
FAC accepted this audit on January 10, 2024 — management decision was due July 10, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2022 — management decision was due March 29, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on March 30, 2022 — management decision was due September 30, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2020 — management decision was due March 29, 2021.
2019-004: Procurement and Suspension and Disbarment (Highway Planning and Construction Cluster 20.215 AND 20.219) Criteria ? Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to use their own documented policies and procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal laws and standards. Condition ? As a part of the compliance testing related to the above program, we tested the County?s compliance with the procurement and suspension and disbarment requirements. During this testing, we determined that the County?s current purchasing policy doesn?t contain all required elements per the Uniform Guidance. Context ? The finding appears to be a systematic problem. Questioned Costs ? None. Cause ? The County had not updated its procurement policies and procedures. Effect ? The County could procure goods or services with federal funds that are not in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance or from a vendor who may be suspended or debarred. Recommendation ? The County should periodically evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure they are in accordance with current regulations. Management?s Response ? This finding has been corrected. We started revising our purchasing policy in early 2019. It was adopted by the Finance Committee in December and approved by the County Board of Supervisors in December of 2019.This was work in progress when the testing had been completed by the auditors. During the year, proper purchasing procedures were used in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2019-004: Procurement and Suspension and Disbarment (Highway Planning and Construction Cluster 20.215 AND 20.219) Criteria ? Uniform Guidance requires non-federal entities to use their own documented policies and procedures which reflect applicable state, local, and tribal laws and regulations, provided that the procurements conform to applicable federal laws and standards. Condition ? As a part of the compliance testing related to the above program, we tested the County?s compliance with the procurement and suspension and disbarment requirements. During this testing, we determined that the County?s current purchasing policy doesn?t contain all required elements per the Uniform Guidance. Context ? The finding appears to be a systematic problem. Questioned Costs ? None. Cause ? The County had not updated its procurement policies and procedures. Effect ? The County could procure goods or services with federal funds that are not in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Guidance or from a vendor who may be suspended or debarred. Recommendation ? The County should periodically evaluate its policies and procedures to ensure they are in accordance with current regulations. Management?s Response ? This finding has been corrected. We started revising our purchasing policy in early 2019. It was adopted by the Finance Committee in December and approved by the County Board of Supervisors in December of 2019.This was work in progress when the testing had been completed by the auditors. During the year, proper purchasing procedures were used in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
This finding has been corrected. We started revising our purchasing policy in early 2019. It was adopted by the Finance Committee in December and approved by the County Board of Supervisors in December of 2019.This was work in progress when the testing had been completed by the auditors. During the year, proper purchasing procedures were used in compliance with Uniform Guidance.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2019 — management decision was due March 29, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2018 — management decision was due March 30, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2017 — management decision was due March 29, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.
