EIN: 396005563
UEI: EHDHM7REMJE1
Audited by: KerberRose
Oversight agency: 21 [Department of the Treasury]
View federal awards & risk assessment →
Data as of September 2, 2026
Management decision deadline — for entities that funded this organization
The FAC accepted this audit on August 13, 2026. Under 2 CFR 200.521(d), a pass-through entity that provided federal funds to this organization for this audit period must issue a management decision on these findings by February 13, 2027 (162 days from today).
What is a management decision? →FAC accepted this audit on August 27, 2025 — management decision was due February 27, 2026.
FAC accepted this audit on September 30, 2024 — management decision was due March 30, 2025.
FAC accepted this audit on September 18, 2023 — management decision was due March 18, 2024.
FAC accepted this audit on September 13, 2022 — management decision was due March 13, 2023.
FAC accepted this audit on October 3, 2021 — management decision was due April 3, 2022.
FAC accepted this audit on September 23, 2020 — management decision was due March 23, 2021.
The Community Development Department of the City of Oshkosh is responsible for the operation of the Community Development Block Grant. Our audit noted that the City?s Community Development Department utilizes time studies to allocate payroll costs between grant and non-grant activities. Documentation was not maintained for one individual within the department to support the allocation of payroll costs. Questioned Costs: NEED Cause: The individual in question is no longer employed by the City and as such the City was not able to locate the necessary documentation. Effect: The City did not have the required supporting documentation to support the allocation of payroll costs to the grant program. The City did not allocate all of the employee?s wages, and the position was directly associated with the grant program and therefore no questioned costs were identified. Recommendation: We recommend the Department establish a policy and implement procedures to ensure compliance with the standards associated with the documentation of payroll costs under Uniform Guidance View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
Show full finding ▾Hide full finding ▴UNIFORM GUIDANCE AND STATE SINGLE AUDIT GUIDELINES FINDINGS: Time & Effort Documentation Federal Agency: US Department of Housing and Urban Development; Federal program title: Community Development Block Grant Entitlement Program; CFDA Number: 14.218; Award Period: 5/1/2019 ? 4/30/2020; Type of Finding: Significant Deficiency in Internal Control over Compliance; Compliance Requirement: Allowable Costs Criteria: Total salaries charged to Federal awards (including extra service pay) are subject to the Standards of Documentation as described by 2 CFR ?200.430(i). Per this section, salaries and wages charged to Federal awards must be based on records that accurately reflect the work performed. These records must: ? Be incorporated into the organization?s official records; ? Reasonably reflect the total activity for which the employee is compensating across all grant-related and non-grant related activities (100% effort); ? Support the distribution of employee salary across multiple activities or cost objectives (for example, effort spent on multiple federal awards, spent on general/or administrative activities, vacation, sick leave, leave without pay, etc.); and ? Utilize an "after-the-fact" review of the employee?s actual hours worked during the reporting period for identifying and correcting significant changes (as defined by the organization?s written policies). Condition: The Community Development Department of the City of Oshkosh is responsible for the operation of the Community Development Block Grant. Our audit noted that the City?s Community Development Department utilizes time studies to allocate payroll costs between grant and non-grant activities. Documentation was not maintained for one individual within the department to support the allocation of payroll costs. Questioned Costs: NEED Cause: The individual in question is no longer employed by the City and as such the City was not able to locate the necessary documentation. Effect: The City did not have the required supporting documentation to support the allocation of payroll costs to the grant program. The City did not allocate all of the employee?s wages, and the position was directly associated with the grant program and therefore no questioned costs were identified. Recommendation: We recommend the Department establish a policy and implement procedures to ensure compliance with the standards associated with the documentation of payroll costs under Uniform Guidance View of Responsible Officials There is no disagreement with the audit finding.
The City continues to monitor and evaluate the performance of the City's CDBG programs and activities while ensuring regulatory compliance. The City's Annual Action Plan and Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPERS) have provided details about the innovations, projects and programs completed by the City over the past (documents may be viewed or downloaded from the City's website). The City recognizes that the evaluation of past performance is critical to ensuring the City and its subrecipients are implementing activities effectively and that those activities align with the City's overall strategies and goals. The performance of programs and systems are evaluated on a regular basis. The City continues to improve the CDBG subrecipient application process in order to ease the administrative burden on applicants and volunteer community-member boards and reviewers.
FAC accepted this audit on September 25, 2019 — management decision was due March 25, 2020.
FAC accepted this audit on September 27, 2018 — management decision was due March 27, 2019.
FAC accepted this audit on September 4, 2017 — management decision was due March 4, 2018.
Data source: This information comes from the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, the official repository of Single Audit data. All data is public domain. Verify this organization's audit history at fac.gov.
Browse other Single Audit organizations in Wisconsin →
Track your findings and corrective action plans across audit cycles.
Start tracking findings →Monitor subrecipient audit findings and filing records.
Start monitoring →© 2026 Single Audit Intelligence. All data is public domain.