EIN: 396005671
UEI: DDNMD7YRLX58
Audited by: CliftonLarsonAllen, LLP
Oversight agency: 93 [Department of Health and Human Services]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 28, 2025. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 28, 2026 (187 days ago).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on September 4, 2024 — management decision was due March 4, 2025.
2023-002 Suspension & Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Names: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Health Services Pass-Through Numbers: 155811 and 2021-VO-A/VO-01-17452 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRF1158; 2020 Award Periods: March 1, 2020 – December 31, 2024 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200 states that nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition While the County has policies and procedures relating to suspension and debarment, they do not meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs None. Context While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that suspension and debarment procedures were not completed for all vendors meeting the requirements. Subsequent client procedures concluded that none of the contractors or vendors were suspended or debarred. Cause The County’s current procurement policy does not follow Uniform Guidance. Effect The County is not in compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Vendors may be paid with federal funds that are suspended and debarred entities which would not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding Yes Recommendation We recommend the County review and update procurement policies for the entire County to include suspension and debarment to ensure it meets the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials The County has implemented a new purchasing policy effective January 2024 that is in compliance with UGG.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴2023-002 Suspension & Debarment Federal Agency: U.S. Department of Treasury Federal Program Names: COVID-19 Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds Assistance Listing Numbers: 21.027 Pass-Through Agency: Wisconsin Department of Health Services Pass-Through Numbers: 155811 and 2021-VO-A/VO-01-17452 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: SLFRF1158; 2020 Award Periods: March 1, 2020 – December 31, 2024 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance, Other Matters Criteria or Specific Requirement 2 CFR 200 states that nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. “Covered transactions” include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition While the County has policies and procedures relating to suspension and debarment, they do not meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs None. Context While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that suspension and debarment procedures were not completed for all vendors meeting the requirements. Subsequent client procedures concluded that none of the contractors or vendors were suspended or debarred. Cause The County’s current procurement policy does not follow Uniform Guidance. Effect The County is not in compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Vendors may be paid with federal funds that are suspended and debarred entities which would not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding Yes Recommendation We recommend the County review and update procurement policies for the entire County to include suspension and debarment to ensure it meets the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials The County has implemented a new purchasing policy effective January 2024 that is in compliance with UGG.
The County has implemented a new purchasing policy effective January 2024 that is in compliance with UGG.
2022-002
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2023 — management decision was due March 28, 2024.
While the County has policies and procedures relating to suspension and debarment, they do not meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that suspension and debarment procedures were not completed for all vendors meeting the requirements. Subsequent client procedures concluded that none of the contractors or vendors were suspended or debarred. Cause: The County?s current procurement policy does not follow Uniform Guidance. Effect: The County is not in compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Vendors may be paid with federal funds that are suspended and debarred entities which would not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County review and update procurement policies for the entire County to include suspension and debarment to ensure it meets the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴Criteria or Specific Requirement: 2 CFR 200 states that nonfederal entities are prohibited from contracting with or making subawards under covered transactions to parties that are suspended or debarred. ?Covered transactions? include contracts for goods and services awarded under a nonprocurement transaction (e.g., grant or cooperative agreement) that are expected to equal or exceed $25,000 or meet certain other criteria as specified in 2 CFR section 180.220). All nonprocurement transactions entered into by a pass-through entity (i.e., subawards to subrecipients), irrespective of award amount, are considered covered transactions, unless they are exempt as provided in 2 CFR section 180.215. When a non-Federal entity enters into a covered transaction with an entity at a lower tier, the non-Federal entity must verify that the entity, as defined in 2 CFR section 180.995 and agency adopting regulations, is not suspended or debarred or otherwise excluded from participating in the transaction. Condition: While the County has policies and procedures relating to suspension and debarment, they do not meet Uniform Guidance requirements. Questioned Costs: None. Context: While performing compliance procedures, it was noted that suspension and debarment procedures were not completed for all vendors meeting the requirements. Subsequent client procedures concluded that none of the contractors or vendors were suspended or debarred. Cause: The County?s current procurement policy does not follow Uniform Guidance. Effect: The County is not in compliance with suspension and debarment requirements. Vendors may be paid with federal funds that are suspended and debarred entities which would not be in compliance with the Uniform Guidance. Repeat Finding: No Recommendation: We recommend the County review and update procurement policies for the entire County to include suspension and debarment to ensure it meets the minimum requirements of 2 CFR 200 for all federal grants. View of Responsible Officials: There is no disagreement with the finding.
The County will develop a suspension and debarment procedure that includes the verification of vendors and retaining support for it.
FAC accepted this audit on September 26, 2022 — management decision was due March 26, 2023.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Provider Relief Funds Assistance Listing Number ? 93.498 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: PRF20200001 and Year 2020 Award Period: 4/10/20 ? 12/31/21 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. The County should have control activities for ensuring accurate reporting. Condition It was noted that there was a lack of independent review of the Provider Relief Fund reports submitted to the U.S. Treasury by someone that did not prepare the report. Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place to ensure there is an independent review of reports. Questioned Costs: None. Cause The County does not have a system of internal controls in place to ensure reports are reviewed by an independent person who did not prepare the report. Repeat Finding: N/A Effect Grant expenditures could be over or under-reported and not detected by County personnel. Recommendation We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure that someone knowledgeable of the grant requirements reviews the report prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials The County agrees with this finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Provider Relief Funds Assistance Listing Number ? 93.498 Federal Award Identification Number and Year: PRF20200001 and Year 2020 Award Period: 4/10/20 ? 12/31/21 Type of Finding Significant Deficiency in Internal Control Over Compliance Criteria or Specific Requirement Uniform Guidance requires the reporting of costs or activities as the basis for making payments to providers. The County should have control activities for ensuring accurate reporting. Condition It was noted that there was a lack of independent review of the Provider Relief Fund reports submitted to the U.S. Treasury by someone that did not prepare the report. Context While performing audit procedures, it was noted that the County does not have policies in place to ensure there is an independent review of reports. Questioned Costs: None. Cause The County does not have a system of internal controls in place to ensure reports are reviewed by an independent person who did not prepare the report. Repeat Finding: N/A Effect Grant expenditures could be over or under-reported and not detected by County personnel. Recommendation We recommend the County implement procedures to ensure that someone knowledgeable of the grant requirements reviews the report prior to submission. Views of Responsible Officials The County agrees with this finding.
Provider Relief All required reporting was completed for CARES Act Provider Relief Fund (PRF) funding based on financial and other records of the Brown County Health and Human Services Department. The County recognizes that without a procedure for review of reporting by someone other than the preparer there is an increased chance for errors and omissions. Review by a second knowledgeable person for accuracy and completeness has been completed retroactively for previous CARES Act PRF reporting and will be completed in the future for financial and other compliance reporting by Brown County HHS finance staff.
FAC accepted this audit on October 18, 2021 — management decision was due April 18, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on December 30, 2020 — management decision was due June 30, 2021.
FAC accepted this audit on September 29, 2019 — management decision was due March 29, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on September 28, 2017 — management decision was due March 28, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.